Setanta wrote:DrewDad wrote:Quote:Chai wrote:DrewDad wrote:Chai wrote:Chai wrote:DrewDad wrote:Setanta wrote:DrewDad wrote:Chai wrote:Setanta wrote:DrewDad wrote:Setanta wrote:Phoenix32890 wrote:Setanta wrote:Bi-Polar Bear wrote:kickycan wrote:Setanta wrote:Chai wrote:Setanta wrote:Chai wrote:DrewDad wrote:DrewDad wrote:DrewDad wrote:snookered wrote:au1929 wrote:snookered wrote:au1929 wrote:snookered wrote:au1929 wrote:Some people are very slow learners
and?
And what??
So you know how to cut and paste. No comment on the article?
My comment was at the head of the page.
Some people are very slow learners
I should have made that clear.. And now What ?
Your right, the way you cut it, made that statement look like the title, just above the by line.
Still don't know if it was your statementand doubt it was. And now what? So make sure that you remember that when one communicates via internet, one has to be very clear. That is What Now!
I figure we can use yet another level of encapsulation.
and another...
and
another!
Let's see how far we can take this bad boy...
OK, i'm game . . . will this reach a point at which the text is unreadable?
I dunno, let's see..
Just what is that supposed to mean, Miss Coke or Pepsi ? ! ? ! ? Don't get smart-mouthed with me . . .
Let's go for the record!!!
anything worth doing is worth doing well
Just what the hell is that supposed to mean ? ! ? ! ? This place is crawling with smart-mouths . . .
Could you repeat that, please? I think that I missed something!!
I said, i want to see what happens when the original post gets squeezed into a really narrow space . . .
Between snookered's ears
is a really narrow space.
Dense, too, it appears . . .
I'm getting this thread mixed up with the snout thread.
No need to get teste.
What does anybody's scrotum have to do with it?
It's the thread title. Sheesh.
This thread is called scrotum?
What do you mean reached the quoting limit?
Whaddaya call this?
Looks like a max of 22 nested quotes.
so what's happening to the other posts?
Let's find out. I manually added "quote" tags around your post....
I don't think that was necessary. It just appeared that some limit had been reached, because a few people were quoting different posts. This post may tell us.
Good point. I assumed the quote button was automatically truncating, but it appears that the posts retain the original information. The dynamic web page is what must be providing the limit.