2
   

An Amputee Sprinter: Is He Disabled or Too-Abled?

 
 
Reply Tue 15 May, 2007 08:59 am
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 2 • Views: 3,058 • Replies: 6
No top replies

 
flushd
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 May, 2007 08:02 am
Interesting! Love it. I'm going to be watching when he busts through this obstacle -- and he will, or the next guy will, or the next guy. That's what it's all about.

Can't wait to see what the next 10 years has in store for sports.

It's so exciting.

My mind is not fixed on any one view in this area yet. I just want to see what happens! Smile

I remember seeing Cheetahs in the Paraolympics (love love love the Paraolympics!) and they are cool cool cool. Couldn't wipe the grin from my face for a solid week. Couldn't shut up about it.

I do think, that regardless of all the resistance - the times they are a'changing. Eventually, enhancements of this sort will be thoroughly accepted and not even blinked at. We will be on to other things.

Low play when someone uses the old "retaining the purity of sport" card.

He IS a quality athlete.

A lot depends on what you think makes an athlete. And what is sport.
0 Replies
 
Noddy24
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 May, 2007 12:29 pm
I'm reminded of the French cyclists insisting that chemotherapy drugs were performance enhancers.
0 Replies
 
mushypancakes
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Jan, 2008 09:05 am
Bumping this to update:

An athlete has been banned from the Olympics bc of his Cheetahs.

Made me think of this article from long ago.

Wild. Will try to find the 'new' article .
0 Replies
 
eoe
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Jan, 2008 09:09 am
I read that article a few days ago and it appeared to me, from the diagrams, that this athlete does have an advantage because of the spring and bounce he gets out of the blocks from his Cheetahs.

The irony of it is ridiculous.
0 Replies
 
mushypancakes
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Jan, 2008 09:12 am
Yeah, it is pretty funny.

Except for that athlete! Ooo that would suck.
0 Replies
 
Ragman
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Jan, 2008 10:04 am
I applaud and love seeing what's now technologically possible for an anatomically challenged athlete who can be assisted in this way. My joy abounds for humanity over this accomplishment of science-and-human-athletics; however, this doesn't cloud my awareness that they ironically now could have a theoretical advantage as these mechanically-assisted limbs do not fatigue as do human muscle, tendons and bone. Not to mention the added spring and bounce of the J-shaped 'blades' offer over the lower human leg.

Not sure how I would advise the Olympic committee to accept this. They have their respective hands full keeping up with doping, steroids and other enhancement issues. What can the proper solution be? I want these athletes in the competition somehow but the question is how can it be done fairly? These Olympic committees are notoriously uneven in their keeping up with medical science and often are late or negligent as to how to properly and judiciously resolve such issues.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Should cheerleading be a sport? - Discussion by joefromchicago
Are You Ready For Fantasy Baseball - 2009? - Discussion by realjohnboy
tennis grip - Question by madalina
How much faster could Usain Bolt have gone? - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Sochi Olympics a Resounding Success - Discussion by gungasnake
 
  1. Forums
  2. » An Amputee Sprinter: Is He Disabled or Too-Abled?
Copyright © 2021 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 04/14/2021 at 08:59:46