@Setanta,
												I haven't researched this particular case, Setanta. But  evolution is a gradual process, and that the line-drawing between the first 
homo sapiens and her 
homo rhodensis parents is somewhat arbitrary. So I'm 
guessing there is some discrepancy in the definition of 
homo sapiens that accounts for this 200,000 year difference. Discrepancies like this aren't so uncommon.
... and of course, there's always typos. Even in 
Nature.
EDIT: Given the context in which the 400,000 years show up in the article, I think what they are saying is that the last common ancestor of 
homo sapiens and 
homo neanderthalensis lived 400,000 years ago. This common ancestor, or his daughter who is an ancestor of all 
homo sapienses but no 
homo neanderthalensises,  would not necessarily have been classified as 
homo sapiens by a taxonomist.