nightrider wrote:i am only useing YOUR logic against you
No, Dean, you're not. You're also using it in support of yourself. You wrote:
Quote:unless you can tell us what life is-and no one has been able to do that
then deans achievment must stand
which is a conditional proposition. If you're really rejecting logic, then it does not follow (since you purport not to believe in "following") that Dean is correct about death if we cannot define life.
Calling it "my" logic ain't gonna help, either. You're trying to show that I'm contradicting myself, but you adamantly hold to the belief that contradictions are not a deterrent to truth. If you want to reject logic, then you're going to have to give up the belief that contradictions are problematic, in which case you have no grounds for disagreeing with me in the first place.
You've put yourself in a pretty tough spot, Dean... you want to do away with the notion of proof but you also want to prove yourself right. Fortunately, the consequences of your theory are so trivial that it won't ever matter.