Reply
Tue 26 Jun, 2007 05:37 am
PTSD, repression, and "whistling past the graveyard"
I suspect that PTSD (Post Traumatic Stress Disorder) might well become one of the most important concerns for America that results from this war in Iraq.
What I have read about these matters indicates that our fundamental fear of death and its subsequent repression forms the foundation for this mental breakdown called PTSD. Repression becomes completely exhausted and the consciousness of death becomes constant and finally irrepressible. The victims of PTSD can no longer ?'whistle past the graveyard'.
The evolution into self-consciousness from self-satisfying ignorance inherent in animal nature had one great tragedy for wo/mankind, which is anxiety or dread. It is our very humanness which produces anxiety--dread of death. This anxiety results from the ambiguity of our situation and our inability to overcome such an ambiguity. This ubiquity of ambiguity drives us into the creation of a virtual world in which to live. Self-consciousness cannot be denied, we cannot disappear into a state of vegetation, we cannot flee dread; we can only create delusions--a virtual reality.
The task of the sciences of psychology, psychoanalysis, sociology, and anthropology are to discover the strategies that humans use to avoid anxiety. How do we function automatically and uncritically in our virtual world and how do these strategies deprive us of true growth and freedom of action?
Today we talk about ?'repression' and ?'denial'; Kierkegaard, the pioneer, called these same things "shut-upness". He recognized the ?'half-obscurity' in which wo/man lives her life, he recognized that man recognizes the truth of ceremony, how many times to bow when walking past the altar, he knows things in the same way that a pupil uses ABC of a mathematical expression but not when it is changed to DEF. "He is therefore in dread whenever he hears something not arranged in the same order."
Shut-upness is what we today call repression. Kierkegaard recognized a "lofty shut-upness" and a "mistaken shut-upness". It is important that a child be reared in a lofty shut-upness, i.e. reserve, because it represents an ego-controlled and self-confident perception of the world.
Mistaken shut-upness, however, results "in too much blockage, too much anxiety, too much effort to face up to experience by an organism that has been overburdened and weakened in its own controls
more automatic repression by an essentially closed personality". Good is openness to new possibilities and evil is closed to such possibility.
Shut-upness is called, by Kierkegaard, "the lie of character". "It is easy to see that shut-upness eo ipso signifies a lie, or, if you prefer, untruth. But untruth is precisely unfreedom
the elasticity of freedom is consumed in the service of close reserve
Close reserve was the effect of the negating retrenchment of the ego in the individuality."
This ?'lie of character' is developed by the infant's need to adjust to the world. This unfreedom becomes mistaken shut-upness when the character becomes too fearful of the world to open itself up to its possibilities. Such individuals become ?'inauthentic'; they are not their own person; they follow a life style that becomes automatic and uncritical, they become locked in tradition. This infant grows up becoming the ?'automatic cultural-man'.
Quotes from "The Denial of Death"; Pulitzer Prize winner for nonfiction by Ernest Becker.
I have an awesome vocabulary, but i still dont know exactly what it means.
Is he saying that we repress our fears constantly? And in certain situations we cant repress our fears anymore?
OGIONIK wrote:I have an awesome vocabulary, but i still dont know exactly what it means.
Is he saying that we repress our fears constantly? And in certain situations we cant repress our fears anymore?
Yes, you are on the mark. Our standard mode of operation is to repress our anxieties and when that repression fails we fall into very difficult problems.
hey coberst what are some books you would recomend? you gave me some before but i didnt write them down.
OGIONIK wrote:hey coberst what are some books you would recomend? you gave me some before but i didnt write them down.
I recommend
The Death and Rebirth of Meaning--Ira Progoff
The Denial of Death--Ernest Becker
The Birth and Death of Meaning--Ernest Becker
Philosophy in the Flesh--Lakoff and Johnson
coberst wrote:OGIONIK wrote:I have an awesome vocabulary, but i still dont know exactly what it means.
Is he saying that we repress our fears constantly? And in certain situations we cant repress our fears anymore?
Yes, you are on the mark. Our standard mode of operation is to repress our anxieties and when that repression fails we fall into very difficult problems.
I don't think everyone, always, represses anxiety, nor do I get that from this portion of your text:
Quote:This ?'lie of character' is developed by the infant's need to adjust to the world. This unfreedom becomes mistaken shut-upness when the character becomes too fearful of the world to open itself up to its possibilities. Such individuals become ?'inauthentic'; they are not their own person; they follow a life style that becomes automatic and uncritical, they become locked in tradition. This infant grows up becoming the ?'automatic cultural-man'.
As I read this, the author is saying a person becomes locked into "mistaken shut-upness" underconditions of something beyond what this particular person might consider normal. Some people are able to look anxiety in the eye and say, "So what?" And many children I have observed are completely nonplussed by situations which might cause an adult anxiety (e.g., going down an icy ski-slope at top speed, petting a large snake).
The person who becomes "inauthentic," according to the above quote becomes uncritical in that he readily accepts what is told him my someone in authority, but I think such a person is apt to be extremely critical (to the point of great agitation) when confronted with opinions which differ from his own.
eclectic
I agree, it is a matter of degree. Those who find a middle ground are able to function in what we might consider to be 'normal'.