3
   

Million Atheist March

 
 
Reply Sun 4 Mar, 2007 06:00 pm
Was going to suggest it, except there aren't likely that many in the USA.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 3 • Views: 6,347 • Replies: 100

 
Shapeless
 
  1  
Reply Sun 4 Mar, 2007 07:40 pm
It's an interesting thought. What would you envision as the march's "cause"? To foster unity among atheists, or to call for "atheist activism," or to exhort atheists to be more vocal in politics, or to protest the treatment of atheists, etc.? Just curious.
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Sun 4 Mar, 2007 07:56 pm
Actually, I was watching the network newscast this afternoon; one of the features concerned an atheist organization, the biggest in the USA. They were demonstrating before the Supreme Court. I thought how they were a mirror of other organizations and the Million Man March flashed in my memory. I wondered how others would comment on such a thought.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Sun 4 Mar, 2007 09:41 pm
Shapeless wrote:
It's an interesting thought. What would you envision as the march's "cause"? To foster unity among atheists, or to call for "atheist activism," or to exhort atheists to be more vocal in politics, or to protest the treatment of atheists, etc.? Just curious.


We could have "a march about nothing".....I think I could pitch that concept...
0 Replies
 
JLNobody
 
  1  
Reply Sun 4 Mar, 2007 09:59 pm
Edgar, both are righteous minorities.

I saw an estmate on TV, that atheists are 2% of our population. It seems to me that that 2% is a population of people who know what they think and are forthright enough to present themselves as advocates of a deviant position. Those who said they were believers comprise an amorphous hodgepodge of variations in degree of actual belief and social integrity, i.e., they may very possibly say they are christians because of weakness before the interrogater.
0 Replies
 
Shapeless
 
  1  
Reply Sun 4 Mar, 2007 11:03 pm
Re: Million Atheist March
edgarblythe wrote:
...there aren't likely that many in the USA.


If the number that JLNobody cited is correct, it would put the atheist population at about 6,000,000.
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Sun 4 Mar, 2007 11:05 pm
Re: Million Atheist March
Shapeless wrote:
edgarblythe wrote:
...there aren't likely that many in the USA.


If the number hat JLNobody cited is correct, it would put the atheist population at about 6,000,000.


It's my wild guess that atheists are widely undercounted, because many possibly shun controversy.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Mon 5 Mar, 2007 12:41 am
Re: Million Atheist March
edgarblythe wrote:
Shapeless wrote:
edgarblythe wrote:
...there aren't likely that many in the USA.


If the number hat JLNobody cited is correct, it would put the atheist population at about 6,000,000.


It's my wild guess that atheists are widely undercounted, because many possibly shun controversy.


It still amazes me that there is an advanced western liberal democracy where atheism is seen as controversial.
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Mon 5 Mar, 2007 04:43 am
Atheists shun controversy? Laughing
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Mon 5 Mar, 2007 05:15 am
snood wrote:
Atheists shun controversy? Laughing



Whether they do or not, being an atheist is not controversial in most advanced western democracies, so their atheism ignites no controversy.
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Mon 5 Mar, 2007 05:26 am
Well, I can't speak for "most advanced Western democracies", but atheism is still pretty controversial in america. You deny that?
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Mon 5 Mar, 2007 05:46 am
When I was about twenty, I was on the verge of getting engaged. When I told her I was an atheist, the shi- -caca- -hit the fan. I was treated like a social misfit and informed that if we were married, I would be expected to attend a church every Sunday. Instead of getting engaged, I joined the military.

When I was twenty three, I wrote a paper defending evolution. When my aunt read it, I was ostracized from her home for the next forty years, until she died.

All of my life, when people learn my leaning in the matter, they have hollered at me, ridiculed me, and tried to force me to listen to their interpretation of the Bible.

Just a few examples.

Not controversial? You who don't think so obviously don't meet the same individuals I run across daily.
0 Replies
 
Phoenix32890
 
  1  
Reply Mon 5 Mar, 2007 05:58 am
I think that one of the problems that the US faces, in therms of atheism, was that of its most prominent spokesperson, Madlyn Murray O'Hair.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Madalyn_Murray_O'Hair

For years, she was the "face" of atheism, and an ugly one at that. I am not talking about her looks, but her entire persona, which was not very positive. I would suspect that even those people who agreed with her views, would shudder at Madlyn being the "poster girl" for the atheist movement.

0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Mon 5 Mar, 2007 06:00 am
snood wrote:
Well, I can't speak for "most advanced Western democracies", but atheism is still pretty controversial in america. You deny that?


Lol! Not at all. That is the opposite of my point.


I am pointing out how unusual the US is this regard.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Mon 5 Mar, 2007 06:01 am
Phoenix32890 wrote:
I think that one of the problems that the US faces, in therms of atheism, was that of its most prominent spokesperson, Madlyn Murray O'Hair.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Madalyn_Murray_O'Hair

For years, she was the "face" of atheism, and an ugly one at that. I am not talking about her looks, but her entire persona, which was not very positive. I would suspect that even those people who agreed with her views, would shudder at Madlyn being the "poster girl" for the atheist movement.




Atheism has a MOVEMENT?????!!!!!


I know agnosticism APPEARED to have a movement on A2k......but that was just Frank Apisa, all by himself.
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Mon 5 Mar, 2007 06:09 am
dlowan wrote:
snood wrote:
Well, I can't speak for "most advanced Western democracies", but atheism is still pretty controversial in america. You deny that?


Lol! Not at all. That is the opposite of my point.


I am pointing out how unusual the US is this regard.


In what advanced western democracy is atheism not controversial? And just for the record, saying that its true for all democracies except the US is kinda like saying DC is free of crime - except murder.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Mon 5 Mar, 2007 06:19 am
snood wrote:
dlowan wrote:
snood wrote:
Well, I can't speak for "most advanced Western democracies", but atheism is still pretty controversial in america. You deny that?


Lol! Not at all. That is the opposite of my point.


I am pointing out how unusual the US is this regard.


In what advanced western democracy is atheism not controversial? And just for the record, saying that its true for all democracies except the US is kinda like saying DC is free of crime - except murder.


Try reading, Snnod.


I spoke of advanced western democracies.


Uh...as to such countries where it isn't, try Australia, Canada, the UK, Germany, France...er struggling to think of another where it IS.



For helping you see the the difference in definitions?


Indonesia and Malaysia (ASIAN democracies) are examples of where atheism would be controversial, as might be India.
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Mon 5 Mar, 2007 06:32 am
You having trouble with the spelling of my name, or was that intentional pithy flavor?

"Try reading." Such bite. And I didn't even invite you to bite me.
0 Replies
 
Phoenix32890
 
  1  
Reply Mon 5 Mar, 2007 06:37 am
dlowan- For some reason, I am having trouble creating a link to the article about Madalyn Murray O'Hair. (Maybe god is out to get me! :wink: ) Just try Googling her.

Here is another , link that puts a positive spin on her life. I hope this works.


http://www.atheists.org/visitors.center/OHairFamily/
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Mon 5 Mar, 2007 06:40 am
Is the statement that "atheism is not controversial" in the above mentioned countries made from anecdotal/personal experience, or from something more substantial (or simply common knowledge, not subject to further examination)?
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

700 Inconsistencies in the Bible - Discussion by onevoice
Why do we deliberately fool ourselves? - Discussion by coincidence
Spirituality - Question by Miller
Oneness vs. Trinity - Discussion by Arella Mae
give you chills - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence for Evolution! - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence of God! - Discussion by Bartikus
One World Order?! - Discussion by Bartikus
God loves us all....!? - Discussion by Bartikus
The Preambles to Our States - Discussion by Charli
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Million Atheist March
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.09 seconds on 12/22/2024 at 11:19:09