1
   

Responsibility for a Published Financial Statement

 
 
gollum
 
Reply Tue 23 Oct, 2007 05:19 am
A publicly traded corporation publishes its financial statements with its CPA's unqualified opinion. The financial statements are later shown to be false.

Is the existence of the CPA's unqualified opinion a permissible defense by the corporation.

I realize that the CPA can also be sued but does the corporation's defense that it relied on the CPA have legal weight?
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 654 • Replies: 7
No top replies

 
Phoenix32890
 
  1  
Reply Tue 23 Oct, 2007 05:24 am
I am not an attorney, but logically, a CPA can only report the information that is given to him by the company. I really wonder, if the CPA took the figures that he accepted in good faith, can he be held responsible for any malfeasance on the part of the company?

Jes, are you around?
0 Replies
 
JPB
 
  1  
Reply Tue 23 Oct, 2007 06:42 am
Not since Enron.
0 Replies
 
roger
 
  1  
Reply Tue 23 Oct, 2007 08:16 am
No? I'm thinking that "unqualified" would mean the accountant went beyond numbers provided by the client, and beyond source documents. I answer several auditor's questions from our vendors every year.
0 Replies
 
Linkat
 
  1  
Reply Wed 24 Oct, 2007 12:14 pm
I work on financial statements and whether a report is audited or not audited does not exempt a company from liability if they incorrectly state numbers. However, you also need to determine if there is a material misstatement or not - if it is immaterial there may be no issue. Another thing to consider is if there is an error is some one harmed by it. And a final consideration is this a control issue.

Does your company certify these statements? I would imagine some one or a group of individuals certify them especially considering Sarbaones Oxley.
0 Replies
 
Mame
 
  1  
Reply Wed 24 Oct, 2007 12:42 pm
Having worked in the mining and exploration sector, and contributed to the MD&A and Financials, my answer is No, the in-house CPA is not a qualified person. All they do is provide an outside accounting firm with the figures and documentation.

All publically-traded companies MUST produce financials every quarter, and they must hire an outside company to go over their books. The financials are then required to be published on SEDAR (in Canada) and they state that they are reviewed but UNAUDITED.

Only the annual financials are required to be AUDITED, and this is done by a different accounting firm, usually hired by your outside accountants.
0 Replies
 
jespah
 
  1  
Reply Wed 24 Oct, 2007 05:00 pm
Re: Responsibility for a Published Financial Statement
gollum wrote:
A publicly traded corporation publishes its financial statements with its CPA's unqualified opinion. The financial statements are later shown to be false.

Is the existence of the CPA's unqualified opinion a permissible defense by the corporation.

I realize that the CPA can also be sued but does the corporation's defense that it relied on the CPA have legal weight?

Corp. law was never my specialty but I'll take a quick stab at it. The main thing in the fact pattern, I feel, is the fact that the company is publicly traded. It has certain obligations to its stockholders. Reliance on a CPA's unqualified opinion would probably be shown to be a material omission, thereby putting and keeping the company on the hook.

But like I said, this ain't m'specialty.
0 Replies
 
hamburger
 
  1  
Reply Wed 24 Oct, 2007 05:11 pm
the management is responsible for the financial information (statement) of the company .
the (outside) auditors add the "Shareholders' Auditors' Report" to this statement .
note , that the "auditors" are reporting to the "shareholders" and NOT the company or management .
that's one reason why the "auditors" can be sued and held be financially responsible by the "shareholders" if it can be proved that they did not do their audit job properly .
and that's what happens to more and more auditors now - so they cannot simply accept the company's financial information without performing their own tests if they want to avoid costly lawsuits .
hbg


Quote:
Management's Responsibility for Financial Information

The management of The Bank of Nova Scotia (the Bank) is responsible for the integrity and fair presentation of the financial information contained in this Annual Report. The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles. The consolidated financial statements also comply with the accounting requirements of the Bank Act.

The consolidated financial statements, where necessary, include amounts which are based on the best estimates and judgement of management. Financial information presented elsewhere in this Annual Report is consistent with that shown in the consolidated financial statements.

Management has always recognized the importance of the Bank maintaining and reinforcing the highest possible standards of conduct in all of its actions, including the preparation and dissemination of statements fairly presenting the financial condition of the Bank. In this regard, management has developed and maintains a system of accounting and reporting which provides for the necessary internal controls to ensure that transactions are properly authorized and recorded, assets are safeguarded against unauthorized use or disposition, and liabilities are recognized. The system is augmented by written policies and procedures, the careful selection and training of qualified staff, the establishment of organizational structures providing an appropriate and well-defined division of responsibilities, and the communication of policies and guidelines of business conduct throughout the Bank.

Management, under the supervision of and the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, have a process in place to evaluate disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting in line with Canadian and U.S. securities regulations.

The system of internal controls is further supported by a professional staff of internal auditors who conduct periodic audits of all aspects of the Bank's operations. As well, the Bank's Chief Auditor has full and free access to, and meets periodically with, the Audit and Conduct Review Committee of the Board of Directors. In addition, the Bank's compliance function maintains policies, procedures and programs directed at ensuring compliance with regulatory requirements, including conflict of interest rules.

The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions, Canada, which is mandated to protect the rights and interests of the depositors and creditors of the Bank, examines and enquires into the business and affairs of the Bank, as deemed necessary, to determine whether the provisions of the Bank Act are being complied with, and that the Bank is in a sound financial condition.

The Audit and Conduct Review Committee, composed entirely of outside directors, reviews the consolidated financial statements with both management and the independent auditors before such statements are approved by the Board of Directors and submitted to the shareholders of the Bank.

The Audit and Conduct Review Committee reviews and reports their findings to the Board of Directors on all related party transactions that may have a material impact on the Bank.

KPMG LLP, the independent auditors appointed by the shareholders of the Bank, have audited the 2006 consolidated financial statements of the Bank in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards and the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and have expressed their opinion upon completion of such audit in the following report to the shareholders. The Shareholders' Auditors have full and free access to, and meet periodically with, the Audit and Conduct Review Committee to discuss their audit, including any findings as to the integrity of the Bank's accounting, financial reporting and related matters.

Rick Waugh
President and Chief Executive Officer
Toronto, Canada
December 8, 2006

Luc Vanneste
Executive Vice-President
and Chief Financial Officer
----------------------------------------------------------
Shareholders' Auditors' Report

To the Shareholders of The Bank of Nova Scotia

We have audited the Consolidated Balance Sheet of The Bank of Nova Scotia (the Bank) as at October 31, 2006 and the Consolidated Statements of Income, Changes in Shareholders' Equity and Cash Flows for the year then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Bank's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards and the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform an audit to obtain reasonable assurance whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.

In our opinion, these consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Bank as at October 31, 2006 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles.

(note that it is their OPINION and NOT a statement of fact . hbg)

The Consolidated Balance Sheet as at October 31, 2005 and the Consolidated Statements of Income, Changes in Shareholders' Equity and Cash Flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended October 31, 2005, prepared in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles, were audited in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards by KPMG LLP and PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, who expressed an opinion without reservation on those statements in the Shareholders' Auditors' report dated November 29, 2005.

KPMG LLP
Chartered Accountants
Toronto, Canada
December 8, 2006
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
  1. Forums
  2. » Responsibility for a Published Financial Statement
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.07 seconds on 11/15/2024 at 10:53:25