it does not matter, foreign people will not trade with us if we can not be counted on to pay our debts. After our failure to pay would need to pay up front for each transaction, in someone else's coin, to get product.
And I thought the issue was weapons of mass destruction. There weren't any...
Saddam Hussein had all the **** trucked out to Syria where it still is.
i think 'huge overreaction' is a massive understatement.
Bin Laden is a Saudi
The pilots who flew the planes were mostly Saudi
None of the pilots were Iraqi
So who did the US invade?
EErrrr...... oh yeah Iraq....
The US were overflying the country the whole time.
Former MI5 chief: Response to 9/11 was 'huge overreaction'
One other question:
How does a total blithering idiot get to be chief of MI5 these days?
Act of war it wasn't.
For a war to exist, whole countries have to be involved.
They weren't. It was an act of terrorism.
Well, the Bush administration cited
Saddam Hussein's WMD program as casus belli.
Do yourselves a favour and watch Fahrenheit 9/11
"I'm often asked why we're in Iraq when Saddam Hussein was not
responsible for the 9/11 attacks. The answer is that the regime of
Saddam Hussein was a clear threat. My administration, the Congress,
and the United Nations saw the threat -- and after 9/11, Saddam's
regime posed a risk that the world could not afford to take.
The world is safer because Saddam Hussein is no longer in power."
I'm having trouble understanding why someone thinks
they need to change history and call it an overraction to 9/11.