Frank Apisa wrote:Doc
you wrote:
Quote: Not that it really matters, but no one disagrees with my premise? Just with my reasons for writing it?
I responded:
Quote:In your dreams, Doc, in your dreams.
My first post dealt specifically with your premise.
My first post quoted a significant part of your premise...specifically:
Quote:...Understanding that the bible, although certainly the word of God...
...
...and asked:
Quote:Since you know so much, perhaps you will share how you know this to be the case?
Since you are protesting that nobody is dealing with your premise -- perhaps you can explain why you have not responded to either of my questions.
Maybe if you took people up on their objections and rebuttals, you would feel so paranoid that people are ignoring you.
It has been a process of learning and growth since I wrote this. The NT is *not* the word of Elohim' or 'God' but the Torah, as 'Elohim' is defined, is.
As it came to man directly from the mouth of the Elohim of Israel. 'Elohim' as used in the bible is misleading. 'God', as we understand it, is not 'GOD' as the Elohim understand IT. Just think 'history', Annuniki, Sumeria.
When I wrote this, I still 'believed' the bible bit. Now, I *know* better.