@JLNobody,
By your logic, BillRM we shouldn't pursue and imprison human serial killers because they kill so few people each year.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I would guess off hand that any serial killer worth the name would kill 30 or so all by himself.
BKT and Ted B had a number higher then 30 if memory serve me correctly all by themselves and the two Washington area snipers had a plus 20 kill rate if memory also serve me correctly.
In any case why do we not ban all mature males from families as that is where the most danger come from in any family with or without a pit bulls living with them? Human adults males are a far greater danger then all the dogs that will ever be born!
By the way assuming we could ban and enforce such a ban of the pit bull breed and the death rate from dogs attacks did not go down what would be the next step IE what dog breed would you go after next?
The Dobeman the old evil dog that would turn on his human without reason? There is even an old horror movie showing a pack of killer Dobemans going wild you should see it as I am sure that would drive you to ban that breed next.
If not how about the Rottweiler or the Chow Chow or even the dog with the real worst record for human attacks the big and friendly German Shepherd?
Maybe banning all breeds larger then 20 pounds would be your next step?
Silly people we always had risks in life and if you wish to ban everything from the home that could result in a death rate of 30 a year we would have no homes of any kind.
What kind of a power trip are you people on that allow you to tell others what low level risk they are free to run in their own homes by the way?