@engineer,
Quote:And did anyone really think dogs weren't as smart as 2 year olds?
I didn't. Not to boast, but when my son was two years old he could tell me every single person's name in my family (and we have a BIG family- now it's over thirty members including his aunts, uncles and cousins- when he was two there were over twenty people). And if I'd say, 'What's Granpa's name - where was he born, what's his birthday?' he'd say, 'Eggwin (edwin)
(I taped it so he could hear himself later), San Antonio Texas, October 22, and we'd go through the list (to kill time driving to see the family in NJ from Maine). He had a phenomenal memory at two - and still does.
So no - I didn't and actually still wouldn't equate a dog's intelligence with a two year old child's. Their brains are ready and tooled for different tasks.
A two year old's receptive vocabuly will grow by a few THOUSAND words during their third year (between the ages of 2-3) while as stated here, some dogs have a receptive vocabulary of 165 words.
I don't know anything about Coren- but I view a dog's intelligence as more like that of a savant - they've been bred and trained to understand certain things and achieve certain tasks, and those that they can do, they do really well, but there are many things they don't and will never have the potential to learn (unlike a human two year old).
I mean DAMN - just think for a moment of all the things a human two year old has to absorb and learn in that very short space of time.
Quote:This article has some nasty implications for humans. If some breeds (read races) are mentally superior to others, does that apply to humans? If we have bred dogs to be superior, does that mean that as humans self select mates for intelligence, looks or athletic ability that we are evolving sub races of humans?
Well not to be politically incorrect and I understand your concern, but isn't that what people do anyway?
When I was pregnant, I had to go for genetic counseling because I'd had a brother with learning difficulties and I'd stated that on my form when I went for my initial visit. They asked me if his problem was genetic or congenital and I explained that, no, it was not genetic- he was deprived of oxygen during his birth.
There was an audible sigh of relief in the room and I could have been very sensitive and offended about it - but I think it's practical to know and think about what living hell you may be exposing your potential offspring to.
For instance, if you and your spouse are both Jewish and you know that you're both Tay Sachs carriers (or black and Sickle cell anemia carriers)- would you take a chance and have a child or would you adopt?
I think I'd adopt- in fact I KNOW I would.