55
   

THE BRITISH THREAD II

 
 
McTag
 
  1  
Reply Fri 6 Jul, 2007 02:46 pm
lmur wrote:
For the Mancs:

Mr Eriksson's first task at City will be to strengthen his strike-force. It appears that the mis-firing duo from last season are on the way out.

Hence the headline: Sven Chops Dickov.


Sven was reported as going to the training ground for the first time on Wednesday to see his players train.

On Thursday, he told his chairman he needed 10 new players- a new team.

Rolling Eyes Confused :wink: Laughing
0 Replies
 
Steve 41oo
 
  1  
Reply Fri 6 Jul, 2007 02:54 pm
spendius wrote:
Steve wrote-

Quote:
yeah well its not all smokers that irritate me, just those bleaters like Spendy



It isn't my fault Steve if you haven't taken the trouble or have the capacity to understand the import of this type of legislation. It is another attack on freedom, by the city-based paperwork party, based on smoke and mirrors. And the passive effects of that sort of smoke I consider deadly to our nation's future.

If you want to lie down before the steamroller which is coming your way from these puritanical forces, and puritanism is a city religion, which have been deployed in this case, where tax money has been used to tell us lies, and in other cases, that is your affair.

If they are not stopped you will soon need authorisation, from a member of the PPP of course, to leave your residence.

This ban does not affect me in the slightest. I don't smoke in public places. Their bloody superior frowns were quite sufficient for me.

I wasn't being subjective. I leave that sort of shite to folk like you.



They are control freaks and they will go from strength to strength if they only have the likes of you to deal with.

When an intellectual argument is categorised as "bleating" it is merely a dressing up of white-flag waving for self reassurance.
well I've not read your post here spends but have to say sorry...getting quite a habit...your ok fags an all
0 Replies
 
McTag
 
  1  
Reply Fri 6 Jul, 2007 03:19 pm
Spendy, you're getting all in a froth about very little.

Smoking in company, when some people object, is anti-social. Thank goodness for common sense, and it is a pity that common courtesy needs the force of the law behind it in this case.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Fri 6 Jul, 2007 05:07 pm
Bollocks.

Do you mean that if somebody objects it's anti-social.

I object to the solipsistic drivel you post on this thread so on your own argument you should f**k off sharpish.

And I object to that f****ng silly hat you wear to hide your Hintlerand your chopping down those trees and your flying fetishes.

In fact I object to Hintlers generally and think you should have compulsory hair restorer treatment.

I also object to your truncated vocabulary and your all-round stupidity and disgusting eating habits.

And more than all that lot I object to you meeting up with smorgsie and not doing her the slightest bit of good.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Fri 6 Jul, 2007 05:47 pm
How's this for humiliation?

You look in the tax and national insurance deductions on your payslip, your tax % on your chicken masala and beer etc (40% I gather) and you think that some of that has gone to pay grown men on £40,000 a year, in uniforms of ever increasing splendour, who have found a way of avoiding dangerous or difficult ways of making a living, for detecting, apprehending and giving a good talking to, to a decent sort of cove, with ordinary everyday weaknesses, who had foolishly and inconsiderately been smoking out of a train window.

Mobile phone calls, rushing to the scene, having detectives waiting on the platform, bollockings, filling in forms, polluting the streets on the way with noxious fumes of unknown felicities, feeling virtuous, self righteous and possibly, for the totally insane, actually indignant.

How humiliating would you like it to get?

And it is all down to the invention of TV.

You really are not so naive and nappious as not to be aware of what these control freaks could do with TV once they got control of it are you?

They can make you think anything they want.

They have soap operas supposedly depicting ordinary life where nobody ever uses a four-letter word despite some pretty attenuated happenings.

Next there will be no smokers. There hasn't been any masturbators for ages and ages. That's why all the characters who take any interest in females, including females, end up in the ****. Take Ken Barlow as an example.

They can persuade that life is just a bowl of cherries without breaking sweat.

I have never in my long and happy history of pubbing seen a pub on a Friday night with 8 people in it and 200 bulbs burning and the 4 bar staff, in all black uniforms, buttoned up, shifting bottles about to try to look busy, in the last hour of boozing time.

I thought the 2 on Monday and the 3 on Tuesday and the 6 on Karaoke night and the 8 on Quiz night might have been due to a perception of what the Bank of England might do to interest rates. But Friday night with 8 is not only unheard of but unthinkable.

It spells the end of civilised life to me and if it doesn't to you I think you are whistling in the dark to keep your spirits up.

Like Bob said -"Something's outa whack".

And Mr Portillo said in last Sunday's ST that our new PM has appointed a cabinet of pygmies which is code for saying we are half-way, at least, to BIG BROTHER. A one man show.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Fri 6 Jul, 2007 07:29 pm
meanwhile - if you hadnt heard it yet - in america some people have gotten from the aborted bomb attacks last weekend that, well.. "socialised medicine" is to blame for terrorism.

http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1049/735726259_82fbde6d6e.jpg
0 Replies
 
McTag
 
  1  
Reply Fri 6 Jul, 2007 11:45 pm
Don't that beat all. You can't parody Fox News.
0 Replies
 
McTag
 
  1  
Reply Sat 7 Jul, 2007 12:00 am
spendius wrote:
Bollocks.

Do you mean that if somebody objects it's anti-social.

I object to the solipsistic drivel you post on this thread so on your own argument you should f**k off sharpish.

And I object to that f****ng silly hat you wear to hide your Hintlerand your chopping down those trees and your flying fetishes.

In fact I object to Hintlers generally and think you should have compulsory hair restorer treatment.

I also object to your truncated vocabulary and your all-round stupidity and disgusting eating habits.

And more than all that lot I object to you meeting up with smorgsie and not doing her the slightest bit of good.


I think a high forehead is a sign of distinction, and of course maturity of which you evidently are still some way short.

I don't know why you should attack me in this way when all I have done is point out what a silly *wat you are.

Yes, if some people strongly object, to carry on with an offensive course of action is anti-social. You, with your large vocabulary, should understand the meaning of the word.
0 Replies
 
the prince
 
  1  
Reply Sat 7 Jul, 2007 02:10 am
I see that spendy is still going strong Very Happy
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Sat 7 Jul, 2007 04:27 am
Mac wrote-

Quote:
Yes, if some people strongly object, to carry on with an offensive course of action is anti-social. You, with your large vocabulary, should understand the meaning of the word.


You didn't need to have gone to the trouble of typing "offensive" in that sentence as it flags up long-windedness.

If everything was banned that "some people" strongly object to due to them finding it offensive or displeasing or beastly or revolting or even just unattractive then I do believe that the whole harmonious,methodically organised discipline of custom and institutionalised clockwork would cease to tick.

Take the extra runways for example that are required when the cost of air travel is brought within the budgets of the lower orders.
0 Replies
 
Mathos
 
  1  
Reply Sat 7 Jul, 2007 02:05 pm
It's obviously getting to you Spendi, this ban on smoking brought in by the Labour Government!

I'm all for it now, I've stopped, everything tastes better, smells better even. I recently sent my jackets and suits to the dry cleaners just to remove the last vestiges of the stinking rotten virginian **** from them.

I can go for a pint if I want and not be tempted by dirty filthy stinking fag smoking bastards lighting up all over the place like they have the god given right to pollute the air that I personally breath into my lungs!

Who the **** wants some decrepid creep standing next to him anywhere, coughing, spluttering, wheezing, spitting and farting woodbine fumes all over the place?

I think Mr Brown should stop alcohol being sold in public houses next and turn them all into coffee shops and tea rooms with scones and nice cream cakes.

Following that, I'll invest in a shoot 'em dead on the spot movement for any creep lighting up anywhere, even his own carzy!

You will be first on my hit list! Bradford here I come. Twisted Evil
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Sat 7 Jul, 2007 03:36 pm
Everybody has a version of that when they have recently stopped smoking my dear.

It is basically a desperate attempt to reassure themselves that they have made a wise decision.

Which they have of course because giving up on what Mr Barrie referred to as My Lady Nicotine takes the oil out of the cogs and gears of the grey matter and makes it easier for us smokers to run rings round them.

It could be said that you are giving yourself a good talking to. A sort of confession that you have been a complete anti-social idiot all the years you have smoked and are deeply ashamed of yourself.

You don't make it clear what it is you would be tempted to do on coming up against dirty filthy stinking fag smoking bastards lighting up all over the place like they have the god given right to pollute the air that you personally breath into your lungs! I suppose you are thinking of smacking them one if they are not so big.

That's a sign that your brain is already grinding to a halt as is your opening up the possibility that you might be able to breathe air into your lungs impersonally. In fact the whole post signifies that the tyres are screeching.

I would take it easy if I was you. It only takes about 9 months for the craving to go away.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Sat 7 Jul, 2007 05:33 pm
I ain't ever seen a Sat night in a pub like that before. And I have a lot of experience.
0 Replies
 
McTag
 
  1  
Reply Sun 8 Jul, 2007 01:58 am
spendius wrote:
And more than all that lot I object to you meeting up with smorgsie and not doing her the slightest bit of good.


A gentleman does not mention a lady's name in the officers' mess, or in his club, you blaggard.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Sun 8 Jul, 2007 02:08 am
Have a nice Sunday all: lots of sports .... and SUN!!!
0 Replies
 
Steve 41oo
 
  1  
Reply Sun 8 Jul, 2007 03:03 am
I went down to Hyde Park to see the prologue stage of the TdF.

Me and about 3,000,000 others so it seemed.

Saw La Vache qui Rit float.
0 Replies
 
Francis
 
  1  
Reply Sun 8 Jul, 2007 03:04 am
Nice show, wasn't it?
0 Replies
 
Steve 41oo
 
  1  
Reply Sun 8 Jul, 2007 03:08 am
yes great...but TOO many people

watched most of the racing from the Bar Ricard on the large screen.

Whole event was well organised and ideal for 1/10th number of PEOPLE. Where do they all come from?
0 Replies
 
McTag
 
  1  
Reply Sun 8 Jul, 2007 06:54 am
Men on bikes...and Lycra....men in tights...whoosh! and they're gone, till next year. What's that all about? Spectator sport? Do me a favour. Jacques Anquetil, I've heard of him. How do they pedal up these big hills so fast? Wouldn't it be easier on a moped?
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Sun 8 Jul, 2007 07:14 am
Mac wrote-

Quote:
A gentleman does not mention a lady's name in the officers' mess, or in his club, you blaggard.


I am not a gentleman, nor an officer, and if smorgie's posts and confessions are to be accepted at face value she is no lady except in the strict biological sense that word sometimes carries when used ironically.

Any familiarity with gentlemanliness and officer's messes which you are cosying up to is belied by your own posts. If you were an officer I should imagine the men would desert their posts forthwith.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

FOLLOWING THE EUROPEAN UNION - Discussion by Mapleleaf
The United Kingdom's bye bye to Europe - Discussion by Walter Hinteler
Sinti and Roma: History repeating - Discussion by Walter Hinteler
[B]THE RED ROSE COUNTY[/B] - Discussion by Mathos
Leaving today for Europe - Discussion by cicerone imposter
So you think you know Europe? - Discussion by nimh
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.09 seconds on 07/18/2025 at 09:49:26