Don't tell me there's any proof for creationism.

real life wrote:

TheCorrectResponse wrote:

Its funny you know more about science than people trained in science you know more about anthropology than people training in anthropology

Strawman

You need to refamiliarize yourself with the definition of a strawman.

TheCorrectResponse wrote:

real life wrote:

TheCorrectResponse wrote:

Its funny you know more about science than people trained in science you know more about anthropology than people training in anthropology

Strawman

You need to refamiliarize yourself with the definition of a strawman.

If you can show where I've said any of this nonsense you've concocted, then I'll withdraw the charge.

real life wrote:

TheCorrectResponse wrote:

real life wrote:

TheCorrectResponse wrote:

Its funny you know more about science than people trained in science you know more about anthropology than people training in anthropology

Strawman

You need to refamiliarize yourself with the definition of a strawman.

If you can show where I've said any of this nonsense you've concocted, then I'll withdraw the charge.

Considering he didn't make an argument it can't be a strawman. Nor did he make a claim that you had said something specific.

parados wrote:

real life wrote:

TheCorrectResponse wrote:

real life wrote:

TheCorrectResponse wrote:

Its funny you know more about science than people trained in science you know more about anthropology than people training in anthropology

Strawman

You need to refamiliarize yourself with the definition of a strawman.

If you can show where I've said any of this nonsense you've concocted, then I'll withdraw the charge.

Considering he didn't make an argument it can't be a strawman. Nor did he make a claim that you had said something specific.

Oh I see.

So if you simply imply something, or leave a false impression, then it's not really deceptive or lying , is it?

(Are you running for office?)

real life wrote:

parados wrote:

real life wrote:

TheCorrectResponse wrote:

real life wrote:

TheCorrectResponse wrote:

Its funny you know more about science than people trained in science you know more about anthropology than people training in anthropology

Strawman

You need to refamiliarize yourself with the definition of a strawman.

If you can show where I've said any of this nonsense you've concocted, then I'll withdraw the charge.

Considering he didn't make an argument it can't be a strawman. Nor did he make a claim that you had said something specific.

Oh I see.

So if you simply imply something, or leave a false impression, then it's not really deceptive or lying , is it?

It might be deceptive or lying but it isn't a strawman.

Its neither deceptive or lying. The facts that I have stated re: science, can be found in any relevant text book. They are facts very few if any trained in science would disagree with. The Books that deal with anthropology/mythology ditto. You say all this is wrong and you are correct which led to my comment.

You have no end of contrived excuses for not answering direct questions no matter how long I follow you about this web site repeating them. Others have even started summarizing my questions for you as they would like to hear some answers, it has gotten to that level of absurdity. Its one thing to be a coward face-to-face its a whole other level to be such a coward as to hide from questions when you are anonymous over the web.

It is also clear from the responses of numerous others that you and your cognitive abilities are...well..not thought of very highly, to say the least.

I really wanted to keep this on a higher level but it does not seem possible in dealing with you.

So let me just say that I think you are a pathetic ignorant twit. Is that putting a fine enough point on it for you or is that too ambiguous for you?

Should we put it to a vote of the respondents on these threads and see if that is a common opinion?

So would me calling you a pathetic ignorant twit be...
a) circular logic
b) a strawman
c) a red herring
d) a fact based on the evidence of your posts

hint: D...the answer is D!

Mornin' TCR.

I see you're in fine form today.

Got your strawmen ready for another big day?

Why don't you ask me about Von Daniken and spacemen again, so you can ignore my response and pretend I didn't answer?

i don't think i've seen a single thread where RL hasn't constantly accused other people of this strawman crap, and his favorite, the red herring.

USAFHokie80 wrote:

i don't think i've seen a single thread where RL hasn't constantly accused other people of this strawman crap, and his favorite, the red herring.

If you'll do a Search of the site, you'll find I use both terms very infrequently.

But when it's appropriate, I do.

Try the 'Search' function. It's very handy and will save you the embarrassment of making such a statement again.

real life wrote:

USAFHokie80 wrote:

i don't think i've seen a single thread where RL hasn't constantly accused other people of this strawman crap, and his favorite, the red herring.

If you'll do a Search of the site, you'll find I use both terms very infrequently.

But when it's appropriate, I do.

Try the 'Search' function. It's very handy and will save you the embarrassment of making such a statement again.

hardly. i've read several threads and your used one or the other several times within a very few pages.