18
   

In the A2K playground: Play the Synbot game today!

 
 
nimh
 
  4  
Reply Mon 6 Oct, 2008 06:47 pm
@OCCOM BILL,
OCCOM BILL wrote:

This leaves a member the option of tolerating purposely offensive ****

Ignoring Not Equal tolerating.

In fact, it's by responding to him that you give him exactly what he wants. That you're rewarding him. Which is an odd thing to do for someone you disdain.

But if people will forgive my digression, your post is interesting at least in its illustration of how people's views on foreign policy are more often that not fundamentally the expressions of their character rather than any specific political conviction.

You see a bad guy, you wanna confront him and punch him, basically. Even though thats not necessarily the thing that will do the most good, or might well do more bad than good. And when pointed out that this is not in fact the best way to deal with the problem by rational standards in the case at hand, you see that as showing weakness, and rage at the cowardliness of it, basically.

There's some paraphrasing on my part there, of course, but this serves as surprisingly equal descriptions of your take on Synron now and your take on Iraq ca. 2003.
dlowan
 
  3  
Reply Mon 6 Oct, 2008 07:35 pm
@OCCOM BILL,
I don't know as you look like an asshole for responding.

I get why some people feel strongly about not feeding the trolls, and encourage others not to do it, but I don't think anyone has said you're an asshole if you respond. I think we all have responded at length at times, until we got sick of it, or because we enjoyed it. I know I used to respond a lot to some, either because they really irked me, or because it could be kind of fun. I remember arguing one of them into the ground about something for fun, until HE got tired of it. But generally, I am too grumpy to last long with trolls because I get really pissed off.

Anyhoo...you obviously feel very strongly about this,so there is likely no point in discussing it more.
Below viewing threshold (view)
OCCOM BILL
 
  -2  
Reply Mon 6 Oct, 2008 08:03 pm
@SYNRON,
SYNRON wrote:

Ocome Bill said that if I were in his home town I would come face to face with him and the **** would stop. Tell me where your home town is, Asshole and, if you are not carrying a weapon, I will beat you to a pulp. How tall are you? How much do you weigh? Do you have any knowledge of martial arts?

I would love to take you up on your offer. Where can I meet you?

I am sure that you have me on ignore. Wont someone tell this pipsqueak that I have taken his dare?

I would, however, ask him to sign a release before we got into it. I would not want to be sued for beating him to a pulp.

Will someone pass this on to the jerk!
Like I said on the other thread; My name is Bill Ward and I live it Cedarburg, Wi. Who are you? Where do you live? And why don't you post a picture so people can recognize you if they see your tough self?
0 Replies
 
OCCOM BILL
 
  0  
Reply Mon 6 Oct, 2008 08:23 pm
@nimh,
nimh wrote:

OCCOM BILL wrote:

This leaves a member the option of tolerating purposely offensive ****

Ignoring Not Equal tolerating.

In fact, it's by responding to him that you give him exactly what he wants. That you're rewarding him. Which is an odd thing to do for someone you disdain.

But if people will forgive my digression, your post is interesting at least in its illustration of how people's views on foreign policy are more often that not fundamentally the expressions of their character rather than any specific political conviction.

You see a bad guy, you wanna confront him and punch him, basically. Even though thats not necessarily the thing that will do the most good, or might well do more bad than good. And when pointed out that this is not in fact the best way to deal with the problem by rational standards in the case at hand, you see that as showing weakness, and rage at the cowardliness of it, basically.

There's some paraphrasing on my part there, of course, but this serves as surprisingly equal descriptions of your take on Synron now and your take on Iraq ca. 2003.
That's not exactly true, Nimh. I don't want to punch anybody that doesn't really need punching. Even then, I'd prefer someone else did it. I am even inclined to stand down if a situation can be solved in other ways. It was a rarity when I ever had to physically throw people out of my bar; but that was infinitely preferable to ever having a fight in it... which I never did... if you don't count the couple idiots that tried to take a cut at me as I escorted them out the door. 90% of the time; asking from close proximity with an unhappy look on my face, “would you like to leave the way you came in? Or the back of a squad car?” Worked like a charm. I do consider it my responsibility to provide an environment devoid of aggressive assholes in every business I've ever owned or managed.

The problem here, just like Iraq if you must, is that NO ONE is taking out the trash. I described in detail, in my first post, the one everyone seems to have ignored, a relatively easy way to set up a fair algorithm to handle it. But yes, if I find myself somewhere where no one is enforcing any rules; then yes... natural rules apply. That hardly makes me the testy idiot who's looking for a fight… like you've described. That is precisely the guy who isn’t allowed in any place I’m in charge of… and where he does hang out, I don’t.


Rockhead
 
  1  
Reply Mon 6 Oct, 2008 08:29 pm
@OCCOM BILL,
Promised meself I was done here, but...

O'Bill and I agree here.

(sorry)
0 Replies
 
OCCOM BILL
 
  0  
Reply Mon 6 Oct, 2008 08:32 pm
@dlowan,
dlowan wrote:
Anyhoo...you obviously feel very strongly about this,so there is likely no point in discussing it more.
It was just my turn to get aggravated. I've seen virtually every poster on this thread spend some time feeding trolls, so it irks me a bit when they turn around and get on others for doing it. What really irks me though, is the inexplicable tolerance being showed this troll by management. IMO, Robert is doing himself a disservice to cater to trolls rather than those who would rather not suffer trolls any more than necessary. At some point, IMO, that will result in a net loss of traffic... and certainly enjoyable experience.
Below viewing threshold (view)
Below viewing threshold (view)
ehBeth
 
  -2  
Reply Mon 6 Oct, 2008 09:04 pm
@SYNRON,
sei mal ruhig
MontereyJack
 
  0  
Reply Mon 6 Oct, 2008 09:10 pm
Dear Synron,
So you told Bill to put up or shut up. And he put up. So what are you gonna do? Who are YOU? Where are YOU? You gonna put 'em up and rise to his challenge, or all you just bluff and bluster, buster?
Below viewing threshold (view)
Below viewing threshold (view)
Robert Gentel
 
  3  
Reply Mon 6 Oct, 2008 09:27 pm
@OCCOM BILL,
OCCOM BILL wrote:
The problem here, just like Iraq if you must, is that NO ONE is taking out the trash.


You aren't taking out the trash Bill, you are spreading it around and joining in the trolling.

Quote:
IMO, Robert is doing himself a disservice to cater to trolls rather than those who would rather not suffer trolls any more than necessary.


I'm not catering to anyone Bill, you guys have to be adults and figure things out for yourselves.
MontereyJack
 
  0  
Reply Mon 6 Oct, 2008 09:27 pm
No, he's saying the baseball bat is under the bar, and telling you to cowboy up or shut up.
0 Replies
 
MontereyJack
 
  0  
Reply Mon 6 Oct, 2008 09:29 pm
And I remember a few years ago you were telling us your name was Michael Massagatto. Jose Hernandez. Riiiigggghhhhtttt.
0 Replies
 
OCCOM BILL
 
  -1  
Reply Mon 6 Oct, 2008 09:29 pm
First it's, "I don't know how to post a picture." Then with instructions it's "I don't have a picture." The truth is you're a fake. An anonymous coward who likes to run his mouth, probably from the safety of your mom’s basement. Good day.
OCCOM BILL
 
  -2  
Reply Mon 6 Oct, 2008 09:37 pm
@Robert Gentel,
Robert Gentel wrote:

OCCOM BILL wrote:
The problem here, just like Iraq if you must, is that NO ONE is taking out the trash.


You aren't taking out the trash Bill, you are spreading it around and joining in the trolling.
Well, that's probably close enough to true by now.

Robert Gentel wrote:
Quote:
IMO, Robert is doing himself a disservice to cater to trolls rather than those who would rather not suffer trolls any more than necessary.


I'm not catering to anyone Bill, you guys have to be adults and figure things out for yourselves.
Yes... you are Robert. I'm sure you have your reasons but I don't think you're doing yourself any favors. Anyhoo... before getting distracted by the troll, I did have some suggestions you might find useful here.
Or not. I'm sure you're sick and tired of suggestions too. I would be by now.
Below viewing threshold (view)
OCCOM BILL
 
  1  
Reply Mon 6 Oct, 2008 11:22 pm
On another thread
JoefromChicago wrote:
Uh, Mason, you forgot: you're supposed to be SYNRON.

Poor Possum. All those identities. It must be confusing.
Add another to your list, Nimh. That was fast. Rolling Eyes
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

WHAT THE BLOODY HELL - Question by Setanta
THIS PLACE SUCKS ! ! ! - Discussion by Setanta
wasteful nasa - Question by hater
Whats the deal with Jgoldman10? - Question by MorganBieber
OBVIOUS TROLL - Question by Setanta
Speed of light revisited yet still again - Question by dalehileman
Men Are Bad, Baaaaaaaaaaad. - Question by nononono
Even mathematics isn't certain anymore! - Discussion by Quehoniaomath
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/02/2024 at 10:53:01