@smorgs,
I saw the last 25 minutes whilst I was drying off on mi king size after mi daily soak. It was the usual type of history programme but exceptional for the miniscule nature of the budget. What I mean by usual is that the programme fulfilled the usual requirements which are--
1-To fill in the time in the TV schedules.
2- To retain as much of the programme's budget for salaries and expenses as possible.
3- To promote ticket sales etc at the sites where the original tapestry (it's not actually a proper tapestry) is exhibited in Normandy or the one where a Victorian copy is on display in Berkshire.
4- To allow the audience, which is basically sat on its arse in rest mode, to imagine they have learned some history so they can show off on various internet sites or in pub conversations and thus pose as intellectuals.
5- To enhance Prof Hudson's reputation as a skilled communicator and explicator of complex events with a few brush strokes designed to conceal the maidenly blushes involved in the generation of large armies.
It was a bit like covering the last few years in the UK with the tale of how Mr Blair was replaced by Mr Brown and his subsequent replacement by the Coalition of desperate office seekers.