3
   

Does "keeping both of them off balance" mean "keeping both of them unsteady"?

 
 
Reply Fri 4 Oct, 2013 07:17 am

Does "keeping both of them off balance, first of all vis a vis each other" mean "keeping both of them unbalance, and the first step is to make them fighting against each other"?

Context:

In these latter cases, again, the question is not "supporting" marginal threats to Russia and China, but merely keeping both of them off balance, first of all vis a vis each other.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Question • Score: 3 • Views: 446 • Replies: 1
No top replies

 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Fri 4 Oct, 2013 09:07 am
@oristarA,
Off balance in such a usage usually means uncertain, keep them from knowing what's going on.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Is this comma splice? Is it proper? - Question by DaveCoop
Is this sentence grammatically correct? - Question by Sydney-Strock
Is the second "playing needed? - Question by tanguatlay
should i put "that" here ? - Question by Chen Ta
Unbeknownst to me - Question by kuben123
alternative way - Question by Nousher Ahmed
Could check my grammar mistakes please? - Question by LonelyGamer
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Does "keeping both of them off balance" mean "keeping both of them unsteady"?
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.07 seconds on 04/26/2024 at 10:29:03