high seasQuote: The models referred to aren't using boundless functions; they're the same ones used for simulations of the nuclear arsenal. We know they work because actual experiments (back when testing nukes was permitted) confirm the models' predictions.
. I will stand corrected then. Im used to modelling of viscous v dynamics and mayhaps Im not familiar with the models you speak. However, most all models arent valued as forensic tools.
dapadQuote:Is accelration of temp variation, co2 builup, hole in the ozone layer, all since the industrial revolution a co-incidence?
Again, it appears that high seas and I are in the same bucket, you may be looking at an event bounded by your lifetime and failing to see trends(or perturbations) that span many multiple generations.
CO2 "sinks" have always been primarily the oceans. Seawater is naturally buffered by the CArbonic acid and can provide the free calcium ions upon which sealife builds its tests. Ive read that the normal oceanic sink for CO2 is over 70 Billion tons per year. Of course there are areas the the rate of issuance of Co2 is greater than a local sinks ability to take it up, then there are secondary sources including plantlife (which is a floating decimal)
Im only trying to present some geologic data that questions the consensus of scientific thought. Im not denying that, as a scientists who remanis skeptical, Im in a small minority. BUT, noone ever said that science is a democracy,.