0
   

Gender Seperation Gains Speed

 
 
Reply Sat 14 Jun, 2008 10:05 pm
Quote:

.......As the movement grows, so does debate over whether boys and girls really do learn better separately. Research remains slim on whether single-sex education boosts achievement in public schools. Most studies have examined private schools.

Proponents of same-sex schooling argue that girls and boys are too often shortchanged by coed classrooms and that students from lower-income families deserve access to learning environments once exclusive to private schools. Advocates also cite emerging research that indicates gender differences in brains and cognitive development.

"We as a nation do not understand gender difference and . . . regard it as politically incorrect to discuss it," said Leonard Sax, founder of the single-sex education association and author of "Why Gender Matters." As a result, he said, schools are not helping students reach their potential. "We are unintentionally pushing girls out of computer science, and pushing boys out of subjects" such as arts and languages. He contends that single-sex schooling can reverse the trend.

But many feminists and civil rights leaders cite a long history of separate and unequal education for girls, and argue that segregation will perpetuate damaging stereotypes. The American Civil Liberties Union and five Kentucky families with middle school students filed a lawsuit in May against the U.S. Department of Education and others alleging that the school's single-sex program violates federal anti-discrimination law and is unconstitutional......
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/06/14/AR2008061401869.html?hpid=moreheadlines
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 2,963 • Replies: 23
No top replies

 
aidan
 
  1  
Reply Sun 15 Jun, 2008 05:31 am
From my own experience and observation (both as a student and a teacher) I can think of more pros than cons concerning this concept.

And I don't think that separate but unequal as it would apply to women would automatically be the default reality anymore.
0 Replies
 
Francis
 
  1  
Reply Sun 15 Jun, 2008 06:32 am
Hawkeye wrote:
Gender Seperation Gains Speed


Is this akin to desperation?
0 Replies
 
Miller
 
  1  
Reply Sun 15 Jun, 2008 06:34 am
Gender separation provides an excellent breeding ground for homosexuality, doesn't it?
0 Replies
 
Chai
 
  2  
Reply Sun 15 Jun, 2008 06:42 am
um......no


however, miller, now that you have brought this up....

I have always been under the impression you are a lesbian.

So why would this be a problem for you?
0 Replies
 
Francis
 
  0  
Reply Sun 15 Jun, 2008 06:48 am
Ouch! Twisted Evil
0 Replies
 
Chai
 
  0  
Reply Sun 15 Jun, 2008 06:52 am
shewolf and I must be mind melding this morning francis.
0 Replies
 
Francis
 
  0  
Reply Sun 15 Jun, 2008 06:58 am
I can see that! Very Happy
0 Replies
 
shewolfnm
 
  1  
Reply Sun 15 Jun, 2008 07:39 am
That is kinda creepy/cool.

I had no idea what was in this thread.. but obviously Chai, with her vulcan mind powers and her banana clip on her eyes , could see right through every thread and saw that I was saying the same thing


wow

esp is amazing between non lesbians.
I wonder what life is like for real lesbians?
0 Replies
 
Chai
 
  0  
Reply Sun 15 Jun, 2008 07:48 am
That's not a banana clip.

It's a quantum trans dimensional optic device.


I got it on Amazon, free shipping.
0 Replies
 
shewolfnm
 
  0  
Reply Sun 15 Jun, 2008 07:56 am
only a lesbian would say that.......
0 Replies
 
Mame
 
  2  
Reply Sun 15 Jun, 2008 07:58 am
Several years ago I watched a multi-part BBC documentary on how the genders learn. It was fascinating. The studies were carried out to discover why fewer boys were graduating and entering university, actually.

The study began with infants and went up through the ages until the end of high school.

It concluded that boys and girls do learn differently, and that previously (prior to 1970, say), the educational system focussed on methods geared to boys' learning style. Then they realized girls were not doing as well as they ought so teaching methods focussed on girls' learning style. What resulted was that fewer boys were graduating and entering university.

When girls were paired with boys for specific tasks (science projects, math questions, writing a story), both learned better.

One funny scenario: they had plasticine at tables in a kindergarten class and when they let the kids into the room, the girls congregated together and made little families and houses with the plasticine, while the boys were stabbing the stuff with pencils and ripping it apart and throwing it at each other. The camera pan of the tables at the end was hilarious. The girls' tables were neat and tidy while the boys' tables were a debacle.

Another interesting one was they had 5 yr olds who had been raised in homes where there were no gender-specific toys (no guns, no dolls)... again, they let them into a room full of gender-specific toys and the boys all ran to the trucks and toy guns and the girls went immediately to the cribs and dolls. So, apparently it makes no difference how you raise you kids that way - the genders are just wired differently.

I wish I could find that documentary - it was really interesting. I'd like to see it again.
0 Replies
 
Francis
 
  0  
Reply Sun 15 Jun, 2008 08:16 am
Mame wrote:
The girls' tables were neat and tidy while the boys' tables were a debacle.

I came to the conclusion that boys don't like plasticine...

Was there something else to understand?
0 Replies
 
shewolfnm
 
  0  
Reply Sun 15 Jun, 2008 08:16 am
I will look that up too. It sounds facinating.

Little Bean has no gender specific toys ... in abundance.. if that makes sense.

She has a set of army men ( those little plastic ones that hurt your feet at 1am)
4 my little pony toys
1 large plastic house
many blocks .. wood, plastic, foam..
Original lincoln log set ( moms proud of that one Smile )
several small metal cars, trucks, dumptrucks
4 stuffed animals that she sleeps with
and art supplies coming out her behind..

At day care she is quick to play with boys, and be a very physical child.

She has only one girl friend, but does not play house, dolls or any other dress up type game.
She does love dresses, but she rips them off to climb a tree

She is very 'tom' boyish and I would , with out knowing the specifics, say she too learns like a boy.

( oh my god Shocked I have a lesbian )
im kidding people.. get yer knickers out of a bunch..
0 Replies
 
littlek
 
  2  
Reply Sun 15 Jun, 2008 08:26 am
This is indeed an interesting theory. The interaction between boys and girls changes while they develop. Some years they are more obviously socially or academically at different stages. Some years hormones make it hard to work together.

Here's the rub: getting through the difficult parts is what makes people resilient. In other words, when gender first becomes an issue, it's minor, they learn to deal with it and carry on. That gives them tools to deal with more complicated gender issues later on. It's a spiraling cycle.
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  2  
Reply Sun 15 Jun, 2008 08:48 am
And my big thing here is that there are tendencies but no universals. There are boys who learn "like girls" and girls who learn "like boys."

Educational systems that work well with a variety of learning styles seems a better and more effective idea, to me, than just plain segregating by gender.
0 Replies
 
hawkeye10
 
  0  
Reply Sun 15 Jun, 2008 09:19 am
American education is a disaster, after endless reforms and changes in teaching theory over the last 50 years, after gobs of money spent, we have a system that produces HS Grads that are about 30th best in the world. Plus about a third never graduate. Why do we do so poorly?

I think that gender differences do matter, girls and boys learn better with different approaches plus are ready for particular subject matter at different times. But I think that the most significant problems are created by the culture in the coed schools. Middle schools (7th-8th) are where we lose these kids, as their hormones start to take over. Trying to be attractive to the opposite sex and trying to navigate relationships with the opposite sex sucks up energy, and for many begins to become more important than the project of learning.

High School culture is where for decades now the social is more important than the education for very many kids. I think only about 30% are serious about obtaining an education, the other 70% is passing time or more interested in perfecting their social skills.

Separating the sexes will not solve all of the problems, but it will help. We don't want a balkanization of the gender separation because kids need to learn about the opposite sex. The idea of being separated part of the day every day for core classes makes a lot of sense to me. I would like to see some test programs run and studied. We have spent two generations throwing money and new teaching theories at the schools and nothing improves, I think it is time to look at the culture with-in the schools, consider that the culture might be the primary problem. Separating the boys and the girls will change the culture instantly.
0 Replies
 
Francis
 
  1  
Reply Sun 15 Jun, 2008 09:40 am
hawkeye10 wrote:
Trying to be attractive to the opposite sex and trying to navigate relationships with the opposite sex sucks up energy, and for many begins to become more important than the project of learning.

Why is it so in the American society?

It just means that you don't have an educational problem but a social skills' problem..


hawkeye10 wrote:
Separating the sexes will not solve all of the problems, but it will help.

Like wearing a burqa?

It will have pervert effects as it has in some countries where this separation is enforced.



hawkeye10 wrote:
I would like to see some test programs run and studied.

You could check out all the studies that have been made in Europe these last 60 years that lead to the opposite conclusions as yours.

These very same ideas are the kind of politicians like to release. Let's try this, even though it has been proved unsuccessful elsewhere.

Then, they will find some excuse to justify the their failure.
0 Replies
 
Mame
 
  1  
Reply Sun 15 Jun, 2008 09:58 am
Francis wrote:
hawkeye10 wrote:
I would like to see some test programs run and studied.

You could check out all the studies that have been made in Europe these last 60 years that lead to the opposite conclusions as yours.

These very same ideas are the kind of politicians like to release. Let's try this, even though it has been proved unsuccessful elsewhere.


Yes, good point, Francis - what I always wonder is why every country has to reinvent the wheel. Why not just look at previous studies.

I am thinking of the British heroin addiction program, at the moment, as well as the Icelandic fisheries industry. They came to Canada to provide some guidance and one of the things they reported was that there were more people in the Fisheries Department than there were fish!
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Sun 15 Jun, 2008 10:09 am
Perhaps it only works in Iceland - more fishes than persons in the Fisheries Department, I mean.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Do you remember English 101? - Discussion by plainoldme
Teaching English in Malaysia - Discussion by annifa
How to hire a tutor? - Question by boomerang
How to inspire students to quit smoking? - Discussion by dagmaraka
Plagiarism or working together - Discussion by margbucci
Adventures in Special Education - Discussion by littlek
The Disadvantages of an Elite Education - Discussion by Shapeless
I'm gonna be an teeture - Discussion by littlek
What Makes A Good Math Teacher - Discussion by symmetry
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Gender Seperation Gains Speed
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.12 seconds on 12/21/2024 at 07:35:32