noinipo wrote:infrablue, you are right. I thought of Lance Armstrong, but Merckx did much more to be the greatest, and most of it on his own.
Well, he really didn't do it on his own. Pro cycling is a team sport, and he had some of the best supporting riders, domestiques, on the teams that were assembled around him. His riders would suffer greatly working for him, average riders having to perform at his level, which was above and beyond average. Many would burn out in a few seasons, or would change teams because they couldn't maintain the level of performance that the job demanded of them.
Armstrong was the winningest
Tour de France rider ever, winning an unprecedented seven consecutive tours. That is no mean feat. But he did it at the expense of the rest of the pro racing season, ignoring the multitude of other races to concentrate on the Tour. Pro racing is much more than just the Tour. He won few other races, and he sold his sport short by ignoring those other races. Few of his fans know that there are other major national tours in pro bike racing, like the Giro d'Italia and the Ruta a España, and major one day races like Paris-Roubaix, Milan-San Remo, the Tour of Flanders, etc.