Re: Fruit flies display rudimentary free will
Bob Holmes wrote:Fruit flies have free will. Even when deprived of any sensory input to react to, the zigs and zags of their flight reveal an intrinsic, non-random - yet still unpredictable - decision-making capacity.
"Non-random yet still unpredictable" behavior is no more evidence of free will than random yet predictable behavior. If a fruit fly in a "sensory deprivation chamber" (a somewhat doubtful proposition in itself, since we can't be certain if the fly is genuinely deprived of its sense inputs) exhibits non-random yet unpredictable behavior, there is no reason to conclude that this behavior is
non-determined. After all, the behavior it exhibits in that environment might be determined by some non-sensory factor, such as instinct, which this experiment did not take into account. Indeed, assuming that
all determined behavior is determined by sensory inputs is a form of question-begging, so the experiment rests on an inherent logical flaw.
Bob Holmes wrote:Instead, the researchers found that the flies' behaviour bears the hallmark of chaos - a non-random process that is nevertheless unpredictable, like the weather. No one has yet been able to adequately explain how chaos arises.
This statement highlights the flaw in the experimenters' logic. If the fly's behavior can be described as "chaotic," and no one can explain how chaotic behavior arises, then the experimenters cannot assume that chaotic behavior is
non-determined behavior. In other words, the experimenters cannot assume that free will is the only thing that can explain the fly's behavior.