2
   

MORE GUN FREEDOM FOR THE JOY OF ARIZONA?

 
 
parados
 
  2  
Reply Fri 5 Feb, 2010 04:24 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
Completely ridiculous David.

Would you argue -

EITHER
you have the right to shoot anyone you want

OR

You don't have any gun rights at all

BUT

Logically, you can't have it both ways.

OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Fri 5 Feb, 2010 04:54 pm
@parados,
parados wrote:

Completely ridiculous David.

Would you argue -

EITHER
you have the right to shoot anyone you want

OR

You don't have any gun rights at all

BUT

Logically, you can't have it both ways.


U ridicule logic itself.
I have trouble taking u seriously.
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Fri 5 Feb, 2010 04:56 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
Quote:
U ridicule logic itself.
I have trouble taking u seriously.
Interesting statement David
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Fri 5 Feb, 2010 05:01 pm
@farmerman,
farmerman wrote:
Youre wrong David. A business owner has the right to ban smoking, drinking, weapons, or any other societal trappings he consideres not to be in concert with a type of establishment that he (or she ) wishes to run.

I 'll stand by the points that I made,
the dichotomy, in my last post.
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  1  
Reply Fri 5 Feb, 2010 05:08 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
It's your logic David. Glad you see how ridiculous it is.

You think you can have gun rights if you are restricted in what you can do with your gun but you argue you have no property rights if your aren't completely free to do everything you want.
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Fri 5 Feb, 2010 05:11 pm
@parados,
parados wrote:
It's your logic David. Glad you see how ridiculous it is.

You think you can have gun rights if you are restricted in what you can do with your gun but you argue you have no property rights if your aren't completely free to do everything you want.
It appears that cognition of the contending arguments
is beyond your powers of analysis.
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Fri 5 Feb, 2010 05:26 pm
I suppose it's a matter of perspective. I've lived in the southwest most all of my adult life and, other the the city of Denver, it's always been quite legal to carry not-concealed firearms. I've done so myself. On the other hand the very idea of carry concealed seems to me (yes I've done that too) unwarranted.
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  1  
Reply Fri 5 Feb, 2010 05:28 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
OmSigDAVID wrote:



In MY vu, it is an all or nothing situation.

EITHER
an owner of commercial realty is autonomous
in keeping everyone out of his property except such as he CHOOSES
to admit, by his subjective criteria alone,(the same as his private home)

OR

along with all races, religions, ages, perverts,
any citizen who wishes to exercise his constitutional right
to defend his life from violent depredations shoud be admitted
with his guns, for his safety, as a matter of life and death,

BUT,

logically: u can' t have it both ways.





David


So, if I can't use my gun how I want to, isn't it an "all or nothing" situation? Either I am autonomous to do whatever I want or I'm not.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Drumsticks - Discussion by H2O MAN
nobody respects an oath breaker - Discussion by gungasnake
Marksmanship - Discussion by H2O MAN
Kids and Guns by the Numbers - Discussion by jcboy
CO gun-grabbers go down in flames in recall - Discussion by gungasnake
Personal Defense Weapons (PDW) - Discussion by H2O MAN
Self defense with a gun - Discussion by H2O MAN
It's a sellers market - Discussion by H2O MAN
 
Copyright © 2019 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 10/14/2019 at 09:27:59