@Finn dAbuzz,
Well, the US is pretty good at mass shootings.
So are a number of other countries, but you guys are up there.
Sounds as though US citizenship is one of the many things that need to be considered in profiling likely mass shooters.
Here's just a few.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2007/apr/17/usa.internationaleducationnews
It likely is very relevant that THIS shooter is Muslim, since he was being ordered to a war many Muslims see as anti-Muslim, AND he was apparently quite affected by anti-Muslim prejudice in the military.
It seems unlikely that he began as a Muslim militant, but he seems to have ended up there, IF current reporting is to be believed.
I hope that his journey, if that is what it was, is learned from.
A stand? Massacres suck. By anyone, anywhere.
Do you intend to religiously profile all previous massacres by US citizens?
Here's some more mass shootings.
http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0777958.html
And some of civilians in war:
http://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/RM1.MYLAI.HTM
War tends not to be good for civilians. Lots of countries seem to kill a lot of us.
This seems a little hysterical, but you may wish to consider it, even though they are not all Muslims:
http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2009-11-07/americas-mass-murder-addiction/
Here's some general mass murder.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_murder
Not all Muslim again, surprisingly, at least to you.
Now....have we finished using the current dead and mutilated bodies as an ideological kindergarten, and considered grieving for them for the people they were, and striving to learn from their deaths?
Hmmm?