Lightwizard wrote:An imperfection in a Picasso would be rather difficult to find! I would say it would matter in a painting by Ingres or one of the Dutch masters. I believe they did strive for a kind of perfection but with painting it would be an opinion on whether they reached it or not. There are too many things to consider other than technique -- color, composition, perspective, etc. God, if one wants to relent that it exists, has left all sorts of imperfections even if one doesn't scrutinize nature closely. So a statement of that sort is subjective and ultimately meaningless.
I didn't mean to be obscure, LW. I'm reading this thread from the beginning. The above was your first post... and the last statement was the one I referred to; you said "... a statement of that sort is subjective and ultimately meaningless."
"Meaningless," I said, "perhaps, but not to the person, the artist, who first said it."
An artist friend on finishing up for the day, has more than once said to me, "Better is the enemy of Good." I take that to mean he sees some small imperfections but appreciates his work enough not to change it.