1
   

Logical Positivism

 
 
coberst
 
Reply Wed 9 May, 2007 05:29 am
Questions for discussion:

Did you realize that we cannot prove the truth of any factual claim?

What are useful tautologies of math and logic?
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 404 • Replies: 1
No top replies

 
Steve 41oo
 
  1  
Reply Wed 9 May, 2007 07:20 am
I looked up logical positivism at the university of Walamalloo, Aus. and this is what I found

Quote:
Immanuel Kant was a real piss-ant who was very rarely stable.

Heideggar, Heideggar was a boozy beggar who could think you under the table.

David Hume could out-consume Schopenhauer and Hegel.

And Whittgenstein was a beery swine who was just as sloshed as Schlegel.

There's nothing Nieizsche couldn't teach 'ya 'bout the raising of the wrist.

Socrates, himself, was permanently pissed.

John Stewart Mill, of his own free will, after half a pint of shanty was particularly ill.

Plato, they say, could stick it away, 'alf a crate of whiskey every day!

Aristotle, Aristotle was a bugger for the bottle, And Hobbes was fond of his Dram.

And Rene Descartes was a drunken fart: "I drink, therefore I am."

Yes, Socrates himself is particularly missed;

A lovely little thinker, but a bugger when he's pissed.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

How can we be sure? - Discussion by Raishu-tensho
Proof of nonexistence of free will - Discussion by litewave
Destroy My Belief System, Please! - Discussion by Thomas
Star Wars in Philosophy. - Discussion by Logicus
Existence of Everything. - Discussion by Logicus
Is it better to be feared or loved? - Discussion by Black King
Paradigm shifts - Question by Cyracuz
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Logical Positivism
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.07 seconds on 09/18/2024 at 07:49:13