i'll show those dastardly danes !
i'll be boycotting our local danish deli (owned by the larsen family) !
OOPS ! BIG MISTAKE !
that's were we get our smoked ham , danish cheese , matjes-herring , danish pickled cucumbers ... well , i won't drink tuborg beer - that'll show them ! :wink: (about two bottles a year - that'll hit their exports !)
hbg
Al Gore's movie told about the ice caps melting away. It is believed that eventually, the coastal lands will get flooded, and disappear under water. Nobody seems too concerned about that - yet.
Ironically, CI, some opportunists are saying global warming may be a good thing if it gives us access to oil in arctic seabeds.
jw wrote :
Quote:Ironically, CI, some opportunists are saying global warming may be a good thing if it gives us access to oil in arctic seabeds.
and some are predicting that the melting icecap will be flooding NYC !
not buying any NYC realestate for the time being :wink: - but may buy an innertube !
hbg
There are some major coastal cities around the world that has the potential to get flooded out. I'm sorta glad I won't be around to witness the devastation.
Germany's Angela Merkel was in Greenland this week and discussed global warming with Denmark's Prime Minister.
Did you notice that the Russians are back to cold war footing, and are now sending airplanes around the arctic region? They claim over international air space.
The Associated Press has a story on what C.I. is talking about:
Russia Renews Long Range Bomber Flights
Wandel, Russia and China are still at a Hugh disadvantage, because the US has allies and military bases all around the world. It's impossible for them to attack any one without some dramatic consequences.
Who will they attack first and last? Too late! They will be decimated.
There is no possible way for them to protect their own homeland from attack.
UNEXPECTED HELP !
but we will gladly accept it !
hbg
Quote:A former U.S. ambassador to Ottawa says it's time for his country to reconsider its traditional position on Arctic sovereignty and admit that the Northwest Passage is part of Canada.
Paul Cellucci told CTV's Question Period he recommended such a course to the U.S. State Department before he ended his term as ambassador.
The Americans have long contended that the Northwest Passage is part of international waters. But Mr. Cellucci says that should change in the age of global terrorism.
He says acknowledging that the passage is Canadian territory would make it easier for the Canadian navy to patrol the area, monitor shipping and guard against potential infiltration by terrorists seeking a route to smuggle weapons of mass destruction into North American.
Mr. Cellucci says it's in the American interest to see a beefed-up Canadian military presence in the Arctic for continental security reasons.
SOURCE :
UNEXPECTED HELP !
The Northwest Passage: a water route joining the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans through the Arctic Archipelago, to the North of Canada, and along the northern coast of Alaska.
This is a long-standing issue between the U.S. and Canada. At times Canada has even claimed that no use of the passage can be had without her prior permission - a claim that violates the right of innocent passage, a long-standing and accepted principle of international maratime law. The U.S. has used the passage, among other things for submerged transits and operations by submarines - operations that do not qualify as innovent passage. There are numerous straits in the world that are variously claimed as national waters by bordering nations that are not recognized by maratime nations - the Malacca Straits, one of the world's principal waterways, connecting the South China Sea and the Bay of Bengal is the prime example. There are many others as well, not least including the Dardanelles. Historical precedent will not fully support Canada's case, and so far the U.S. has resisted it.
The claim that if it is recognized as their territorial waters Canada's navy will then be able to "patrol" the northwest passage and thereby make it safer for all, is laughable. Canada's "Navy" is a good deal smaller than the U.S. Coast Guard, and has been suffering from neglect and underinvestment for decades. There is very little left of it.
The scramble for recognition of territorial claims to the region is, of course, all about the expected petroleum reserves there.
Isn't there an international agreement as to what consititutes international waters? The reason I'm thinking about this is based on what happened to start the war in Vietnam.
HERE'S a link from wiki that explains some of it.
canada has nothing to worry !
we have former U.S. ambassador Paul Cellucci speaking for us - he'll take care of things !
:wink:
hbg