1
   

Is euthanasia acceptable?

 
 
Bella Dea
 
  1  
Reply Wed 6 Dec, 2006 01:56 pm
Re: Is euthanasia acceptable?
real life wrote:

The people around Terri Schiavo, including her family and nurses who attended her state that she DID show signs of cognitive ability, she was not completely unconscious but woke and slept 'like a normal person'.

Terri also showed signs of recognition of people, responding positively to family and negatively to others including her husband, and following them visually around the room when they visited.


Many medical professionals begged to differ.
0 Replies
 
real life
 
  1  
Reply Wed 6 Dec, 2006 08:33 pm
Name one that had the opportunity to observe her repeatedly and routinely as did her family and the nurses that attended her.
0 Replies
 
Pauligirl
 
  1  
Reply Wed 6 Dec, 2006 10:21 pm
From the autopsy report
What diagnoses can be made in regards to the brain of Mrs. Schiavo? (see attached neuropathology report)
Mrs. Schiavo's brain showed marked global anoxic-ischemic encephalopathy resulting in missive cerebral atrophy. Her brain weight was approximately half of the expected weight. Of particular importance was the hypoxic damage and neuronal loss in her occipital lobes, which indicates cortical blindness. Her remaining brain regions also show severe hypoxic injury and neuronal atrophy/loss. No areas of recent or remote traumatic injury were found.

http://fl1.findlaw.com/news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/schiavo/61305autopsyrpt.pdf

From the Guardian Ad Litem report

The Schindler's new evidence ostensibly reflected adversely on Michael Schiavo's role as Guardian. It related to his personal romantic life, the fact that he had relationships with other women, that he had allegedly failed to provide appropriate care and treatment for Theresa, that he was wasting the assets within the guardianship account, and that he was no longer competent to represent Theresa's best interests

Testimony provided by members of the Schindler family included very personal statements about their desire and intention to ensure that Theresa remain alive. Throughout the course of the litigation, deposition and trial testimony by members of the Schindler family voiced the disturbing belief that they would keep Theresa alive at any and all costs. Nearly gruesome examples were given, eliciting agreement by family members that in the event Theresa should contract diabetes and subsequent gangrene in each of her limbs, they would agree to amputate each limb, and would then, were she to be diagnosed with heart disease, perform open heart surgery. There was additional, difficult testimony that appeared to establish that despite the sad and undesirable condition of Theresa, the parents still derived joy from having her alive, even if Theresa might not be at all aware of her environment given the persistent vegetative state. Within the testimony, as part of the hypotheticals presented, Schindler family members stated that even if Theresa had told them of her intention to have artificial nutrition withdrawn, they would not do it. Throughout this painful and difficult trial, the family acknowledged that Theresa was in a diagnosed persistent vegetative state.
The court denied the Schindler's motions to remove the guardian, allowing that the evidence was not sufficient and in some instances, not relevant. It set a date for the artificial life support to be discontinued, as of 24 April 2001.

In Re: Theresa Marie Schiavo, Incapacitated Report to Gov. Jeb Bush and the 6t` Florida Judicial Circuit 1 December 2003 Jay Wolfson, as Guardian Ad Litem to Theresa Marie Schiavo Page 14 of 38
http://fl1.findlaw.com/news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/schiavo/1203galrpt.pdf

Other legal documents
http://news.findlaw.com/legalnews/lit/schiavo/


this Dr. disagrees with the findings, but then, he didn't examine her.
http://www.catholicnewsagency.com/new.php?n=4240
Thomas Zabiega, M.D., Vice President for Legislative Affairs for the Catholic Physicians' Guild The Catholic Physicians' Guild of Chicago is a local chapter of the 6000 member strong National Federation of Catholic Physicians' Guilds. Members are dedicated to the "Service of God and man". This goal is accomplished through prayer, serious examination of moral issues and camaraderie among guild members.
http://www.illinoiscma.org/Chicago.html


Also, one the arguments that kept coming up was the lack of of an MRI to diagnose a persistent vegetive state. It was noted in the findlaw docs that Mrs. Schivo could not be given an MRI because of a implant.

Now, with all that said, it's my opinion that the whole thing should have been handled differently. Mr. Schivo should have been removed as her guardian. He had moved on with his life and should have given her care over to her parents. I do believe as time went by and it became very apparent that they were not going to get their daughter back as she was, it might have become easier for them to let go of her and say goodby.
0 Replies
 
real life
 
  1  
Reply Thu 7 Dec, 2006 09:13 pm
Pauligirl wrote:
From the autopsy report
What diagnoses can be made in regards to the brain of Mrs. Schiavo? (see attached neuropathology report)
Mrs. Schiavo's brain showed marked global anoxic-ischemic encephalopathy resulting in missive cerebral atrophy. Her brain weight was approximately half of the expected weight. Of particular importance was the hypoxic damage and neuronal loss in her occipital lobes, which indicates cortical blindness. Her remaining brain regions also show severe hypoxic injury and neuronal atrophy/loss. No areas of recent or remote traumatic injury were found.

http://fl1.findlaw.com/news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/schiavo/61305autopsyrpt.pdf

From the Guardian Ad Litem report

The Schindler's new evidence ostensibly reflected adversely on Michael Schiavo's role as Guardian. It related to his personal romantic life, the fact that he had relationships with other women, that he had allegedly failed to provide appropriate care and treatment for Theresa, that he was wasting the assets within the guardianship account, and that he was no longer competent to represent Theresa's best interests

Testimony provided by members of the Schindler family included very personal statements about their desire and intention to ensure that Theresa remain alive. Throughout the course of the litigation, deposition and trial testimony by members of the Schindler family voiced the disturbing belief that they would keep Theresa alive at any and all costs. Nearly gruesome examples were given, eliciting agreement by family members that in the event Theresa should contract diabetes and subsequent gangrene in each of her limbs, they would agree to amputate each limb, and would then, were she to be diagnosed with heart disease, perform open heart surgery. There was additional, difficult testimony that appeared to establish that despite the sad and undesirable condition of Theresa, the parents still derived joy from having her alive, even if Theresa might not be at all aware of her environment given the persistent vegetative state. Within the testimony, as part of the hypotheticals presented, Schindler family members stated that even if Theresa had told them of her intention to have artificial nutrition withdrawn, they would not do it. Throughout this painful and difficult trial, the family acknowledged that Theresa was in a diagnosed persistent vegetative state.
The court denied the Schindler's motions to remove the guardian, allowing that the evidence was not sufficient and in some instances, not relevant. It set a date for the artificial life support to be discontinued, as of 24 April 2001.

In Re: Theresa Marie Schiavo, Incapacitated Report to Gov. Jeb Bush and the 6t` Florida Judicial Circuit 1 December 2003 Jay Wolfson, as Guardian Ad Litem to Theresa Marie Schiavo Page 14 of 38
http://fl1.findlaw.com/news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/schiavo/1203galrpt.pdf

Other legal documents
http://news.findlaw.com/legalnews/lit/schiavo/


this Dr. disagrees with the findings, but then, he didn't examine her.
http://www.catholicnewsagency.com/new.php?n=4240
Thomas Zabiega, M.D., Vice President for Legislative Affairs for the Catholic Physicians' Guild The Catholic Physicians' Guild of Chicago is a local chapter of the 6000 member strong National Federation of Catholic Physicians' Guilds. Members are dedicated to the "Service of God and man". This goal is accomplished through prayer, serious examination of moral issues and camaraderie among guild members.
http://www.illinoiscma.org/Chicago.html


Also, one the arguments that kept coming up was the lack of of an MRI to diagnose a persistent vegetive state. It was noted in the findlaw docs that Mrs. Schivo could not be given an MRI because of a implant.

Now, with all that said, it's my opinion that the whole thing should have been handled differently. Mr. Schivo should have been removed as her guardian. He had moved on with his life and should have given her care over to her parents. I do believe as time went by and it became very apparent that they were not going to get their daughter back as she was, it might have become easier for them to let go of her and say goodby.


I agree that Michael should have been removed as guardian due to financial misappropriation of the money that was to have paid for Teri's rehab, and his obvious conflict of interest as a husband cheating on his wife.

You cite the autopsy report, which I have seen partially recounted as well.

My opinion is that the brain atrophy may not be inconsistent with one who was starved and deprived of hydration on several occasions (as the feeding and water were removed, then reinstated, then again, etc I forget how many times but at least twice I think food and water were withdrawn), and finally met her death thru starvation and dehydration.

It doesn't seem to be something that anyone has the courage to address much, but what would YOUR brain look like if several attempts had been made to starve you and then one attempt finally succeeded?
0 Replies
 
Pauligirl
 
  1  
Reply Thu 7 Dec, 2006 10:35 pm
real life wrote:

I agree that Michael should have been removed as guardian due to financial misappropriation of the money that was to have paid for Teri's rehab, and his obvious conflict of interest as a husband cheating on his wife.

You cite the autopsy report, which I have seen partially recounted as well.

My opinion is that the brain atrophy may not be inconsistent with one who was starved and deprived of hydration on several occasions (as the feeding and water were removed, then reinstated, then again, etc I forget how many times but at least twice I think food and water were withdrawn), and finally met her death thru starvation and dehydration.

It doesn't seem to be something that anyone has the courage to address much, but what would YOUR brain look like if several attempts had been made to starve you and then one attempt finally succeeded?


I don't know. Since there's no "before" to compare it to, there's no way of knowing. But after watching the videos, to me it seemed there was no hope for recovery. I know her parents loved her very much, but they saw what they wanted/needed to see and just wanted her alive at all costs. I don't know if keeping someone in that shape alive just because you can't bear for them to die is the right thing to do. The daughter they loved was already gone. All that was left was a shell.

This whole thing was just handled badly.
P
0 Replies
 
real life
 
  1  
Reply Fri 8 Dec, 2006 12:10 am
Pauligirl wrote:
real life wrote:

I agree that Michael should have been removed as guardian due to financial misappropriation of the money that was to have paid for Teri's rehab, and his obvious conflict of interest as a husband cheating on his wife.

You cite the autopsy report, which I have seen partially recounted as well.

My opinion is that the brain atrophy may not be inconsistent with one who was starved and deprived of hydration on several occasions (as the feeding and water were removed, then reinstated, then again, etc I forget how many times but at least twice I think food and water were withdrawn), and finally met her death thru starvation and dehydration.

It doesn't seem to be something that anyone has the courage to address much, but what would YOUR brain look like if several attempts had been made to starve you and then one attempt finally succeeded?


I don't know. Since there's no "before" to compare it to, there's no way of knowing. But after watching the videos, to me it seemed there was no hope for recovery. I know her parents loved her very much, but they saw what they wanted/needed to see and just wanted her alive at all costs. I don't know if keeping someone in that shape alive just because you can't bear for them to die is the right thing to do. The daughter they loved was already gone. All that was left was a shell.

This whole thing was just handled badly.
P


Those who saw her daily, including some of her nurses, would disagree with your assessment that she was a 'shell'.

http://www.blogsforterri.com/archives/2005/03/former_nurse_re.php

As I said, I agree with you that it was handled badly. There was clear cause to remove Michael as guardian, due to both financial misconduct and due to conflict of interest, and any honest judge would have done so.
0 Replies
 
Pauligirl
 
  1  
Reply Fri 8 Dec, 2006 09:27 pm
real life wrote:

Those who saw her daily, including some of her nurses, would disagree with your assessment that she was a 'shell'.

http://www.blogsforterri.com/archives/2005/03/former_nurse_re.php

As I said, I agree with you that it was handled badly. There was clear cause to remove Michael as guardian, due to both financial misconduct and due to conflict of interest, and any honest judge would have done so.


http://abstractappeal.com/schiavo/trialctorder0903.pdf
Greer dismissed Iyer's charges, noting that they -- along with a similar affidavit given by Heidi Law, another nurse who formerly took care of Terri Schiavo -- were "incredible to say the least" and that "[n]either in the testimony nor in the medical records is there support for these affidavits as they purport to detail activities and responses of Terri Schiavo." From Greer's decision:
The remaining affidavits deal exclusively with events which allegedly occurred in the 1995-1997 time frame. The court feels constrained to discuss them. They are incredible to say the least. Ms. Iyer details what amounts to a 15-month cover-up which would include the staff of Palm Garden of Lago Convalescent Center, the Guardian of the Person, the Guardian ad Litem, the medical professionals, the police and, believe it or not, Mr. and Mrs. Schindler. Her affidavit clearly states that she would "call them (Mr. and Mrs. Schindler) anyway because I thought they should know about their daughter." The affidavit of Ms. Law speaks of Terri responding on a constant basis. Neither in the testimony nor in the medical records is there support for these affidavits as they purport to detail activities and responses of Terri Schiavo. It is impossible to believe that Mr. and Mrs. Schindler would not have subpoenaed Ms. Iyer for the January 2000 evidentiary hearing had she contacted them as her affidavit alleges.

I wonder why?
And I was wrong. There is a "before."
A CT scan was done in 2002.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7328639/

http://msnbcmedia4.msn.com/j/msnbc/Components/Photos/050329/050329_schiavoCT_hmed_1p.standard.jpg
Left: CT scan of a normal 25 year old; Right, Terri Schiavo's most recent scan

ABRAMS: Let's talk about the CT scan. You actually have the CT scan.
CRANFORD: Yes, this is a CT scan of Terri Schiavo taken in 2002, the most recent CT scan done on her, 2002.
ABRAMS: Tell us what it means.
CRANFORD: Well it shows extremely severe atrophy. Where those black areas are, that should be white. That should be cerebral cortex, and so really there is no cerebral cortex left. It's just a shrinkage of the cerebral cortex. It's a thin band of white on the outside and any neurologist or any radiologist looking at those CT scans will tell you that her atrophy could not be more severe than it is. So even if she were mentally conscious, which she's not, she's irreversible. She's been like this for 15 years, Dan, and that CT scan shows the most extreme severe atrophy of the higher centers of the brain.



Abstract of the Nov. 22, 2002 appeal

http://abstractappeal.com/schiavo/trialctorder11-02.txt
0 Replies
 
maporsche
 
  1  
Reply Sat 9 Dec, 2006 12:02 am
Oh yeah, and she was BLIND

Quote:


If you don't like that link, here are a few thousand more:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&sa=X&oi=spell&resnum=0&ct=result&cd=1&q=terri+schiavo+blind&spell=1
0 Replies
 
real life
 
  1  
Reply Sun 10 Dec, 2006 04:10 am
maporsche wrote:
Oh yeah, and she was BLIND

Quote:


If you don't like that link, here are a few thousand more:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&sa=X&oi=spell&resnum=0&ct=result&cd=1&q=terri+schiavo+blind&spell=1


I agree she was probably blind as she died.

Was she blind before she was forcibly dehydrated and starved for days?

And even if she had been blind for 20 years, is that a good reason to kill her?
0 Replies
 
maporsche
 
  1  
Reply Sun 10 Dec, 2006 11:37 am
real life wrote:
maporsche wrote:
Oh yeah, and she was BLIND

Quote:


If you don't like that link, here are a few thousand more:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&sa=X&oi=spell&resnum=0&ct=result&cd=1&q=terri+schiavo+blind&spell=1


I agree she was probably blind as she died.

Was she blind before she was forcibly dehydrated and starved for days?

And even if she had been blind for 20 years, is that a good reason to kill her?


Yes
Yes
No, not alone. But her following a balloon is one of the reasons that people used to keep her alive, and she was blind at the time.
0 Replies
 
real life
 
  1  
Reply Sun 10 Dec, 2006 03:13 pm
maporsche wrote:
real life wrote:
maporsche wrote:
Oh yeah, and she was BLIND

Quote:


If you don't like that link, here are a few thousand more:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&sa=X&oi=spell&resnum=0&ct=result&cd=1&q=terri+schiavo+blind&spell=1


I agree she was probably blind as she died.

Was she blind before she was forcibly dehydrated and starved for days?

And even if she had been blind for 20 years, is that a good reason to kill her?


Yes
Yes
No, not alone. But her following a balloon is one of the reasons that people used to keep her alive, and she was blind at the time.


How do you know she was blind at that particular time?

How did she 'appear to' visually track a balloon floating in the room, if she was blind?

So, if blindness alone was not enough to kill her, why do you think she should have died?

There are videos of her laughing at a joke, visually tracking a balloon, etc.

For which of these did you think she deserved to die?
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

700 Inconsistencies in the Bible - Discussion by onevoice
Why do we deliberately fool ourselves? - Discussion by coincidence
Spirituality - Question by Miller
Oneness vs. Trinity - Discussion by Arella Mae
give you chills - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence for Evolution! - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence of God! - Discussion by Bartikus
One World Order?! - Discussion by Bartikus
God loves us all....!? - Discussion by Bartikus
The Preambles to Our States - Discussion by Charli
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 04/18/2024 at 07:42:13