Don't tell me there's any proof for creationism.

Hey Parados: That little kid in the picture fits you quite nicely. I trust the diaper you're wearing is also a right good fit, and properly rigged for a right good load.

0 Replies

onthestreet wrote:

maporsche wrote:
onthestreet wrote:
It just seems that too many "educated" folk have been lied to in our universities, and have swallowed it hookline and sinker, and down they go.

The phrase is "hook, line, and sinker."

How's that for educated?

____________________________________________________________

REPLY: Not if you want to catch fish. Then you need the hook and the line connected (hookline), and the sinker. If it's hook line, there's no connection. Just an educated deralict, "forever learning and never coming to a knowledge of the truth".

Nice try.......

And to be clear I am a fisherman.

0 Replies

but he's a fisher of men...

Street - Do you care to support your claim that the higher education system is conspiring to miseducate people?

T
K
O

0 Replies

That teeny-bopper in you own pic is a very good indication of miss-education, with your glasses slipping down past your chin, your expression showing you completely dumbfounded, and then the fact that college graduates today are finding they can't even get a job. Then look at all the confusing theories of scientists and the epidemic of white collar crime. I'd call that miseducation, wherein the "educated" are only learned in the various methods of poking miss education.

Street

0 Replies

The onthestreet monicker is probably one of the terminally challenged Creationists and IDers that argue out their butts about
"no evidence"
"no fossil intermediates"
"DNA dont mean squat in phenotypic similarities"
"Ancient Ireland never had fleas till the ENglish came"

I suspect that onthe street is spendius evil twin, bufocaputo.
Id learn to just ignore him since, from his very first posts hes been ill mannered and obtuse.

0 Replies

Now, that was quite mannerly, like an old dirt farmer kicking cow **** all over the living-room floor.

0 Replies

HMMM, the name may be different but the breath's the same. Very Happy

So, in how many languages can you say
"You want fries with that?"

0 Replies

onthestreet wrote:

That teeny-bopper in you own pic is a very good indication of miss-education...

I've never been called a teeny-bopper before. But I am a good dancer and I can sing. However, I don't really like pop music, I prefer Johnny Cash.

onthestreet wrote:

...with your glasses slipping down past your chin, your expression showing you completely dumbfounded...

Put your glasses back on.

onthestreet wrote:

...and then the fact that college graduates today are finding they can't even get a job...

I had no problem. I'm in my senior year and I had a job lined up for May back in October. Great pay too.

onthestreet wrote:

...Then look at all the confusing theories of scientists and the epidemic of white collar crime...

Oh, I see. Because they are confusing to you, they must be lies. White collar crime has nothing to do with anything in this thread.

onthestreet wrote:

...I'd call that miseducation, wherein the "educated" are only learned in the various methods of poking miss education.

Did you mean "Miss Education?" If so, then yes, I am certainly educated in this area. Cool

She is very nice.

I asked for facts, you failed to deliver. Instead you gave a critique on my avatar, and a less than articulate viewpoint on college prospects.

Care to share your credentials Street?

T
K
O

0 Replies

fm wrote, in another assertion blitz-

Quote:

I suspect that onthe street is spendius evil twin, bufocaputo.
Id learn to just ignore him since, from his very first posts hes been ill mannered and obtuse.

I object to that. My posts are not in the least ill mannered and if you find them obtuse it is likely to be due to a comprehension difficulty at your end caused, I'm inclined to think, by you reading too much scientific claptrap.

0 Replies

You folks cannot begin to imagine just how goofy this joker is. Here you can read the first post which "Onthestreet" made at this site, from which i quote below:

Quote:

Hi all. I'm a lifelong member of Warren Jeff's FLDS Church, and proud of it. I was cast out for human weakness, being quite human and having sins to repent of, and glad of that opportunity also.

And:

Quote:

For a broad sweep of my Christian views, and why Christains are polygamists, those two forums will help as a reference, but I'd like to do some posting here and maybe meet some new friends, true Christians.

(Just how happy is it safe to assume that punch is?)

You thought "hookline" was good--you haven't even scratched the surface. The expression "bull goose loony" from One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest leaps to mind . . .

0 Replies

For those unfamiliar with Warren Jeffs, he was the leader of the so-called Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, and was on the FBI ten most wanted list briefly for flight to avoid prosecution--prosecution for rape as an accomplice for having arranged "marriages" of followers to underage girls. He was also indicted in Arizona for sexual conduct with minors and for incest. He was convicted in Utah and is serving a ten year sentence.

Nice company you boys keep there, BD and "real life," just your kind of loving christian.

0 Replies

Our buddy OntheStreet has his own little fan club over at a polygamy forum. This is some interesting reading. There are a few posts where he reveals what god has told him in his prayers.

http://po lygtalk.ipbfree.com/index.php?showforum=10

You have to delete the space between the o and the l

0 Replies

As is fairly well known I am not in favour of rape or being an accomplice for having arranged "marriages" of followers to underage girls and nor am I in favour of sexual conduct with minors or incest.

But no matter how I scratch my head I cannot imagine what a convinced atheist evolutionist has against any of those things assuming the minors have come of age biologically.

Maybe it is due to a Christian unconscious. I have a book, written by an American academic, I think, about Freud's Christian unconscious.

0 Replies

Yes, spendi, this is a point I've also mentioned frequently.

No matter how often the Setantas of the world tell themselves that all moral judgements are subjective, they cannot dodge the fact that they know that some things are just wrong -- regardless of anybody's opinion.

They try to convince themselves, fighting this inward appeal to an objective morality.......

.....but they cannot escape it. They know that some things are right and some things are wrong.

They know that (to be consistent with their stated position) they should allow whatever moral choices others want to make.

But they can't. They simply can't.

0 Replies

I am truly worried and deeply disturbed if the only reason you find those atrocious acts wrong is because your religion tells you it is so.

0 Replies

Whenever the Creationist ID trumpeteers begin to show the fractures of their logic, they always swing back to calling science "Atheistic", as if it matters.
FACT DOESNT NEED A SEAL OF APPROVAL, it will ultimately win out. So you can scream, name cal, yell nyah nyah all you wish. The truths and facts of science will prevail over the imposed darkness of superstition and myth.

That Polygamy site is a hoot maporsche

0 Replies

Not being religious is not th same as being for disorder.

The religious have often tried to claim a monopoly on morality, yet there is no reason to believe that religous people are more morally sound than the non-religious.

Farmerman - I agree, science is no more atheistic than it is republican, democrat, socialist etc. The atempt to brand science as the opposition of religion is a passive attmept to brand the field, and blur the facts.

I call it the "Holy Cold War."

It's a argument fought with propaganda and no facts.

T
K
O

0 Replies

RAAAAAAHHH-MEEEEYYYUNNN

0 Replies

Some silly pillock wrote-

Quote:

Not being religious is not th same as being for disorder.

Oh yes it is.

And try to spell "the" correctly next time and don't insult us by the carelessness of your address.

0 Replies

spendius wrote:

Some silly pillock wrote-

Quote:
Not being religious is not th same as being for disorder.

Oh yes it is.

Like always, your claims are unsupported and hollow. It's really pathetic. Back it up or shut up, coward.

T
K
O

0 Replies

Don't tell me there's any proof for creationism.

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know