0
   

Fruit flies display rudimentary free will

 
 
Zippo
 
Reply Wed 16 May, 2007 04:36 am
Quote:
Fruit flies display rudimentary free will

01:00 16 May 2007
NewScientist.com news service
Bob Holmes


Fruit flies have free will. Even when deprived of any sensory input to react to, the zigs and zags of their flight reveal an intrinsic, non-random - yet still unpredictable - decision-making capacity.

If evolution has furnished humans with a similar capacity, this could help resolve one of the long-standing puzzles of philosophy.

Science assumes that effects have causes, and that if we understand the causes well enough we can predict the effects. But if so, our experience of being free to make choices is an illusion, since we are in effect just sophisticated robots responding to stimuli. If our behaviour is unpredictable, this is only because random events prevent us from responding perfectly to our environment.


To test whether behaviour can be truly random, Björn Brembs, a neurobiologist at the Free University of Berlin in Germany, put fruit flies into a sensory deprivation chamber: a drum with a white interior, that offers the flies no visual cues to orient themselves.

The flies were glued to a torque meter that measured their zigs and zags as they attempted to fly. (Watch a video of a fly in the chamber.)
Non-random behaviour

Brembs and colleagues analysed the resulting flight records using increasingly sophisticated models of random behaviour. Were the flies' decisions random, like the result of a coin flip? No. Did they fit a coin-flip model in which the probability of "heads" varied randomly? Again, no.

Nor could they be explained by a series of random inputs, or a series of random inputs combined in non-random ways.

Instead, the researchers found that the flies' behaviour bears the hallmark of chaos - a non-random process that is nevertheless unpredictable, like the weather. No one has yet been able to adequately explain how chaos arises.
Chaotic advantage

The chaotic control gives flies' flight a spontaneity that might be evolutionarily advantageous when searching for food, say, or when a female tries to avoid an unwanted male. And, unlike true randomness, evolution can fine-tune the level of this spontaneity, Brembs says.

It's a rudimentary sort of free will, he adds. A more sophisticated version of chaotic control could help human will break free of simple, robotic cause and effect.

"It makes a lot of sense to assume that what we experience as free will is based on components that have cropped up in evolution long before," says Brembs.

newscientist


I found this article to be fascinating (emphasis underlined). However, this subject is rather complex, and i hope a good debate amongst our more intelligent members will help to further my understanding...

"Understanding the mechanisms involved may also lead to development of free-thinking robots, bringing science fiction to life." ?
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 1,178 • Replies: 1
No top replies

 
joefromchicago
 
  1  
Reply Wed 16 May, 2007 08:24 am
Re: Fruit flies display rudimentary free will
Bob Holmes wrote:
Fruit flies have free will. Even when deprived of any sensory input to react to, the zigs and zags of their flight reveal an intrinsic, non-random - yet still unpredictable - decision-making capacity.

"Non-random yet still unpredictable" behavior is no more evidence of free will than random yet predictable behavior. If a fruit fly in a "sensory deprivation chamber" (a somewhat doubtful proposition in itself, since we can't be certain if the fly is genuinely deprived of its sense inputs) exhibits non-random yet unpredictable behavior, there is no reason to conclude that this behavior is non-determined. After all, the behavior it exhibits in that environment might be determined by some non-sensory factor, such as instinct, which this experiment did not take into account. Indeed, assuming that all determined behavior is determined by sensory inputs is a form of question-begging, so the experiment rests on an inherent logical flaw.

Bob Holmes wrote:
Instead, the researchers found that the flies' behaviour bears the hallmark of chaos - a non-random process that is nevertheless unpredictable, like the weather. No one has yet been able to adequately explain how chaos arises.

This statement highlights the flaw in the experimenters' logic. If the fly's behavior can be described as "chaotic," and no one can explain how chaotic behavior arises, then the experimenters cannot assume that chaotic behavior is non-determined behavior. In other words, the experimenters cannot assume that free will is the only thing that can explain the fly's behavior.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

How can we be sure? - Discussion by Raishu-tensho
Proof of nonexistence of free will - Discussion by litewave
Destroy My Belief System, Please! - Discussion by Thomas
Star Wars in Philosophy. - Discussion by Logicus
Existence of Everything. - Discussion by Logicus
Is it better to be feared or loved? - Discussion by Black King
Paradigm shifts - Question by Cyracuz
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Fruit flies display rudimentary free will
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.08 seconds on 11/14/2024 at 11:22:56