Y IS SEXUAL ACTIVITY HELD IN ABHORENCE ?

BY WHAT REASONING
IS SEXUAL ACTIVITY HELD IN ABHORENCE, in COMMON PARLANCE ?

For instance, if a carpenter accidentally hits his hand with a hammer,
he may well shout out: "O, ****!" to no one in particular.

In times of fierce anger, a man may CONFRONT another for perceived abuses,
in such language as: "u ******* son-of-a-bitch . . . ."
By calling him a "son-of-a-bitch"
he thereby accuses his victim and his mother of being dogs,
but he implies that the dog is particularly foul if he is involving himself in sexual activity.

If the same act is described as:
1 ) having sex, or
2) sexual union, that is deemed OK,
but if its referred to by (centuries old) slang, as "*******" that is the occasion for umbrage.
WILL SOMEONE EXPLAIN TO ME WHAT THE DIFFERENCE IS?


Dissatisfaction or a nasty mood is ofen expressed in sexual language,
e.g.: "where 's the ******* Dept. of Motor Vehicles?"
I coud see the logic if a potential customer were to ask:
"where 's the ******* Brothel?" That 's a reasonable question.


In an effort to convay the concept that some person or something
is loathsome remarks intimating masturbation r ofen attributed to him
or it; FOR WHAT REASON ? WHAT 's the connection ?


In general parlance,
slang remarks refer to sexual conduct as tho it is an abomination. Y ?


These psychological n sociological fenomena also seem to be age sensitive;
i.e., such expressions r received differently
when issued by children as distinct from adults.

Y is this ?

R these the expressions of disgruntled zealots for celebacy ?

I don 't frackin understand!





David