0
   

GUN PROHIBITION: OVERTHROWN!

 
 
Reply Mon 29 Mar, 2010 07:26 pm
March 28, 2010
Boro’s gun ban shot down
Susan Evans The Tribune-Democrat
EBENSBURG " An Ebensburg man challenged the borough’s ban
on carrying guns in town parks " and won.

On the advice of the borough solicitor, who reviewed Timothy L. Havener’s complaint
and agreed with it, Borough Council members on March 22 deleted the language
prohibiting firearms in parks.

That means gun-toters, if permitted for other locations, also will
be allowed at locations such as Ebensburg’s tennis courts,
swimming pool, Lake Rowena and the town’s small parks.

“We didn’t know,” said borough Manager Dan Penatzer.
“We thought the borough had the right to regulate firearms in a
government building or facility, but it’s only in a building with
some kind of court facility, like even a holding cell.

“Apparently that means someone could show up at a council
meeting carrying a gun, and there’s nothing we could do about it
if it’s otherwise legal.”

Havener has an unlisted telephone number and could not be reached
for comment, but he explained his challenge in a Feb. 17 letter to borough officials.

“No county, municipality or township may in any manner regulate
the lawful ownership, possession, transfer, or transportation of firearms,
ammunition or ammunition components when carried or transported
for purposes not prohibited by the laws of this Commonwealth,”
he quoted the Pennsylvania Uniform Firearms Act as saying.

Havener argued that the borough’s laws were in violation because
they prohibited carrying firearms in parks or recreation areas.

“I feel obligated to disclose this information to my local government officials
and ask that they rewrite the ordinance in question so that they comply
with the state mandate concerning the right of citizens to carry firearms,”
he said in his letter to the borough.

Specifically on March 22 council members deleted the language
prohibiting firearms and agreed to advertise the changed ordinance
for public inspection.

Ebensburg is not the only local government facing challenges
to bans on guns in parks.

Last month a Seattle rule banning firearms from city parks was
struck down in a King County Court action applauded by the
National Rifle Association, which was a party to the lawsuit.

An ordinance in Elwood City banning guns in government buildings
was struck down last year after a challenge by the National Rifle Association.



  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 795 • Replies: 6
No top replies

 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Mon 29 Mar, 2010 07:29 pm


HOORAY !!!!!





David
0 Replies
 
boomerang
 
  1  
Reply Mon 29 Mar, 2010 08:42 pm
And here I keep hearing that under the Obama administration that "they" are going to take everyone's guns away and make even thinking about a gun against the law.

So what's up with all the new lax gun carrying stuff? Everything I see seems to say that carrying a gun around is more a-okay than ever.
roger
 
  2  
Reply Mon 29 Mar, 2010 08:49 pm
@boomerang,
State level and below don't seem terribly responsive to the President, do they?
boomerang
 
  1  
Reply Mon 29 Mar, 2010 09:03 pm
@roger,
You're right!

But this stuff rolls uphill eventually.
OmSigDAVID
 
  0  
Reply Mon 29 Mar, 2010 09:46 pm
@boomerang,
boomerang wrote:
And here I keep hearing that under the Obama administration that "they" are going
to take everyone's guns away and make even thinking about a gun against the law.

So what's up with all the new lax gun carrying stuff?
Everything I see seems to say that carrying a gun around is more a-okay than ever.
Obama hates gun ownership, and he blurted out an attack
against the 2nd Amendment when HELLER was decided by USSC in June 2008.
(As I remember he said [approximately] "well then, we 'll see if we can
do something about the 2nd Amendment" implying revocation.)

So far, he has been distracted by other considerations,
and he knows from observation of recent history (1994) that,
the same as Social Security, the 2nd Amendment is a 3rd rail
of politics
; gotta be careful. All of his appointed federal judges,
predictably, are anti-gun, but as Roger has pointed out,
developments like this overthrow of a gun ban do not fall
within Obama 's jurisdiction. This was beyond his reach.





David
0 Replies
 
roger
 
  1  
Reply Mon 29 Mar, 2010 09:50 pm
@boomerang,
boomerang wrote:

You're right!

But this stuff rolls uphill eventually.


Usually, "stuff" rolls downhill. I am not sorry to see the change.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Drumsticks - Discussion by H2O MAN
nobody respects an oath breaker - Discussion by gungasnake
Marksmanship - Discussion by H2O MAN
Kids and Guns by the Numbers - Discussion by jcboy
Personal Defense Weapons (PDW) - Discussion by H2O MAN
Self defense with a gun - Discussion by H2O MAN
It's a sellers market - Discussion by H2O MAN
Harrisburg Pa. Outdoor Show "Postponed" - Discussion by gungasnake
 
  1. Forums
  2. » GUN PROHIBITION: OVERTHROWN!
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 12/25/2024 at 11:27:53