Hi All,
I'm new to the forum, looking forward to reading all the good comments from the members.
In Singapore, attempted suicide is an offence punishable by jail (see
Death in Singapore).
The reason behind is probably due to the effects caused by the attempt to the surrounding environment i.e. neighbours, etc. One could argue that the law is supportive to a better social orders, however, trying to fit into the shoes of the persone attempting suicide, is it really fair for a country to forbid him/her take his/her own life?? (i'll drop the him/her here and just use him, for general meaning).
Let's imagine for a while, a hypothetical situation about a person named John. Let's enter his life and try to view the world around as John.
John views his life as a crappy life. He is a school dropout, has an overweight problem, totally broke, hasn't paid several months of his rent, has literaly no friends and unemployed. It's not like he didn't try to fix his problems, he tried several times and failed miserably. He therefore believed that he is also emotionally crippled, he has very low amount of willpower and easily give up.
Realizing there is no bright future waiting for him, and every day's torture on being him, make him wants to take his own life.
Is it not logical for John to come to the decision of taking his own life? Excluding religious arguments, life purpose is nothing more than seeking pleasure, a chemical manipulation at the brain. Think about it, why do we want money? is it not because money can bring pleasure to our brain, thru giving us nice house, car, etc. why do we want good relationship and family, is it not because it feels good to enjoy a good relationship and hav a good family. All revolves only on satisfying the brain.
In John's case however, the brain experiences pain in daily basis with little to no hope of any turning point soon. Is it not then logical for John to take his own life? Prohibiting him so by enforcing the law is like forcing him to live a miserable life, experiencing pain every day, isn't it the same with torture? Funny don't you think, making a law to torture someone for the rest of his life. If it is the surrounding society that is need to be preserved, then why don't we make a certain organization to take care of people who wants suicide? so anyone who wants suicide can come discreetly and kill himself on an arranged place at arranged time, no body else need to know about it. So the surrounding people won't even know that John is dead. Sounds absurd I know, but it is a lot better solution than enforcing a law that torture John for the rest of his life.
What do you think?