cjhsa wrote:It helps to have a feel for the stats you are trying to interpret.
You were off by more than 300,000, not to mention that you attempted to imply that a million deer are taken each year, when in fact in 2006, it was fewer than half a million. As that represented an increase over previous years, it's obvious that the kill did not even closely approach half a million in previous years. An error margin of more than three hundred thousand is not close at all.
It helps to
know the statistics, and not to just feel around for them.