@spendius,
No I'm not, I believe in equality across the board. I would make an exception if one partner was particularly domineering, but we're talking about two professionals here.
Let's not forget, she put her own neck in the noose when she mentioned her involvement in criminal activity once Huhne spurned her.
Spouses cannot be compelled to testify against their partners, but if they get involved in criminal activity then they're equally culpable.
Would you be as forgiving if she'd helped dispose of a body? I know that's an extreme example, but a zero tolerance approach is the only one that makes sense.
In any event, she's given her defence and it's down to a jury to decide whether or not it mitigates her behaviour sufficiently enough. I'll go along with whatever they decide one way or the other.
Sending upper middle class professionals to pokey sends a message to other white collar criminals.