He is kinda up there with the other people I ignore .. for a reason..
O(mygod)sig(cant spell)david, Gunga, cj....
But, if he is serious.. well.. thats just funny.
0 Replies
Mame
1
Reply
Mon 19 Nov, 2007 09:44 pm
I haven't read any of his other threads, either, but my take is he's a young, ignorant fool.
0 Replies
Mame
1
Reply
Mon 19 Nov, 2007 09:49 pm
Just did a search and I had read a couple... brought it all back to me. I'm avoiding from here on in (unless it's too good to stay out of - heh heh)... but I think you're right, shewolf - he's provocative.
0 Replies
Rockhead
1
Reply
Mon 19 Nov, 2007 09:50 pm
He's covered girls....
0 Replies
Jeremiah
1
Reply
Mon 19 Nov, 2007 10:43 pm
Whaddya mean I'm covered?
0 Replies
Rockhead
1
Reply
Mon 19 Nov, 2007 11:10 pm
HHhhmmmmmm....
what to say to look intelligent now, he says.....
0 Replies
OmSigDAVID
1
Reply
Mon 19 Nov, 2007 11:49 pm
Intrepid wrote:
This thread started, IMO, as an offence to women and Asians. I, as a male, even find this thread offensive.
The driver and passenger were ini the wrong....period.
How was the passenger " ini the wrong....period " ??
David
0 Replies
Rockhead
1
Reply
Mon 19 Nov, 2007 11:51 pm
Must you sink so low????
0 Replies
Intrepid
1
Reply
Mon 19 Nov, 2007 11:57 pm
The answer is obvious
0 Replies
OmSigDAVID
1
Reply
Mon 19 Nov, 2007 11:59 pm
Intrepid wrote:
The answer is obvious
Thank u for that information.
It is good to know that.
0 Replies
Intrepid
1
Reply
Tue 20 Nov, 2007 12:00 am
David,
Why did you delete your reply to Rockhead? You were talking about in the interest of logic - yes. Have you determined that your "logic" was no longer logical? Did you think nobody would see it?
0 Replies
OmSigDAVID
1
Reply
Tue 20 Nov, 2007 12:04 am
Intrepid wrote:
Quote:
David,
Why did you delete your reply to Rockhead?
You were talking about in the interest of logic - yes. Have you determined that your "logic" was no longer logical?
The sequence was interrupted,
causing the appearance of unresponsiveness.
Quote:
Did you think nobody would see it?
Yes.
0 Replies
Rockhead
1
Reply
Tue 20 Nov, 2007 12:05 am
David, defense of stupidity just looks stupid.
RH
0 Replies
OmSigDAVID
1
Reply
Tue 20 Nov, 2007 12:13 am
Rockhead wrote:
David, defense of stupidity just looks stupid.
RH
1 ) I did not defend stupidity; I sought to ascertain how THE PASSENGER was in the rong.
2 ) I am fearless; I am intrepid,
caring not how I look, in the service of logic.
David
0 Replies
Rockhead
1
Reply
Tue 20 Nov, 2007 12:15 am
Wait a minute, I talk with Intrepid periodically, and you are not him. I am confused, who is who....
0 Replies
OmSigDAVID
1
Reply
Tue 20 Nov, 2007 12:37 am
I am the American.
0 Replies
Rockhead
1
Reply
Tue 20 Nov, 2007 12:47 am
As am I...
Jump in anytime, Jeremiah... :wink:
0 Replies
Ticomaya
1
Reply
Tue 20 Nov, 2007 05:46 am
gustavratzenhofer wrote:
gargamel wrote:
I wouldn't let my woman anywhere NEAR my "wheels" (1995 Chevy Prism, maroon)
You have a 1995 Chevy Prism!!!
Oh....my......god!
To die for.
Why do the dorks get all the cherry cars?
[size=7](Okay ... I stole that line from an old "Night Court" episode.)[/size]
0 Replies
shewolfnm
1
Reply
Tue 20 Nov, 2007 07:04 am
i almost spit my coffee...
0 Replies
Intrepid
1
Reply
Tue 20 Nov, 2007 07:22 am
OmSigDAVID wrote:
Rockhead wrote:
David, defense of stupidity just looks stupid.
RH
1 ) I did not defend stupidity; I sought to ascertain how THE PASSENGER was in the rong.
2 ) I am fearless; I am intrepid,
caring not how I look, in the service of logic.
David
If you insist on a rational for why the passenger was in the wrong.... Sobeit.
She was wrong for drinking underage. She was wrong for getting into a car with someone who was drinking. Need anything else Einstein?
