55
   

THE BRITISH THREAD II

 
 
Ticomaya
 
  2  
Reply Fri 4 Dec, 2009 01:07 pm
June 12, 2010 ... U.S. v. England ... Round 2.

Group C looks tasty.
Diest TKO
 
  1  
Reply Fri 4 Dec, 2009 01:09 pm
@Ticomaya,
http://able2know.org/topic/135622-8#post-3835004

Join us.

T
K
O
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Fri 4 Dec, 2009 04:26 pm
I bet the NFL is hoping the US don't get to the final. America would go crazy.
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Fri 4 Dec, 2009 04:28 pm
@spendius,
I think the rule is that you can't meet a team in your group again unless it is in the final so a US v England final is a possibility.
0 Replies
 
McTag
 
  1  
Reply Fri 4 Dec, 2009 05:20 pm

Think England can beat the yanks?

The USA women's team is pretty formidable, I hear. Presumably these are the soccer moms.

btw if you don't remember McTag's factoid from times past.....
Do you know why SOCCER is so called?
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Fri 4 Dec, 2009 06:01 pm
@McTag,
No. Tell us again Mac.
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Fri 4 Dec, 2009 08:00 pm
@McTag,
McTag wrote:
Think England can beat the yanks?

I think you better. England beats US, no big deal. US beats England, you folks might be depressed for years.
Diest TKO
 
  1  
Reply Fri 4 Dec, 2009 08:13 pm
@Ticomaya,
Ticomaya wrote:

McTag wrote:
Think England can beat the yanks?

I think you better. England beats US, no big deal. US beats England, you folks might be depressed for years.

That's kind of the luxury of having nothing to lose and other teams not thinking much of you.

I've been saying I just want the US to win it's first match. I never thought it would be England. How exciting! This year I timed my England trip so I'd be there for Independence Day. Next year, I should go when we play and find a good sports bar to parade my US soccer jersey.

Yes, I'm crazy, but I'm fun.

T
K
O
0 Replies
 
McTag
 
  1  
Reply Sat 5 Dec, 2009 05:08 am
@Ticomaya,

Quote:
England beats US, no big deal. US beats England, you folks might be depressed for years.


You better believe it, baby.

And I think we've (they've....I'm not English) a poor record against the USA in World Cup competitions.
0 Replies
 
McTag
 
  1  
Reply Sat 5 Dec, 2009 05:09 am
@spendius,

Quote:
No. Tell us again Mac.


Spendy might be pulling my plonker. Does anyone else want to know?
Francis
 
  1  
Reply Sat 5 Dec, 2009 05:17 am
@McTag,
Anything to do with Mary, queen of Scots?

http://www.gavinrymill.com/images/socceries.gif
0 Replies
 
Ionus
 
  1  
Reply Sat 5 Dec, 2009 06:25 am
@McTag,
Havent heard it, Macker...I am all ears...
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Sat 5 Dec, 2009 09:10 am
@McTag,
McTag wrote:
Spendy might be pulling my plonker. Does anyone else want to know?

Assuming it is an interesting or at least humourous story, yes.
0 Replies
 
McTag
 
  1  
Reply Sat 5 Dec, 2009 10:38 am
@Ionus,
Quote:
Havent heard it, Macker...I am all ears...


Okay, soccer. Here's how it all started.

As you know, England, and Britain in general, invented a lot of games. And adapted and organised/standardised a few more....lawn tennis, badminton, cricket, ping-pong, golf, squash, polo, etc etc.
Presumably this was because we had unique conditions here, the first industrialised society, large middle class, numerous big boarding schools etc etc.

Mid to late victorian times, about then. Or before.

Anyway, we codified football into rugby football (first played at Rugby School), and formed the first football association for the other kind.

Rugby football came to be called "rugger" in the Woosterish fashion of the day, and Association Football came to be called soccer in the same way.

Assoc. Football = soccer, that's all.
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Sat 5 Dec, 2009 10:49 am
@McTag,
Do you seriously think Mac that that lot, which we all know anyway, is an explanation for why the word soccer is a name for proper football.

I expected an etymological explanation. The Shorter Oxford gives it as university slang from 1891 for association football.
McTag
 
  1  
Reply Sat 5 Dec, 2009 10:54 am
@spendius,

So I was right? Kewl. Late victorian too. Am I a genius, or what?
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Sat 5 Dec, 2009 11:09 am
@McTag,
Yes, a genius ... and you told that story with such enthusiasm.
0 Replies
 
Tarah
 
  1  
Reply Sat 5 Dec, 2009 12:41 pm
Thanks for that explanation. My daughter's boyfriend is a sports commentator (mainly American football), although he's English, I'll test his knowledge!
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Sat 5 Dec, 2009 04:31 pm
@Tarah,
Fancy Tarah being a mum of long standing.

I wonder if she's named after the Goddess Tarantha.
Ionus
 
  1  
Reply Sat 5 Dec, 2009 04:38 pm
@McTag,
I understood everything except "Late Victorian times, about ten to four..." ???
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

FOLLOWING THE EUROPEAN UNION - Discussion by Mapleleaf
The United Kingdom's bye bye to Europe - Discussion by Walter Hinteler
Sinti and Roma: History repeating - Discussion by Walter Hinteler
[B]THE RED ROSE COUNTY[/B] - Discussion by Mathos
Leaving today for Europe - Discussion by cicerone imposter
So you think you know Europe? - Discussion by nimh
 
  1. Forums
  2. » THE BRITISH THREAD II
  3. » Page 446
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.08 seconds on 05/10/2024 at 12:50:38