Reply
Sat 6 Jan, 2007 11:28 am
Are we classifying the metaphysical, abstract as it is, as something unreal?
I asked the question in another thread, but it was a digression, so I'd rather ask it here.
rosborne interjected that to answer this question we must define the terms 'metaphysical' and 'unreal'.
Here's what wikipedia says:
"Metaphysics (from Greek: μετά (meta) = "after", φύσικα (phúsika) = "those on nature", derived from the arrangement of Aristotle's works in antiquity[1]) is the branch of philosophy concerned with explaining the nature of the world. It is the study of being or reality.[2] It addresses questions such as: What is the nature of reality? Is there a God? What is man's place in the universe?"
So the metaphysical is the world of ideas and abstract notions that we travel in whenever we're pondering reality.
Is this world a part of reality, or is it imagination?
Does it make any difference if we agree that imagination is something real?
meta-physical=other than realility. Aristotle was a fruitcake.
And if I said that we cannot understand reality save through a screen of the metaphysical world, how would you relate to that?