1
   

DiD 9/11 REVEAL DEFECTS IN AMERICAN CHARACTER ?

 
 
Reply Sat 6 Oct, 2007 12:39 pm
Last nite I watched the Discovery Times Channel.

It presented an analysis of the piracy of 9/11,
( or multiple piracies thereof )
combined with a series of interviews of surviving relatives
of the kidnapped victims ( who had been in contact
by fone with their relatives on the hijacked planes )
during the attacks upon the WTC.

The surviving relatives told of receiving fone calls
from the planes wherein the victims spoke in
sad states of soft and quiet docility, peacefully accepting
the ambient state of affairs, with some female screams
audible in the background.

As we know, of the 4 hijacked planes,
only the passengers of United Airlines Flight 93
fought back and retook the plane.
The spirit of General George Patton was manifested
in the heros of United Airlines Flight 93;
thay knew that victory was to be found in COUNTERATTACK,
in merciless counterattack,
disabling and killing the alien malefactors, and avenging the murdered flight crew.
Thay became a de facto " well regulated militia " ( having no taint of government control ).

Of the remaining 3 planes,
1 hit each of the Twin Towers and the 3rd hit the Pentagon.
Thru the heroism of the passengers of United Airlines Flight 93,
only that plane of the 4,
avoided hitting a high value target ( the White House ? Congress ? )

Of course, on all of the planes, the airlines had
executed the spirit and the letter of gun control,
disarming all of the victims
, who were killed in their helplessness
a few minutes thereafter
( the passengers of United 93 being reduced to using a food cart
as their weapon, in their desperation ).
I wish, with all my heart, that the passengers on all of the planes had succeeded
in violating all of the gun control laws and had smuggled plenty of personal firepower
on board, using it to put the brakes on the Moslems when the time came.

( My own taste goes to short-barrelled caliber .44 special revolvers,
loaded with hollowpointed slugs, with W-I-D-E cavities. )
BETTER YET, I WISH THAT NO GUN CONTROL LAWS EVER EXISTED.


Even when United Airlines Flight 175 went into a power dive,
a very steep power dive, toward the Southern Tower, the passengers
( who vastly outnumbered the evil Moslems ) persisted in their pacifistic, humble submission
to the wishes of the Moslems, to whose discretion thay meekly confided their destiny.

DiD 9/11 REVEAL DEFECTS IN AMERICAN CHARACTER ?
Defects of liberal pacifism, of the cowardly spirit of gun control, and of political correctness ?
Surely the Moslem predators must have been very happy
with the absence of resistance in 3 of those planes; don 't u think ?
"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." (Edmund Burke)
The Moslems cud not have succeeded without the co-operation of their victims
( who were quite polite ).




I found it a source of shock & chagrin,
as a natural born American citizen,
that in only one of the 4 pirated jets,
did my fellow Americans opt to fight back.
In the other 3 planes,
the politically correct spirit of liberal tolerance of aliens,
and the spirit of gun control
( that means disarming the victims before the predatory event )
were flourishing, to the benefit of the alien predators.

DOES THIS BESPEAK A FLAW
IN THE AMERICAN CHARACTER ??

Defeating our Moslem enemies was to be found in co-ordinated and focused MALICE ,
tangibly executed malice, against our enemies on the planes,
as was successfully applied in United 93.

Quad Est Demonstratum:
the penalty for OBEYING gun control laws is DEATH, with no appeal.









Does this prove a need to instill CHARACTER in the young
in American schools ?

Does this prove a need to teach the young in American schools
that FREEDOM and HONOR have greater value than life itself ?

Does this prove a need to teach young American citizens
the value of fighting back and teach the disgrace of cowardice ?


Does this prove a need to instill in the young in American schools
a knowledge of the value of being armed in public at all times
and to be prepared to defend oneself
( prepared by abundant practice at weekly classes
in gunnery ranges of American public schools, in accurate
and safe firearms handling ) if the occasion therefor arises ?
Shud American public schools be required to teach armed battle tactics ?
David





`
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 512 • Replies: 7
No top replies

 
contrex
 
  1  
Reply Sat 6 Oct, 2007 01:24 pm
You sure are one crazy F-tard. Thankfully, most Americans like you are confined in state hospitals or jails (or the White House!) Please pour yourself a brimming glass of STFU. Do it now!
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Sat 6 Oct, 2007 01:27 pm
I am glad u r in France;
a good place for u.
Direct your ad hominem acrimony to the Marquis de Sade.
Let us know how your relationship with him works out.
0 Replies
 
djjd62
 
  1  
Reply Sat 6 Oct, 2007 01:33 pm
my understanding of the situation is as follows, the passengers on flight 93 were fully aware of the events surrounding the other three planes by the time they took action, this was most likely not the case with the second world trade center plane or the pentagon plane

from wikipedia:

Before the September 11, 2001 attacks, plane crews advised passengers to sit quietly in order to increase their chances to survive. An unofficial protocol emerged, in which civilians and government authorities understood that in most cases violence from the hijackers was unlikely as long as they achieved their goal (often, as during the rash of American incidents in the 1970s, a trip to Cuba).

Since the September 11 attacks, the situation for passengers and hijackers has changed. As in the situation of United Airlines Flight 93, where an airliner crashed into a field during a fight between passengers and hijackers, passengers now have to calculate the risks of passive cooperation, not only for themselves but for those on the ground. Future hijackers may encounter greater resistance from passengers, making a hijacking more unlikely but, if they happen, bloodier.
0 Replies
 
contrex
 
  1  
Reply Sat 6 Oct, 2007 01:42 pm
OmSigDAVID wrote:
Some silly trash


I guess you must have some sand to pound? Maybe in Iraq?
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Sat 6 Oct, 2007 02:10 pm
djjd62 wrote:


Quote:
my understanding of the situation is as follows, the passengers
on flight 93 were fully aware of the events surrounding the other three
planes by the time they took action,

Yes.



Quote:
this was most likely not the case
with the second world trade center plane or the pentagon plane

The point was made by the air traffics controllers
that Flight 175 was rocking n rolling around
on its way to the 2nd impact on the WTC.
The Moslem pilot was poorly skilled ( tho good enuf to get his job done ).
As he approached the Tower,
he put the plane into a steep power dive.
The passengers were vomiting.
This state of affairs demonstrates danger.

Additionally, according to the newspapers of the time,
the pirates were armed only with little plastic white knives,
which thay used to stab the flight crew and beat them to death
in the crowded cockpit; that is abnormally noisy and conspicuous.






Quote:
from wikipedia:

Before the September 11, 2001 attacks, plane crews advised passengers to sit quietly
in order to increase their chances to survive.

During my flights before then,
there was no discussion of how to deal with terrorists nor pirates;
only about inflating oxygen masks; no discussion of seating
( other than regarding near the emergency door ).




Quote:

An unofficial protocol emerged, in which civilians and government authorities understood that in most cases violence from the hijackers was unlikely as long as they achieved their goal (often, as during the rash of American incidents in the 1970s, a trip to Cuba).

Since the September 11 attacks, the situation for passengers and hijackers has changed. As in the situation of United Airlines Flight 93, where an airliner crashed into a field during a fight between passengers and hijackers, passengers now have to calculate the risks of passive cooperation, not only for themselves but for those on the ground. Future hijackers may encounter greater resistance from passengers, making a hijacking more unlikely but, if they happen, bloodier.

If that were to happen,
I 'd want the passengers to join me in killing
the Moslems as fast as possible.

Since it has already been done, the tactical element of surprize lost,
it is unlikely to be perpetrated by them again.
More likely, thay will dream up
other evil things to do; probably boms.

Do u believe that Civil Defense, including armed battle tactics,
shud be taught in American public schools ?

David
0 Replies
 
vikorr
 
  1  
Reply Sat 6 Oct, 2007 03:33 pm
Quote:
I wish, with all my heart, that the passengers on all of the planes had succeeded
in violating all of the gun control laws and had smuggled plenty of personal firepower
on board, using it to put the brakes on the Moslems when the time came.


Quote:
BETTER YET, I WISH THAT NO GUN CONTROL LAWS EVER EXISTED.


Ah yes, I can just see it now "Hello hostess. Look, I've just got this AK47 that I need to bring in my carry-on luggage. I know there's not much room, but you don't mind do you? I mean, it's my right under the constitution to bear arms you know. I mean, there could be terrorists on board....what? No no, I'm not a terrorist, just because I look middle eastern.... Keh, what do you mean what religion am I. Why I'm muslim, but hey you can't discriminate against my race nor religion you know, or I'll sue your company for everything it's worth."

There are good reasons for banning on planes. One wrong shot can kill every person on board.

My understanding of Air Marshalls is they have very exacting standards of accuracy, a small caliber weapon (and I daresay they are trained only to take shots in certain directions - away from the fuselage)

Quote:
BETTER YET, I WISH THAT NO GUN CONTROL LAWS EVER EXISTED.

End result would be many more planes falling out of the sky. In fact, once the first suicidal maniac blew a plane out of the sky, then, as appears to be the way of things, lots of copycat acts would follow.
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Sat 6 Oct, 2007 08:01 pm
contrex wrote:
OmSigDAVID wrote:
Some silly trash


I guess you must have some sand to pound? Maybe in Iraq?

Your guess is rong.

I withdrew my support from the war in Iraq,
as of the time that Saddam was captured.

Enuf is enuf.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

How can we be sure? - Discussion by Raishu-tensho
Proof of nonexistence of free will - Discussion by litewave
morals and ethics, how are they different? - Question by existential potential
Destroy My Belief System, Please! - Discussion by Thomas
Star Wars in Philosophy. - Discussion by Logicus
Existence of Everything. - Discussion by Logicus
Is it better to be feared or loved? - Discussion by Black King
 
  1. Forums
  2. » DiD 9/11 REVEAL DEFECTS IN AMERICAN CHARACTER ?
Copyright © 2021 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 11/30/2021 at 12:02:08