Andy CWS wrote:Your numbers don't chime very well, though. With only seven grains (+- 120ppm) hard and typical chlorine, I just wonder how you could have 1200ppm TDS.
Something else must be in the equation or the test numbrs are inaccurate.
I fully agree.
Andy CWS wrote:The number of people and baths in your case make no difference in the equipment recommendation I made with the twin-tank system. Single tanks systems may have to compensate for that. Andy Christensen, CWS-II
Not true and to prove it, here's what you have said previously in this thread above about your Kinetico softener:
Andy CWS wrote:Its flow rate is 11 gpm with a peak flow of 15.
Please explain what that means since you disagree with me and now say that the number of people and bathrooms "makes no difference". Also explain how "single tank systems compensate for that".
Also, you said:
Andy CWS wrote:The 2040 has a salt efficiency of 5222 grains per pound of salt. It uses only one pound per regeneration and only 7 gallons in a 11 minutes.
Question, how many regenerations per day or per week will the Kinetico 2040 have to do for djl's family with 7 gpg hard water?
That data will give djl an accurate means to compare Kinetico's supposed salt and water savings to regular softeners that on average regenerate only once per week.
You also said:
Andy CWS wrote:The twin tank performance allows it to regenerate immediately and this provides endless, continuous service. A single tank softener can remove perhaps 27,000 in a 24 hour period. The Kinetico can remove more than 300,000 grains in the same period. This will never be needed but it shows the ability.
This is just a salesman's hype but, it goes to my last question above:
How many regenerations must the Kinetico 2040 do to remove 300,000 grains of hardness in 24 hours?
Andy CWS wrote:Expect to use it for 25 - 30 years under normal operations.
As they should but many do not. I have replaced many Kinetico softeners that were only 10-15 years old. Mostly because of the rip off prices the one'n only local dealer wanted to 'fix' them, and, their insistence that they won't sell the parts and give instructions to the DIYer that wants to save money and fix their softener themselves.
Why is it that most all other softener or control valve manufacturers have troubleshooting and repair instructions on the internet and Kinetico refuses to do the same?
Could it be so folks don't see all those small tiny very close tolerance inexpensive blow molded plastic gears the Kinetico control valve uses to get their non electric centuries old water power technology to work? And the difficulty in 'fixing' their control valves?
I probably should mention the cheap float in the salt tank they use to set the salt dose lbs., and that it, and the brine line, is under full main line water pressure at all times except when the softener is in the brine draw cycle position of a regeneration. That's a very cheap design; like most of the big box store brand softeners. Or.. that you can not change the hardness setting without taking the control valve apart and changing a disc to another certain numbered disc; that only the one'n only local dealer can sell you and will usually insist on doing it for you for a high priced service call.
So Andy, why are Kinetico softeners so expensive when they use the same resin and salt tanks and resins that most other softeners use?
h20man, why are Ecowater brand softeners so expensive when most of all the parts are the same as on/in the big box store brand Kenmore, GE, Whirlpool, North Star and mortonsalt.com softeners?