spendius wrote:smorgsie wrote-
Quote:Recent reports show that women are still not receiving equal pay in U.K.
You do have to remember that stopping the country going into bankruptcy has higher priority. We all know that ladies can ask clients their name and address and write it down in a box as good as most men but when one sees film of people repairing powerlines during blizzards, or installing new sewers and utility supplies, or coming out of a mine shaft cage door or cutting down trees with chain saws or many a lot of other similarly challenging activities it is very noticeable that ladies are conspicuous by their absence. And rightly so. Broken fingernails, calloused hands and many more serious injuries should not be inflicted upon such delicate organisms as ladies are.
Why they wish to work at all passes my comprehension. After all, a goldmine is reputed to have the capacity to set one up for life and has indeed done on many occasions.
One assumes that were ladies ever to receive equal pay it would be the ultimate victory of the Paperwork Party and the economy would be solely concerned with everyone asking everyone else their name and address and writing it down in a box specifically marked for the purpose so it was more or less impossible to make a mistake.
One might rephrase your statement as-
Men are still not allowed equal access to soft jobs.
But beware investors. They are working on it and when men work on something they usually pull it off.
SPENDY, YOU LITTLE EFFER!!!
NOW POST THE WORDS AROUND THAT MESSAGE - THAT I
DELETED!
YOU SNEAKY BUGGER, EDITING IT TO SUIT YOUR REPLY (USUAL BORING PRE-PREPARED CLAP TRAP ON FEMINISM).
I WAS QUITE HAPPY, SITTING HERE, GETTING PISSED, LISTENING TO THE GREAT ARTHUR LOVE...
NOW YOU'VE GONE AND SPOILT MY MOOD WITH YOUR NAUGHTY WAYS!
COME HERE RIGHT NOW AND APOLOGISE! OR I'LL SHALL HAVE TO TAKE YOU IN HAND - AND BEWARE, I'VE JUST BOUGHT A SEQUINNNED HANDLED RIDING CROP!
I'VE ALWAYS SAID (HAVN'T I?) THAT I WAS AWARE THAT EQUAL PAY WAS NOT ALWAYS AS STRAIGHTFORWARD AS CERTAIN INTERESTED PARTIES WOULD HAVE US THINK, I'M MORE THAN WILLING TO DEBATE THIS, BUT WHAT YOU DID WAS SNEAKY IN EXTREEMIS AND YOU SHOULD DO THE RIGHT THING AND APOLOGISE.
NOW! <-- That's me shouting, rare, but shrill and very boomy.
x