Mon 21 Jan, 2013 12:09 pm - I agree with you - there is only one subject: "clients". However, while I do a fair bit of writing, and aspire to write well, I am no expert.
I can see why one might think that there... (view)
Fri 18 Jan, 2013 02:22 pm - The phrase you quote is not even a sentence. I politely suggest that the original text you quote in your post is poorly written to the point of being incomprehensible. I am, of course, not... (view)
Thu 17 Jan, 2013 10:11 am - Sorry, I could not understand your argument. However, I am not suggesting you are not communicating well - I probably do not know enough to make sense of your answer. My point was this: I... (view)
Mon 14 Jan, 2013 02:15 pm - I agree with the other poster. However, it is my opinion that the quality of the writing (in the original text) is not good. So while "key" is indeed "the right word", the... (view)
Fri 11 Jan, 2013 02:02 pm - [quote]I personally think it is somewhat difficult to maintain a vision of free will without some sort of espousal of either a soul or dualism or some transcendent self which is not subject to... (view)
Fri 11 Jan, 2013 01:58 pm - I posted this same material in another forum. I assume its OK to copy and paste it here:
Kant argues that free will is possible, given a strong distinction between the "thing in... (view)
Fri 11 Jan, 2013 08:28 am - I am confident that your view lines up that of the "official" experts (e.g. Strunk, etc.). Follow-on question: When one uses the semi-colon as you prescribe, should the first word of... (view)
