18
   

Conservatives say the Bible is too Liberal

 
 
ebrown p
 
  1  
Reply Tue 6 Oct, 2009 12:20 am
@OmSigDAVID,
Matthew 5 wrote:
"You have heard that it was said, 'Eye for eye, and tooth for tooth.' But I tell you, Do not resist an evil person. If someone strikes you on the right cheek, turn to him the other also. And if someone wants to sue you and take your tunic, let him have your cloak as well. If someone forces you to go one mile, go with him two miles. Give to the one who asks you, and do not turn away from the one who wants to borrow from you.

"You have heard that it was said, 'Love your neighbor and hate your enemy.' But I tell you: Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, that you may be sons of your Father in heaven. He causes his sun to rise on the evil and the good, and sends rain on the righteous and the unrighteous. If you love those who love you, what reward will you get? Are not even the tax collectors doing that? And if you greet only your brothers, what are you doing more than others? Do not even pagans do that? Be perfect, therefore, as your heavenly Father is perfect.


Do not resist the evil man. Love your enemies pray for those who persecute you.

I don't know how you can twist this into conservative (but I suppose they will try.)
ebrown p
 
  2  
Reply Tue 6 Oct, 2009 12:24 am
Also David, you quote the "get thou a sword verse" out of context. The story ends like this.

Quote:
Then the men stepped forward, seized Jesus and arrested him. With that, one of Jesus' companions reached for his sword, drew it out and struck the servant of the high priest, cutting off his ear.

"Put your sword back in its place," Jesus said to him, "for all who draw the sword will die by the sword.


But besides, I thought you didn't believe the Bible.
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Tue 6 Oct, 2009 12:28 am
@ebrown p,
ebrown p wrote:

Matthew 5 wrote:
"You have heard that it was said, 'Eye for eye, and tooth for tooth.' But I tell you, Do not resist an evil person. If someone strikes you on the right cheek, turn to him the other also. And if someone wants to sue you and take your tunic, let him have your cloak as well. If someone forces you to go one mile, go with him two miles. Give to the one who asks you, and do not turn away from the one who wants to borrow from you.

"You have heard that it was said, 'Love your neighbor and hate your enemy.' But I tell you: Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, that you may be sons of your Father in heaven. He causes his sun to rise on the evil and the good, and sends rain on the righteous and the unrighteous. If you love those who love you, what reward will you get? Are not even the tax collectors doing that? And if you greet only your brothers, what are you doing more than others? Do not even pagans do that? Be perfect, therefore, as your heavenly Father is perfect.


Quote:
Do not resist the evil man.
Love your enemies pray for those who persecute you.

If in doubt,
check the cite Luke 22:36. Maybe Jesus had in mind the degree
of offense that u shoud resist, rather than effectively commit suicide.


Quote:
I don't know how you can twist this into conservative (but I suppose they will try.)
If it is a LITERAL translation
from the original language (Aramaic ?), that makes it conservative
in that there is no deviation.

Nothing can be liberal unless it deviates from something,
because liberal is a relative word, except if it is used to indicate "generous".
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Tue 6 Oct, 2009 04:23 am
@ebrown p,
ebrown p wrote:

Also David, you quote the "get thou a sword verse" out of context. The story ends like this.

Quote:
Then the men stepped forward, seized Jesus and arrested him.
With that, one of Jesus' companions reached for his sword,
drew it out and struck the servant of the high priest, cutting off his ear.

"Put your sword back in its place," Jesus said to him,
"for all who draw the sword will die by the sword.
The story does NOT end like that; it ends with Jesus ascending to Heaven.
Additionally, since there were soldiers there with the multitude,
it seems that those swords were not tactically sufficient to prevail
and woud have resulted in Jesus' followers getting killed with swords
if thay defended, at that time and place,
as distinct from it being a general or universal situation.

Anyway, after he recommended that whoever does not own a sword shoud buy one,
his followers showed him that thay had 2 swords and he approved. Luke 22:38

Soon thereafter Judas led "a multitude" to Jesus,
who was asked whether thay shoud resist with swords Luke 22:49
and thay counter-attacked some of that multitude.

OF COURSE, Jesus called them off because it was not his purpose
to prevent and defeat the crucifiction. The arrest preceded the crucifiction.
According to Christian theory, the crucifiction paved the way for Man
to be forgiven by God. Therefore, Judas and the multitude
were arranging circumstances for that to fall into place,
so counter-attacking with swords was not appropriate at that time.










Quote:
But besides, I thought you didn't believe the Bible.

I respect Jesus





David
dlowan
 
  2  
Reply Tue 6 Oct, 2009 04:55 am
@Diest TKO,
Well, the bible has had bits that people don't like ignored since the damn thing was cobbled together.

And it's always been a damn Rorschach.

Nonetheless....
0 Replies
 
Thomas
 
  1  
Reply Tue 6 Oct, 2009 05:14 am
@Green Witch,
Laughing
0 Replies
 
Thomas
 
  1  
Reply Tue 6 Oct, 2009 05:16 am
@dyslexia,
Didn't Jesus spread the wealth around even? Such a Socialist.
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Tue 6 Oct, 2009 05:35 am
@Thomas,
The Bawble is plenty conservative

"The poor you shall always have with you"

The t acceptance to not worry about anyone else but oneself , can be sourced from that verse.


0 Replies
 
revel
 
  1  
Reply Tue 6 Oct, 2009 06:19 am
@OmSigDAVID,
Nevertheless osdavid, you did originally try to portray "Put up again thy sword into his place" as some kind of endorsement of gun (sword) rights or something like that after responding the image of Jesus holding a sword.

Everybody usually gets what they want out of the Bible, I don't see why yet another translation needs to be made much less one favoring a modern conservative tone.

For instance the bit where farmerman tries to make out like Jesus just didn't care about the poor, it is typical example.

Quote:
Mar 14:7 For ye have the poor with you always, and whensoever ye will ye may do them good: but me ye have not always.


Mar 14:8 She hath done what she could: she is come aforehand to anoint my body to the burying.

Mar 14:9 Verily I say unto you, Wheresoever this gospel shall be preached throughout the whole world, [this] also that she hath done shall be spoken of for a memorial of her.


source

(I just happen the like the lyricness ( not a word) of the king james version and would never even read a "more concise version" or even a more modern one.)
ebrown p
 
  1  
Reply Tue 6 Oct, 2009 06:44 am
@revel,
I don't buy it revel... you are taking the verses out of context. The narrative of the gospels, and the parts of the social commentary of the epistles, taken as a whole are strikingly liberal.

There are plenty of passages about non-violence and forgiveness. There is not a single passage where violence is condoned (except for the arrest of Jesus which as Luke said, ends in Jesus healing the victim of his disciples violent act).

Then there are the socialist parts, for example in Acts 2 where the earliest Christians "had everything in common" and "sold their possessions" so there were no needy among them. Trying to find a place where greed is advocated in the Bible requires cherry picking phrases and a rather large twist of logic.

As a whole, the Bible is not ambiguous at all.

The Bible is unquestionably conservative in women and homosexuality.

But on issues of forgiveness, non-violence and sharing the wealth it is unquestionably liberal.


farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Tue 6 Oct, 2009 06:50 am
@revel,
I was quote mining, a concept that is a toolbox trick of the Evangelical Christians.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Tue 6 Oct, 2009 07:25 am
@ebrown p,
Quote:
As a whole, the Bible is not ambiguous at all.


Ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahaha
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

Stop it Brown, yer killin' me . . .

Hey . . . Brown . . . wanna buy a bridge?
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Tue 6 Oct, 2009 09:55 am
@Green Witch,
Green Witch wrote:

http://www.studio303.com/masonice/jesus_gun.jpeg


Is this something you can buy framed?
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Reply Tue 6 Oct, 2009 11:25 am
@djjd62,
back to temple for everyone!
0 Replies
 
JPB
 
  2  
Reply Tue 6 Oct, 2009 11:38 am
@Diest TKO,
Quote:
2. Not Emasculated: avoiding unisex, "gender inclusive" language, and other modern emasculation of Christianity


Right! Those women need to know who's in charge!
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Tue 6 Oct, 2009 12:08 pm
@Thomas,
Thomas wrote:

Didn't Jesus spread the wealth around even? Such a Socialist.
It can be fun to begift people who don 't expect it.
Generosity can be good,
but property shoud not be extorted from people
to give it to others. "Thou shall not steal."
ebrown p
 
  1  
Reply Tue 6 Oct, 2009 12:13 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
Quote:
It can be fun to begift people who don 't expect it.
Generosity can be good,
but property shoud not be extorted from people
to give it to others. "Thou shall not steal."


... and pay your taxes.
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Tue 6 Oct, 2009 12:32 pm
@revel,
revel wrote:

Quote:

Nevertheless osdavid, you did originally try to portray "Put up again thy sword into his place"
as some kind of endorsement of gun (sword) rights
or something like that after responding the image of Jesus holding a sword.
YES; that remains unrefuted,
but it was from Jesus' recommendation that whoever does not own
a sword (extrapolated to a gun, today) shoud buy one. Luke 22:36

Jesus did support the right to keep and bear arms
and the wisdom of doing so.

For instance, last nite, I saw on the National Geographic Channel
where 2 young girls decided to HIKE in Alaska, and got hiking equipment.
When offered, thay explicitly rejected a gun. [I was SHOCKED!!!]
Within 2 hours, one of the unarmed girls
had been killed by a polar bear and the other
had jumped off a cliff to avoid him.
It is wiser to carry sufficient firepower
than it is to jump off of a cliff.
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Tue 6 Oct, 2009 12:41 pm
@ebrown p,
ebrown p wrote:

Quote:
It can be fun to begift people who don 't expect it.
Generosity can be good,
but property shoud not be extorted from people
to give it to others. "Thou shall not steal."


... and pay your taxes.

Taxes r extortion.
Paying taxes is indistinguishable from giving your watch and cash
to a robber in the street.
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Tue 6 Oct, 2009 12:44 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
OmSigDAVID wrote:

ebrown p wrote:

Quote:
It can be fun to begift people who don 't expect it.
Generosity can be good,
but property shoud not be extorted from people
to give it to others. "Thou shall not steal."


... and pay your taxes.

Taxes r extortion.
Paying taxes is indistinguishable from giving your watch and cash
to a robber in the street.


Horse ****. The robber provides you nothing at all in return, the taxes paid to lay down the concrete on that street, put up the lights, and build the infrastructure for the whole goddamn town you are in.

Terrible comparison.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 05/04/2024 at 10:16:32