Chai wrote:DrewDad wrote:DrewDad wrote:DrewDad wrote:snookered wrote:au1929 wrote:snookered wrote:au1929 wrote:snookered wrote:au1929 wrote:Some people are very slow learners
and?
And what??
So you know how to cut and paste. No comment on the article?
My comment was at the head of the page.
Some people are very slow learners
I should have made that clear.. And now What ?
Your right, the way you cut it, made that statement look like the title, just above the by line.
Still don't know if it was your statementand doubt it was. And now what? So make sure that you remember that when one communicates via internet, one has to be very clear. That is What Now!
I figure we can use yet another level of encapsulation.
and another...
and
another!
Let's see how far we can take this bad boy...
OK, i'm game . . . will this reach a point at which the text is unreadable?
Chai wrote:Setanta wrote:Chai wrote:DrewDad wrote:DrewDad wrote:DrewDad wrote:snookered wrote:au1929 wrote:snookered wrote:au1929 wrote:snookered wrote:au1929 wrote:Some people are very slow learners
and?
And what??
So you know how to cut and paste. No comment on the article?
My comment was at the head of the page.
Some people are very slow learners
I should have made that clear.. And now What ?
Your right, the way you cut it, made that statement look like the title, just above the by line.
Still don't know if it was your statementand doubt it was. And now what? So make sure that you remember that when one communicates via internet, one has to be very clear. That is What Now!
I figure we can use yet another level of encapsulation.
and another...
and
another!
Let's see how far we can take this bad boy...
OK, i'm game . . . will this reach a point at which the text is unreadable?
I dunno, let's see..
Just what is that supposed to mean, Miss Coke or Pepsi ? ! ? ! ? Don't get smart-mouthed with me . . .
I'll agree with that, JL, assuming that market forces do the job. My sticking point on censorship, which some folks seem to want, is the fine hairs, if there are any, between racist speech, usually made by a racist, but possibly not (and when not? I dunno, I 'm thinking about it, and even if it is, at what point does it qualify as hate speech), and hate speech, which I trust is a no even on cable tv, and how these relate to free speech in general, a precious currency under stress from many quarters.
Setanta wrote:Chai wrote:Setanta wrote:Chai wrote:DrewDad wrote:DrewDad wrote:DrewDad wrote:snookered wrote:au1929 wrote:snookered wrote:au1929 wrote:snookered wrote:au1929 wrote:Some people are very slow learners
and?
And what??
So you know how to cut and paste. No comment on the article?
My comment was at the head of the page.
Some people are very slow learners
I should have made that clear.. And now What ?
Your right, the way you cut it, made that statement look like the title, just above the by line.
Still don't know if it was your statementand doubt it was. And now what? So make sure that you remember that when one communicates via internet, one has to be very clear. That is What Now!
I figure we can use yet another level of encapsulation.
and another...
and
another!
Let's see how far we can take this bad boy...
OK, i'm game . . . will this reach a point at which the text is unreadable?
I dunno, let's see..
Just what is that supposed to mean, Miss Coke or Pepsi ? ! ? ! ? Don't get smart-mouthed with me . . .
Let's go for the record!!!
kickycan wrote:Setanta wrote:Chai wrote:Setanta wrote:Chai wrote:DrewDad wrote:DrewDad wrote:DrewDad wrote:snookered wrote:au1929 wrote:snookered wrote:au1929 wrote:snookered wrote:au1929 wrote:Some people are very slow learners
and?
And what??
So you know how to cut and paste. No comment on the article?
My comment was at the head of the page.
Some people are very slow learners
I should have made that clear.. And now What ?
Your right, the way you cut it, made that statement look like the title, just above the by line.
Still don't know if it was your statementand doubt it was. And now what? So make sure that you remember that when one communicates via internet, one has to be very clear. That is What Now!
I figure we can use yet another level of encapsulation.
and another...
and
another!
Let's see how far we can take this bad boy...
OK, i'm game . . . will this reach a point at which the text is unreadable?
I dunno, let's see..
Just what is that supposed to mean, Miss Coke or Pepsi ? ! ? ! ? Don't get smart-mouthed with me . . .
Let's go for the record!!!
anything worth doing is worth doing well
Bi-Polar Bear wrote:kickycan wrote:Setanta wrote:Chai wrote:Setanta wrote:Chai wrote:DrewDad wrote:DrewDad wrote:DrewDad wrote:snookered wrote:au1929 wrote:snookered wrote:au1929 wrote:snookered wrote:au1929 wrote:Some people are very slow learners
and?
And what??
So you know how to cut and paste. No comment on the article?
My comment was at the head of the page.
Some people are very slow learners
I should have made that clear.. And now What ?
Your right, the way you cut it, made that statement look like the title, just above the by line.
Still don't know if it was your statementand doubt it was. And now what? So make sure that you remember that when one communicates via internet, one has to be very clear. That is What Now!
I figure we can use yet another level of encapsulation.
and another...
and
another!
Let's see how far we can take this bad boy...
OK, i'm game . . . will this reach a point at which the text is unreadable?
I dunno, let's see..
Just what is that supposed to mean, Miss Coke or Pepsi ? ! ? ! ? Don't get smart-mouthed with me . . .
Let's go for the record!!!
anything worth doing is worth doing well
Just what the hell is that supposed to mean ? ! ? ! ? This place is crawling with smart-mouths . . .
Phoenix32890 wrote:Setanta wrote:Bi-Polar Bear wrote:kickycan wrote:Setanta wrote:Chai wrote:Setanta wrote:Chai wrote:DrewDad wrote:DrewDad wrote:DrewDad wrote:snookered wrote:au1929 wrote:snookered wrote:au1929 wrote:snookered wrote:au1929 wrote:Some people are very slow learners
and?
And what??
So you know how to cut and paste. No comment on the article?
My comment was at the head of the page.
Some people are very slow learners
I should have made that clear.. And now What ?
Your right, the way you cut it, made that statement look like the title, just above the by line.
Still don't know if it was your statementand doubt it was. And now what? So make sure that you remember that when one communicates via internet, one has to be very clear. That is What Now!
I figure we can use yet another level of encapsulation.
and another...
and
another!
Let's see how far we can take this bad boy...
OK, i'm game . . . will this reach a point at which the text is unreadable?
I dunno, let's see..
Just what is that supposed to mean, Miss Coke or Pepsi ? ! ? ! ? Don't get smart-mouthed with me . . .
Let's go for the record!!!
anything worth doing is worth doing well
Just what the hell is that supposed to mean ? ! ? ! ? This place is crawling with smart-mouths . . .
Could you repeat that, please? I think that I missed something!! 
I said, i want to see what happens when the original post gets squeezed into a really narrow space . . .
Set, I couldn't bring myself to read that, but I admit that it is artistic.
DrewDad wrote:Setanta wrote:Phoenix32890 wrote:Setanta wrote:Bi-Polar Bear wrote:kickycan wrote:Setanta wrote:Chai wrote:Setanta wrote:Chai wrote:DrewDad wrote:DrewDad wrote:DrewDad wrote:snookered wrote:au1929 wrote:snookered wrote:au1929 wrote:snookered wrote:au1929 wrote:Some people are very slow learners
and?
And what??
So you know how to cut and paste. No comment on the article?
My comment was at the head of the page.
Some people are very slow learners
I should have made that clear.. And now What ?
Your right, the way you cut it, made that statement look like the title, just above the by line.
Still don't know if it was your statementand doubt it was. And now what? So make sure that you remember that when one communicates via internet, one has to be very clear. That is What Now!
I figure we can use yet another level of encapsulation.
and another...
and
another!
Let's see how far we can take this bad boy...
OK, i'm game . . . will this reach a point at which the text is unreadable?
I dunno, let's see..
Just what is that supposed to mean, Miss Coke or Pepsi ? ! ? ! ? Don't get smart-mouthed with me . . .
Let's go for the record!!!
anything worth doing is worth doing well
Just what the hell is that supposed to mean ? ! ? ! ? This place is crawling with smart-mouths . . .
Could you repeat that, please? I think that I missed something!!
I said, i want to see what happens when the original post gets squeezed into a really narrow space . . .
Between snookered's ears
is a really narrow space.
Dense, too, it appears . . .
Setanta wrote:DrewDad wrote:Setanta wrote:Phoenix32890 wrote:Setanta wrote:Bi-Polar Bear wrote:kickycan wrote:Setanta wrote:Chai wrote:Setanta wrote:Chai wrote:DrewDad wrote:DrewDad wrote:DrewDad wrote:snookered wrote:au1929 wrote:snookered wrote:au1929 wrote:snookered wrote:au1929 wrote:Some people are very slow learners
and?
And what??
So you know how to cut and paste. No comment on the article?
My comment was at the head of the page.
Some people are very slow learners
I should have made that clear.. And now What ?
Your right, the way you cut it, made that statement look like the title, just above the by line.
Still don't know if it was your statementand doubt it was. And now what? So make sure that you remember that when one communicates via internet, one has to be very clear. That is What Now!
I figure we can use yet another level of encapsulation.
and another...
and
another!
Let's see how far we can take this bad boy...
OK, i'm game . . . will this reach a point at which the text is unreadable?
I dunno, let's see..
Just what is that supposed to mean, Miss Coke or Pepsi ? ! ? ! ? Don't get smart-mouthed with me . . .
Let's go for the record!!!
anything worth doing is worth doing well
Just what the hell is that supposed to mean ? ! ? ! ? This place is crawling with smart-mouths . . .
Could you repeat that, please? I think that I missed something!!
I said, i want to see what happens when the original post gets squeezed into a really narrow space . . .
Between snookered's ears
is a really narrow space.
Dense, too, it appears . . .
I'm getting this thread mixed up with the snout thread.
To continue my talk with myself, I think rap and hip hop have a self celebration aspect that I can understand. I don't listen to it since I don't like misogyny when I hear it and I don't like the sounds particularly, but I don't really want to blast a whole aspect of music, much less shut it down. And I see Set's point, or what I took to be his point, somewhere back there on one of these threads, that there is a historic background difference between race stuff coming from 'whites' and 'blacks'.
I would not like for comedy clubs/performances to be stultified. I wouldn't have missed Richard Pryor, for example, for the world. Then there's Lenny Bruce. People have struggled to be free to talk.
So back to Imus, having only listened to him once or twice while driving to Pomona years ago, I didn't know until this thread about the cultural/racial dumps he's done before, given links or clips by BBB and Snood.
As.sinine in the totality. The market will play out on him one way or another.
But, y'know, on a2k we deal with some very biased folk, and the general consensus seems to be a matter of dealing with the stupidities, by arguing or mocking, before any kind of censorship.
I would have liked the Rutgers' team to have been a tad more like Squinney suggested, taking Imus on in the interview more. I'm trying to imagine my niece "having her life ruined by his comment". She would have had an articulate riposte and made him look even more stupid.
I didn't see the event though, so that is second hand info.
DrewDad wrote:Chai wrote:Setanta wrote:DrewDad wrote:Setanta wrote:Phoenix32890 wrote:Setanta wrote:Bi-Polar Bear wrote:kickycan wrote:Setanta wrote:Chai wrote:Setanta wrote:Chai wrote:DrewDad wrote:DrewDad wrote:DrewDad wrote:snookered wrote:au1929 wrote:snookered wrote:au1929 wrote:snookered wrote:au1929 wrote:Some people are very slow learners
and?
And what??
So you know how to cut and paste. No comment on the article?
My comment was at the head of the page.
Some people are very slow learners
I should have made that clear.. And now What ?
Your right, the way you cut it, made that statement look like the title, just above the by line.
Still don't know if it was your statementand doubt it was. And now what? So make sure that you remember that when one communicates via internet, one has to be very clear. That is What Now!
I figure we can use yet another level of encapsulation.
and another...
and
another!
Let's see how far we can take this bad boy...
OK, i'm game . . . will this reach a point at which the text is unreadable?
I dunno, let's see..
Just what is that supposed to mean, Miss Coke or Pepsi ? ! ? ! ? Don't get smart-mouthed with me . . .
Let's go for the record!!!
anything worth doing is worth doing well
Just what the hell is that supposed to mean ? ! ? ! ? This place is crawling with smart-mouths . . .
Could you repeat that, please? I think that I missed something!!
I said, i want to see what happens when the original post gets squeezed into a really narrow space . . .
Between snookered's ears
is a really narrow space.
Dense, too, it appears . . .
I'm getting this thread mixed up with the snout thread.
No need to get teste.
What does anybody's scrotum have to do with it?
Setanta wrote:DrewDad wrote:Chai wrote:Setanta wrote:DrewDad wrote:Setanta wrote:Phoenix32890 wrote:Setanta wrote:Bi-Polar Bear wrote:kickycan wrote:Setanta wrote:Chai wrote:Setanta wrote:Chai wrote:DrewDad wrote:DrewDad wrote:DrewDad wrote:snookered wrote:au1929 wrote:snookered wrote:au1929 wrote:snookered wrote:au1929 wrote:Some people are very slow learners
and?
And what??
So you know how to cut and paste. No comment on the article?
My comment was at the head of the page.
Some people are very slow learners
I should have made that clear.. And now What ?
Your right, the way you cut it, made that statement look like the title, just above the by line.
Still don't know if it was your statementand doubt it was. And now what? So make sure that you remember that when one communicates via internet, one has to be very clear. That is What Now!
I figure we can use yet another level of encapsulation.
and another...
and
another!
Let's see how far we can take this bad boy...
OK, i'm game . . . will this reach a point at which the text is unreadable?
I dunno, let's see..
Just what is that supposed to mean, Miss Coke or Pepsi ? ! ? ! ? Don't get smart-mouthed with me . . .
Let's go for the record!!!
anything worth doing is worth doing well
Just what the hell is that supposed to mean ? ! ? ! ? This place is crawling with smart-mouths . . .
Could you repeat that, please? I think that I missed something!!
I said, i want to see what happens when the original post gets squeezed into a really narrow space . . .
Between snookered's ears
is a really narrow space.
Dense, too, it appears . . .
I'm getting this thread mixed up with the snout thread.
No need to get teste.
What does anybody's scrotum have to do with it?
It's the thread title. Sheesh.
