parados wrote:
Did you or did you not use the words "unknown" and "supernatural" to describe the singularity prior to the BB? I hardly think I am "twisting your words." I only stated that you implied the unknown was supernatural by your use of both words to describe the same thing. Your asking me for a quote is what?
I also used the phrase 'actually existed'.
But you need to read the context to see that I am saying there is NO evidence that it actually existed.
So, simply saying 'aha! you used the word!' is meaningless when you ignore the context.
Well, actually it's not meaningless. It's quite revealing. It means you twist the meaning of others.
parados wrote:real life wrote:Do you get that confused because you are on meds, or because you are off of them, parados?
OK, rather than addressing any of the issues I raised you switch to ad hominems
I simply asked if you were or you weren't. I haven't been able to come up with any other explanation for your numerous bizarre posts that say:
'so then, you are now saying.........'
when I've said nothing of the kind.
I considered long and hard whether to frame the question that way, knowing you would come back and say 'it's an ad hom'.
But your outlandish posts, accusing me of saying things that bear no resemblance to what I've said, left me with few other options than to conclude some type of chemical interference.
So what's the deal, no drugs but you just can't comprehend English?
If you want to know what I said and when I said it, then go back and read it in context.
Then post my quote with the proper context, don't just say 'you said this' or 'you used this word'.
But you don't do this. You ignore the context.
You spin in circles, weaving your confused accounts of what you would like others to think I said.
And I expect you to continue.
So, let's get the top spinning again.
Hey, parados, I used the word 'scientific' when discussing the BB.
Why don't you say that I contradicted myself and I claimed that the singularity is actually scientific.