@sozobe,
sozobe wrote:I know a PC would be cheaper, may still go that direction. Mostly looking for "no don't do that!!", negatives re: the Macs I have in mind that I might not be aware of.
The only one that I thought of was that if you are going to go 13" you might as well get the Macbook instead of the Macbook pro. It will perform well enough, and although it isn't nearly as pretty (white plastic vs brushed aluminum) it is the cheaper, entry-level version of Mac laptops and the only real reason I'd avoid them is the limitation to the 13" screen.
I'd also make sure to get an Intel-based Mac, as there are some nifty things those are compatible with that previous hardware architectures aren't.
But honestly, for your uses any Mac available will perform well enough. So it's mainly form factor and price. But you can get a new PC laptop from between $300 to $700 that will be pretty solid too (don't get me wrong, I get why people use Macs and I think you'd enjoy the PC experience less, I'm just saying that cost is the biggest reason not to get a Mac and that from a cost perspective PC really is a better deal).
On the cheap end you can get a Mac Mini and connect it to a cheap screen and probably be set for around $800. But I happen to agree with you that you need a laptop (I think you'd get more use out of a computer that way) instead of a desktop.
Quote:I think you're right about 13" vs 15", the one I have now is 15". That does up the price by quite a bit (over-13" models have more memory too), the discount helps though.
Yeah, I recommend the 15" size as a good mix between screen real estate and portability (13" for me becomes uncomfortable to work on, and 17" becomes uncomfortable to carry).
Quote:I don't buy new computers often (this one is my second one ever!) so I'll probably go brand-new to drag out its usefulness for as long as possible. I have $500 to play with (a gift earmarked for a new computer) so could get something good for about $700 of my own money.
What I was trying to explain is that in the last few years computers have become much better able to stand the test of time. When I started able2know I wanted a new computer every year, because the processor speeds were still low enough that there was legitimate improvement to be had, and also because processor speeds were doubling so quickly.
These days the power of personal computers has outgrown any software we use, and the processors aren't getting faster at the same rate. So basically now I can get away with using the same computer for many years, and barely even pay attention to the CPU when I buy a computer. Any CPU from 2006 onwards is enough for all but the most demanding of uses.
So for $700 you can get a top of the line new PC laptop that I think will be fine for you for many years (e.g. I can realistically see you using it without major gripes in 5 years) or you can get a Mac at about double that price new or about that price used. And with that budget between those choices I would go used to be honest, a year-old Mac knocks a huge amount off the price and won't really last you significantly less than a new one and you may be able to get more computer for your money by going slightly used instead of new.