1
   

Big Bang or Never had a Begining.

 
 
Cyracuz
 
  1  
Reply Tue 2 Jan, 2007 05:24 pm
A problem I see is that these four fundamental forces are explained by two different sets of theories, and the two are not completely compatible.

ebrown touched on this earlier I think, with his post about quantum mechanics.

Gravity is explained in a completely different scale than the other three. Conventional physics explain gravity on a human level. I don't know what else to call it, because the science that explains it has grown to accomodate our senses (or extensions thereof in the form of microscopes, telescopes and so on).

Weak and strong nuclear force and electromagnetism are explained by quantum mechanics, and this operates on the level of atoms and smaller.

Now, as far as I know, only conventional science implies that there must be a beginning. I do not think it is required in QM.

I know that the dualistic notion of 'here and there' is meaningless in the world QM reveals. This may also be true for the dualistic notion of beginning and end.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

How can we be sure? - Discussion by Raishu-tensho
Proof of nonexistence of free will - Discussion by litewave
Destroy My Belief System, Please! - Discussion by Thomas
Star Wars in Philosophy. - Discussion by Logicus
Existence of Everything. - Discussion by Logicus
Is it better to be feared or loved? - Discussion by Black King
Paradigm shifts - Question by Cyracuz
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 1.71 seconds on 12/27/2024 at 07:20:43