1
   

Foxboro, Massachusetts - 1:00 PM - DECEMBER 9, 2007

 
 
Reply Mon 3 Dec, 2007 11:07 pm
How the hell did Baltimore just lose that game? I am going to puke. The Patriots did NOT just win that game. No f---ing way.

Except they did. When they called the time out before stopping the Patriots on 4th down, I thought I was gonna **** myself. Then on the next 4TH down, they get called for interference. I actually did **** myself. Then, when the Patriots finally scored that touchdown (but was that really a touchdown? I don't think so, but whatcha gonna do) and dufus got the double fifteen-yard penalties, I reached back and grabbed a clump of crap from my jockey shorts and started flinging it around the room. Then, when the Ravens threw the ball down the field on the last play of the game and the guy caught it at the THREE YARD LINE but couldn't score, well, I can't even tell you what I did, but let me just say, my neighbors are NOT amused.

Good. The Steelers get to knock these bastards off now.

At 1:00 PM eastern standard time, December 9th, 2007, it is on, baby!

My prediction: STEELERS 33 PATRIOTS 30

Ben had better play well this week, or I'm going to look like a real jagoff here...
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 6,267 • Replies: 64
No top replies

 
dagmaraka
 
  1  
Reply Mon 3 Dec, 2007 11:19 pm
steelers and patriots are not badminton teams? who knew?
0 Replies
 
Rockhead
 
  1  
Reply Mon 3 Dec, 2007 11:36 pm
Glad I'm not Kicky's flippin' housekeeper. Rolling Eyes

Kick, for the Steeler's to win, we need to start Charlie Batch.....trust me, I got this figgerred out. :wink:

RH
0 Replies
 
kickycan
 
  1  
Reply Tue 4 Dec, 2007 02:47 pm
Ha! Charlie Batch is not a bad QB at all. Ben is good when he's good, but when he's off, he sucks my...anyway, I just hope he's having one of his hot days. If so, it's in the bag!
0 Replies
 
Francis
 
  1  
Reply Tue 4 Dec, 2007 02:51 pm
I cannot believe people are addicted to such ridiculous game! Twisted Evil
0 Replies
 
George
 
  1  
Reply Tue 4 Dec, 2007 03:03 pm
Francis wrote:
I cannot believe people are addicted to such ridiculous game! Twisted Evil

Sure you can.
This is struggle, triumph, passion, and pagentry!
This is Atlas, Sysiphus, Tantalus and Prometheus!
This is the metaphor for all human striving!
This is FOOTBALL!
0 Replies
 
George
 
  1  
Reply Tue 4 Dec, 2007 03:05 pm
BTW, I voted "Patriots".
And I protest your snide use of upper and lower case.
0 Replies
 
Rockhead
 
  1  
Reply Tue 4 Dec, 2007 03:05 pm
Now we know....George writes Kornheiser's pregame monologue. Laughing

I thought that rambling sounded familiar... Cool
0 Replies
 
Francis
 
  1  
Reply Tue 4 Dec, 2007 03:07 pm
And it causes dithyramb!

Poor George! Embarrassed
0 Replies
 
Region Philbis
 
  1  
Reply Tue 4 Dec, 2007 03:07 pm
the pates have the guiding hand of satan gently nudging them to perfection...
0 Replies
 
George
 
  1  
Reply Tue 4 Dec, 2007 03:12 pm
Kornheister?
Anything but that!
0 Replies
 
George
 
  1  
Reply Tue 4 Dec, 2007 03:13 pm
Dithyramb?
I thought was just a rash.
0 Replies
 
Slappy Doo Hoo
 
  1  
Reply Tue 4 Dec, 2007 03:58 pm
Stop whining, and enjoy watching the dynasty.
0 Replies
 
Slappy Doo Hoo
 
  1  
Reply Tue 4 Dec, 2007 05:08 pm
F**K the media. Why the hell are they talking about some "conspiracy" crap the NFL wants the Patriots to go undefeated???

Did any of these idiots watch the Pats/Colts game, where flags were being thrown at the Pats all day long, for penalties that didn't happen?

Last night's game was not officiated too poorly.
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Tue 4 Dec, 2007 05:19 pm
That wasn't a win it was a gift. The last touchdown that was, wasn't. The reciever was clearly out of bounds before he secured the ball.
0 Replies
 
Region Philbis
 
  1  
Reply Tue 4 Dec, 2007 05:24 pm
they took a good long look at it and determined it was a catch...

R(i thought it was a catch)P
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Tue 4 Dec, 2007 05:31 pm
Inorder for that to have been rulled a catch the rules would have had to be changed.
0 Replies
 
Slappy Doo Hoo
 
  1  
Reply Tue 4 Dec, 2007 05:51 pm
Look au, it was a judgement call on the refs part. There was no conclusive evidence to overturn the call. On the other hand, if it was originally ruled no catch, I'm sure the review would have stuck with that call too.

You can't say it was "definitely" not a catch, because for starters, you obviously don't know what the rule is on calling that play. It could have been called either way, going by the rule. He wasn't bobbling the hell out of the ball, he was just bringing it down as he was stepping out. With full "control."
0 Replies
 
kickycan
 
  1  
Reply Tue 4 Dec, 2007 08:17 pm
I didn't think it was a catch, but I don't think it would have mattered even if they'd overturned it. New England would have scored on the next play anyway. Or maybe the next one. Or maybe the next one. Either way, I'm all but certain the Ravens would have kept f*cking themselves in the ass until they got the job done.
0 Replies
 
Rockhead
 
  1  
Reply Tue 4 Dec, 2007 08:22 pm
Kicky, I feel yer pain.....

Can they just fuc**ng lose already...
(GTH Boston Twisted Evil )

RH
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Should cheerleading be a sport? - Discussion by joefromchicago
Are You Ready For Fantasy Baseball - 2009? - Discussion by realjohnboy
tennis grip - Question by madalina
How much faster could Usain Bolt have gone? - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Sochi Olympics a Resounding Success - Discussion by gungasnake
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Foxboro, Massachusetts - 1:00 PM - DECEMBER 9, 2007
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 07/14/2024 at 05:45:35