EUGENICS R GOOD: TRUE or FALSE ??

First, correct any genetic flaws that give rise to disease.
Next, do the best possible to increase robustly good health
for as long as it is possible for me to do; a good energy level.
The best possible for high I.Q. and E.S.P.
Good memory; good analytical ability, quickly. Speed reader.
Blue eyes; blond hair, an agreeable, harmonious face.
A talent for discerning significant patterns.
A well co-ordinated, proficient marksman;
an articulate lover of liberty and individualism.

First, correct any genetic flaws that give rise to disease.
Next, do the best possible to increase robustly good health
for as long as it is possible for me to do; a good energy level.
The best possible for high I.Q. and E.S.P.
Good memory; good analytical ability, quickly. Speed reader.
Blue eyes; blond hair, an agreeable, harmonious face.
A talent for discerning significant patterns.
A well co-ordinated, proficient marksman;
an articulate lover of liberty and individualism.

rosborne979 wrote:

I believe that humanity will go through a period of selective breeding and genetic manipulation, but that it will be superseded by the advent of dynamic genetic manipulation available at any point during our life cycle.

Eventually eugenics will be a self-administered medical choice. We will alter our genetic structures the way we get plastic surgery.

I also expect that we will be inclined to alter our basic physiology through the use of nanotechnology which will in many cases supersede the functionality of cellular systems. Humanity is destined to evolve itself into a hybridized bio-technological race of cyborgs. And from that vantage point we will look back at simple eugenic selection as quaint.

Very well put, Rosbourne.
I approve of human improvement.

To your mind, are these forthcoming changes good or bad ?

But discrimination could only exist if there was a caste system.

Dave has to have all 301 million meeting the standards he sets or admit to a Strangelove fantasy.

It is possible that the human is already as he depicts and it is
the decanting system which causes the characteristics he seeks to eradicate.

His society has to be a one-party state.

That makes no sense.

I saw the movie,
but I have no idea what u mean.

????

Nonsense

Spendi is the master of "obscure tangentialism" .

I only write for the "few" effemm. It's been obvious for a long while that you are not one of them.

Spendi is the master of "obscure tangentialism" .

Hes often not even rational.

In addition, as seen in your post, you have a really deformed perception of who, or what, I hold in high esteem..

I believe he believes that he is just unearthly clever for us mere mortals.

(Despite his constant assertions) HEs not shown me anything in the minimal scholarship re: several of the topics herein and all he involves himself in doing is to merely post crappola that is counter to the immediately previous poster.(Please deny that is you can, cause statistically thats a big outlier, and that is a fact, unless youve missed it.

he will start trying to engage the subject rather than just making up catch phrases and being as misogynistic as he can be.

HEs mostly harmless but he is a vile bitter troll who, for the most part, has little to offer in the way of substance. You sem to hold him in a higher loft than I. semeiologist, hardly. Hes often not even rational.

I have been wondering if Dr Scott is a Reichian. Could you enlighten us on the matter. It would be of considerable importance if she is.

overall, I, like fresco, dont trust humanity to even consider "The right thing" let alone do it.