10
   

Shooting a bullet into water

 
 
  1  
Reply Fri 12 Jun, 2009 11:15 am
Jane Pagel wrote:

Thank you too, High Seas. I knew it made no sense. But to be safe we'll stay away from the pond when shooting. Hah!


Not just the pond - any reflective surface (glass, metal plate, etc) is more likely to cause a ricochet than a non-reflective one (like sand). And the general ballistics equations take no account of projectile composition, only of its mass, so keep in mind that lead bullets tend to ricochet more than those manufactured of most other metals or alloys.
0 Replies
 
View Profile McTag
 
  1  
Reply Fri 12 Jun, 2009 03:15 pm

Quote:
My argument is not that splinters were more lethal (although we haven't touched upon the subject of mortal wounds), but that they caused more casualties than the shot itself.


When you consider that the impact of one heavy cannonball could give rise to a great many "splinters" (flying chunks of seasoned oak) it's no wonder to me that the splinters caused more casualties than the actual shot itself.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

What is a Light Year? - Question by Dorothy Parker
inverted flight - Question by paps
SINGLE CELL FOSSIL - Discussion by hamburger
Does Space Exploration Make Sense? - Question by thegalacticemperor
Blue Brain - Discussion by edgarblythe
Sunset of Darwinism - Discussion by gungasnake
 
Copyright © 2009 Horizontal Verticals :: Page generated in 0.33 seconds on 11/22/2009 at 10:32:39 Top End