25
   

FOLLOWING THE EUROPEAN UNION

 
 
nimh
 
  1  
Mon 14 May, 2007 02:39 pm
Walter Hinteler wrote:
I don't find it surpring that the losses by the 'great coalition' governmental parties went either to the left (here: Greens) or right (liberals), but to the more extreme left (Left party) as well.

And how!

I'm not surprised that the Linkspartei would share in the influx of disappointed voters of the government parties either - but damn, I would never have thought that it would become by far the single biggest winner!

In national polls, the Greens appear to benefit more from the defection of Socialdemocratic voters, with the Left Party remaining more or less stable. But now here in these actual elections, the Left Party has won more than the Greens, liberals and far-right added up together!

Pretty sensational stuff. Bremen had always yielded one of the better scores (relatively speaking) in the West for the former communist PDS, but here too, its connection with the former East-German regime kept its appeal limited to around 2%. The Left Party obviously doesnt suffer in any similar way from such an association, and jumps into fourth place.

Particular good news in combination with the near-stagnation of the far-right DVU. One thing I was afraid of with a "grand coalition" in power, was that disappointed working class voters, who are unlikely to switch either to the pro-business liberals or to the alternative idealists of the Green Party, would be pulled in by the extreme right, like happened in France and, momentarily, Holland. But it looks like the Left Party is successfully functioning as a leftwing focus of protest votes.

And it's got to be a healthy thing for the Left Party too, to see an inflow of West-voters and become younger and more pluralistic.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Mon 14 May, 2007 03:09 pm
The right only is relatively strong in the Bremerhaven (which is part of the state of Bremen).

DVU and another (local) right-wing party ['Citizens in Rage'] three seats each in the Bremerhaven town council; DVU one seat in the state parliament.
Bremerhaven online

TAZ Bremen
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Wed 16 May, 2007 11:04 am

Summary:

Quote:
A short ceremony was held in the Czech capital to commemorate the thousands of Russian émigrés who were illegally abducted by the Soviet secret police at the close of World War Two. The abductions began as soon as the Red Army arrived in Czechoslovakia in 1944, and continued long after it arrived in Prague in May 1945. Only a handful ever returned.

Vladimir Bystrov, founder of "They Were The First" and son of one of the victims, stresses how these people, most of them fully-fledged Czechoslovak citizens, were abducted from their homes as the authorities looked on - and how this happened years before 1948, when the communists took power outright.
0 Replies
 
dagmaraka
 
  1  
Wed 16 May, 2007 07:02 pm
That was only small part of it. There was also the "Optation" that pushed out over 20,000 people from Eastern Slovakia to the USSR. They went "voluntarily" to find work there. Many ended up in work camps. Never to return. Most were ehtnic Ukrainians (or Ruthenians) and possibly many did go voluntarily as the Transcarpathian Ruthenia (? Podkarpatska Rus) went to USSR after the war, yet they went under false promises. Others were 'helped' to go by the army and the locals.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Thu 17 May, 2007 01:56 am
French President Nicolas Sarkozy on Wednesday travelled to Berlin for talks with Chancellor Angela Merkel, making his first trip abroad just hours after he took over from Jacques Chirac.


Angie and Sarko. The new European dream team?

http://i10.tinypic.com/6ex8y03.jpg
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Thu 17 May, 2007 06:41 am
Walter Hinteler wrote:
Angie and Sarko. The new European dream team?

http://i10.tinypic.com/6ex8y03.jpg

Yuck..
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Fri 18 May, 2007 12:16 am
Quote:
Eastern European woes ruin Merkel's grand plans for EU alliance with Russia

· Poland and Lithuania wanted summit called off
· Germany had hoped for a deal on climate change


Ian Traynor in Brussels and Luke Harding in Moscow
Friday May 18, 2007
The Guardian

Germany's hopes of striking a new grand bargain between Russia and Europe, locking both into a close embrace for years to come, have been dashed before a crucial EU-Russia summit.
As the German chancellor, Angela Merkel, flew to Samara on the Volga last night for dinner with President Vladimir Putin and to open today's summit, it was clear that the meeting was being hijacked by a long list of disputes focused on eastern Europe and the Balkans.

Currently chairing the EU, Germany has prepared the summit as an opportunity to secure Russian agreements on energy security, human rights and climate change. But Berlin's wooing of Moscow has fallen foul of the worsening estrangement between President Putin and the west in recent months.
Tension between Russia and the west, hostility towards Russia from the new eastern European members of the EU (and their suspicion of Berlin), and President Vladimir Putin's brash assertion of regained Russian power have all compounded the mood of gloom.

Ms Merkel has won widespread plaudits this year for her steering of the EU. But Germany has a huge stake in the Samara summit and it looks like being a failure for Ms Merkel.

The new EU member states of Poland and Lithuania have been arguing this week for the summit to be called off, and criticising the German preparations. For historical reasons, the east Europeans are highly sensitive to any sign of Germany cutting deals with Russia over their heads.

The immediate cause of the impasse is a Polish veto on launching negotiations on what is known as the partnership and cooperation agreement, or PCA, between the EU and Russia - because of a continuing Russian ban on Polish meat imports.

But the roots of the estrangement lie in the transformation of the EU with the entry of 10 central European and Balkan states since 2004 - all of them former Soviet satellites nursing grievances to varying degrees against Russia. Vladimir Chizhov, Russia's ambassador in Brussels, said the relationship was "more complicated" since the accession of Poland, the Baltic states, and other former Soviet dependencies: "Some of these countries continue to treat Russia in a peculiar manner."

Both sides have a huge stake in a successful partnership. Many European countries, especially eastern Europe and Germany, depend on Russian gas and oil supplies, while more than half of Russia's trade is with the EU. But the eastern Europeans are incensed at Russian efforts to play off "old" versus "new" Europe and at the condescending tone they hear from Moscow. On Wednesday the Kremlin's EU envoy, Sergei Yastrzhembsky, said some of the eastern European governments had "complexes". "Our old and trusted EU partners recognise this," he said, while accusing Estonia of barbarism and of trying to rewrite the history of the second world war.

Ms Merkel had made the ambitious new pact with Russia a centrepiece of her EU presidency, a comprehensive deal designed to replace a 10-year agreement that expires this year. Instead, the summit could turn into a showdown.
Source
0 Replies
 
Steve 41oo
 
  1  
Fri 18 May, 2007 04:11 am
Walter Hinteler wrote:
French President Nicolas Sarkozy on Wednesday travelled to Berlin for talks with Chancellor Angela Merkel, making his first trip abroad just hours after he took over from Jacques Chirac.


Angie and Sarko. The new European dream team?

http://i10.tinypic.com/6ex8y03.jpg
So again the Franco-German axis is revived. Actually Nicolas was going to come to London, but he didn't know who to ask for, Gordon or Tony.

btw is his first name Nicolas or Nicola? I hear it pronounced without the s making it sound feminine..or is that just the way the french say it?
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Fri 18 May, 2007 05:11 am
Steve 41oo wrote:

btw is his first name Nicolas or Nicola? I hear it pronounced without the s making it sound feminine..or is that just the way the french say it?


It is Nicolas - pronounced without the 's' = pronouciation @ wikipedia

(376.946 male French have this prenom vs 233 females, all with 's' but pronounced without [data from 2006])
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Sun 20 May, 2007 01:40 am
In today's Washington Post Sunday (page A17)

http://i16.tinypic.com/660wk6u.jpg

http://i10.tinypic.com/66br1jm.jpg

Quote:
[...]
All three new European leaders are replacing predecessors who had become national and international liabilities. Nicolas Sarkozy, 52, took over the presidency of France on Wednesday from septuagenarian Jacques Chirac, who served 12 years. Gordon Brown, 56, will become prime minister of Britain on June 27 when Tony Blair leaves after 10 years. And Angela Merkel, 53, was named chancellor of Germany in 2005, after Gerhard Schroeder's seven years in power.

The new axis of leaders is expected to moderate Europe's relationship with the United States, striking a more evenhanded tone than the emotionalism of Blair's perceived subservience or Chirac's hostility, many analysts here say.

In this view, a new U.S. president in less than two years could work with a more united, engaged Europe to leverage Middle East peace efforts, persuade Iran to curtail its nuclear ambitions and negotiate with Russia over contentious energy issues.

[...]
0 Replies
 
Steve 41oo
 
  1  
Sun 20 May, 2007 01:42 pm
Walter Hinteler wrote:
Steve 41oo wrote:

btw is his first name Nicolas or Nicola? I hear it pronounced without the s making it sound feminine..or is that just the way the french say it?


It is Nicolas - pronounced without the 's' = pronouciation @ wikipedia

(376.946 male French have this prenom vs 233 females, all with 's' but pronounced without [data from 2006])
Thanks Walter. I am beginning to rely on you for common sense information.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Tue 22 May, 2007 05:24 pm
So long as you keep relying on me for nutter wacko information.

(Wacko? Whacko?)
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Tue 22 May, 2007 05:36 pm
(Nutter wacko? Wacko nutter?)
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Tue 22 May, 2007 05:37 pm
Bulgaria had its first elections for the European Parliament. The elections were overshadowed by corruption scandals that kept turnout low (at around 30%), and gave a newly-founded populist opposition party an electoral boost.

Interesting to me (professional deformation) was that the ethnic Turkish Movement for Rights and Freedoms (MRF) received a record 20% of the vote. This is especially striking since some 100-200 thousand habitual MRF voters who reside in Turkey had been struck from the voter rolls by a new law, which removed voting rights from those who did not live in the EU for three of the last six months.

The measure must have mobilised the already disciplined Turkish electorate within Bulgaria all the more, and with such low turnout, effective mobilisation is able to achieve a lot.

The party's score also serves as a counterbalance to the gains made by the nationalist "Attack" party (nomen est omen), which received 14%.

All news summaries below mine.

Quote:
Scandal fogs Bulgaria's first EU elections

International Herald Tribune
May 17, 2007

Summary:

Voter turnout is predicted to be low as Bulgaria prepares for its first elections for the European Parliament. The campaign was eclipsed by the country's biggest corruption scandal to date, when the director of the National Investigative Service accused Minister Ovcharov of interfering in a high-level corruption investigation. The scandal eroded support for the front-running Socialists, benefiting the new center-right party of Sofia mayor Boyko Borisov.

Meanwhile, a requirement that voters must have lived in the EU for three of the last six months, which removed 185,662 citizens residing in Turkey from the lists, was seen as a blow against the ethnic Turkish party MRF. Many ethnic Turks who fled Bulgaria in 1989 often return during elections to vote for the MRF.


Quote:
Euro vote result a warning to Bulgarian government

May 21
Reuters

Summary:

Bulgaria's opposition narrowly won European Parliament elections on Sunday, sending a warning shot to the Socialist-led government that it needs to get serious about fighting crime and corruption.

The ruling coalition, which was caught in a graft scandal after the country joined the EU in January, polled about 48%, way below the almost two thirds it got in general elections in 2005.

The Socialists of PM Stanishev won 21%, finishing narrowly behind the new rightist GERB party of Sofia mayor Borissov. Both parties as well as the ethnic Turkish MRF party should win five of the 18 European Parliament seats.


Quote:
Bulgaria: GERB Narrowly Wins Ballot for EU Assembly

21 05 2007
Balkan Insight

Summary:

The newly-founded party Citizens for the European Development of Bulgaria, GERB, emerged as the surprise winner in Bulgaria's first election for the European parliament.

GERB received 21.7% of the vote, and the ruling Bulgarian Socialist Party, BSP, 21.4%. One of the BSP's government coalition partners, the Movement for Rights and Freedoms (DPS), received 20.3%; and the far right party Ataka, 14.2%. The fragmented parliamentary opposition parties did not receive enough votes for even a single seat. Voter turnout was low, under 30%.

"We represent a real alternative as a political party in the centre right," GERB's deputy head said. But its opponents criticised the party for lacking a clear platform and political orientation. GERB plays "left with the left [parties] and right with the right", said PM Stanishev.

The DPS, which traditionally represents Bulgaria's ethnic Turkish minority, received substantial support despite a recent law which deprived the DPS of some 100,000 votes it would have received from Bulgarian Turks living in Turkey.


Quote:
Turkish party in Bulgaria wins seats in European Parliament

Zaman
22.05.07

Summary:

Bulgaria's Movement for Rights and Freedoms (MRF), the party of the Turkish minority, seemed poised to win five seats in the European Parliament after a surprisingly successful elections performance.

Exit poll results indicated it ranked third and stood at 20.3%. "This is the MRF's moment of glory," said its leader Ahmet Doğan. The MRF victory elicited anger from the ultranationalist Attack party, which is projected to secure three seats.


Regarding that law that removed Turkish Bulgarian citizens residing in Turkey from the voter lists, I found this juicy (if appalling) background from when it was still under discussion:

Quote:
Turkish Voting Rights Come Under Attack in Bulgaria

SEE Online
8 February 2007

Summary:

"Bulgaria will be Turkey's Trojan horse in the EU!" shouted Mihail Konstaninov. The member of the Central Elections Committee raised his voice in fury during a parliamentary debate that had deputies nearly getting into a fist fight.

The furore concerns the 100,000 odd votes that may come from Bulgarian Turks living in Turkey if the national assembly allows them to vote for candidates in the European parliament. Some say the deputies, elected with their votes, will be in fact representatives of Turkey, not of Bulgaria.

But the issue also reflects a battle between opposition parties and the ruling coalition (which includes a party representing the country's ethnic Turks, the DPS) over a law that the former fear would win the governing parties more votes in future polls. Over the past 16 years, the Turkish community has proved well-organised in its voting and committed to the DPS.

The opposition parties insist that only permanent residents in Bulgaria should vote, while the ruling coalition wants to allow every citizen to be enfranchised regardless of where he or she resides. No EU regulation exists to tell national parliaments how to deal with the issue of people voting outside national borders.

On Thursday, eighty deputies walked out, depriving the assembly of the necessary voting quorum.
0 Replies
 
HokieBird
 
  1  
Thu 31 May, 2007 07:58 am
Continental Drift
Europe shows signs of life, but Walter Laqueur argues that it's still dying.

BY GERARD BAKER
Thursday, May 31, 2007 12:01 a.m.

If you've heard the celebratory noises coming out of European capitals of late, you could be forgiven for thinking that, as with Mark Twain's prematurely recorded demise, reports of Europe's death may have been greatly exaggerated. For a continent in the supposed grip of demographic implosion, economic stagnation, political paralysis and existential anomie, the news has been oddly cheerful recently.

In the past year, the rate of economic growth in the eurozone has actually overtaken that of the U.S. The market capitalization of companies quoted on European stock exchanges has surpassed American corporate worth for the first time ever. London has edged ahead of New York in most categories as global financial capital. The euro, closely watched in Europe as a barometer of continental self-respect, is close to its highest level ever against the dollar.

Even Europe's infamous political stasis may be giving way to a hint of dynamism. In Germany, Chancellor Angela Merkel's coalition government has defied the odds and pulled off small but important economic reforms. In Nicolas Sarkozy, the French have elected a man so committed to recasting the country's economy that he is widely viewed among the liberal elites as a dangerous radical.

All this could not have come at a more opportune moment. The European Union's leaders are in the midst of lengthy celebrations to mark the 50th anniversary of the founding of the European Communities. At the same time, the gloom that enveloped the EU after the French and Dutch rejected its beloved constitutional treaty two years ago has been replaced by a restrained optimism that the show might just be put back on the road this summer.

Is it possible, then, that the writers who have spent the past few years predicting Europe's collapse could be wrong? The short answer is: no. Even a corpse has been known to twitch once or twice before the rigor mortis sets in. The longer answer is provided by Walter Laqueur in "The Last Days of Europe," one of the more persuasive in a long line of volumes by authors on both sides of the Atlantic chronicling Europe's decline and foretelling its collapse.

Unlike the Euro-bashing polemics of a few of those authors, Mr. Laqueur's short book is measured, even sympathetic. It is mercifully free of references to cheese-eating surrender monkeys and misplaced historical analogies to appeasement. The tone is one of resigned dismay rather than grave-stomping glee. This temperate quality makes the book's theme--that Europe now faces potentially mortal challenges--all the more compelling.

The demographic problem is by now so familiar that it hardly bears restating. Mr. Laqueur notes that the average European family had five children in the 19th century; today it has fewer than two, a trend that will shrink the continent's population in the next century on a scale unprecedented in modern history.

The failure of Europeans to reproduce makes it vulnerable to internal schism. Too often Europe has reacted to the growing threat posed by extremists among its minorities with a tolerance and self-criticism that has bordered on capitulation. Meanwhile, social tensions increase, not least because of high emigration to Europe from Muslim countries and high birth rates among Muslim populations. No one has yet found a good way of integrating those populations into mainstream European society.

Even as the challenge from fanatical Islam has intensified, at home and abroad, Europeans have found new ways to abase themselves before it. Two years ago it was the Danish cartoons affair, in which too few politicians and opinion leaders defended the rights of the Danish newspaper that published them; last year it was the collective European cringe in the wake of the pope's mildly assertive remarks about the disconnect between Islam and reason; this year it has been the embarrassing spectacle of humiliated British servicemen fawning in front of their Iranian captors.

In the economic field, Europe is celebrating a growth rate of 2.5% annually; in the U.S. a similar pace is regarded as a crisis. Meanwhile unemployment remains brutally high and productivity stagnant. Mr. Laqueur notes that Europeans sometimes embrace their economic sluggishness as part of their "soft power" appeal: all those 35-hour weeks, long vacations and generous social benefits. But the long-term cost of their welfare states--and their confiscatory tax rates--may eventually make such luxuries unaffordable.

Mr. Laqueur ponders whether Europe will really surrender to these adverse trends or finally resist. He is not optimistic. Perhaps Europeans will find ways to bolster their birth rates. Perhaps they will stiffen in the face of an escalating terrorist threat. Perhaps Muslims will assimilate better into Europe's democratic and tolerant societies. Perhaps the pro-American sensibilities and the pro-growth nimbleness of Eastern European countries will drive the rest of the Continent out of the ditch of stagnation and pacifism. Perhaps.

But then again, as Mr. Laqueur observes, museums are filled with the remnants of vanished civilizations. Abroad, the U.S. has long surpassed Europe in power, influence and economic dynamism; Asia may do so before long. At home, a profound demoralization has set in, induced in part by the continent's ruinous past century.

It was a century in which unimaginable violence sapped the regenerative energies of a wearied people; in which the seductive falsehoods of twin totalitarian ideologies undermined moral self-confidence; in which a flaccid relativism replaced the firm ethical boundaries of religious belief. It was also a century, we now see, in which the luxuries of rapid economic growth produced a false sense of security that cannot be sustained in a global age.

Not dead yet, maybe. But even Mark Twain succumbed eventually to the obituary writers.

http://www.opinionjournal.com/la/?id=110010144
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Thu 31 May, 2007 02:46 pm
Many Portuguese pensioners get just $75 a month??? Jeebus, no wonder there's still a strong communist union there.



This story comes in two parts, really - second half is esp. revealing.

On the strike and the political context

Quote:
The economic decline of Portugal's middle class, the growing marginalisation of the poorest of the poor, the uncertainty facing young people and drastic measures -- described by critics as "neoliberal" -- adopted by the socialist government form the backdrop to Wednesday's general strike in this southern European country.

The strike was called by the powerful Confederação Geral dos Trabalhadores Portugueses (CGTP) trade union federation, which is close to the Portuguese Communist Party. It also has the support of the main unions comprising the pro-socialist União Geral de Trabalhadores (UGT) labour federation, despite the urging of UGT leader João Proença to refrain from criticising Socialist Prime Minister José Sócrates.

While trade unions reported that public sector participation in the strike was as high as 80 percent, the government said it affected only 13 percent of services.

CGTP spokeswoman Ana Avoila said the initial data indicated that 80 percent of public services have been disrupted, "the highest level seen since Apr. 25," 1974, when mid-ranking army officers overthrew a 48-year dictatorship in Portugal.

But Finance Minister Fernando Teixeira dos Santos downplayed the impact of the strike, and said it only affected some sectors. "General strikes paralyse countries, but this country is not paralysed," he said.

Hardest-hit, according to independent observers in the local press, were the subway and river transport systems in Lisbon, as well as hospitals, garbage collection, the courts, schools and city governments around the country.

The last general strike in Portugal took place in December 2002 to protest a labour code that made it easier to fire workers, promoted by then conservative Prime Minister José Manuel Durão Barroso, who is now the president of the European Commission, the European Union's executive branch.

Economy Professor María Manuela da Cruz Góis told IPS that the strike was "a consequence of monetarist and neoliberal policies imposed by the EU and the International Monetary Fund through structural adjustment measures aimed at cutting the public deficit and stabilising the local currency."

"[P]aradoxically it is the Socialist Party (PS) that is imposing measures that not even the right dared to put into effect when it was in the government," added the economist [..].

Cruz Góis said the effects of such measures "have been dramatic in Portugal, [..] and they have translated into a weakening of the [..] social welfare state, public spending, and support for small companies and other social development projects, all of which have led to a rise in poverty, exclusion and social inequality."

By contrast, Sócrates stressed last week "the strong performance" of the Portuguese economy in 2006, noting that the budget deficit had been reduced to 3.9 percent, below the 4.6 percent target set by the government.

These results, he said, meant the government was adopting "more ambitious" goals, and instead of the 3.7 percent target set for 2007, "the goal will be 3.3 percent this year and below three percent for 2008," by which time "Portugal will no longer have an excessive budget deficit."

Members of the euro currency group must keep their deficits below three percent of gross domestic product (GDP), something that Portugal -- which has the highest deficit of the 13 euro countries -- has failed to do.

But Manuel Alegre, the leader of the "left wing" of the governing PS, who was defeated by Sócrates in the party's elections for secretary general in 2003, frequently makes statements like "life exists beyond the deficit" [..]."

In fact, the indicators published last Thursday by the National Statistics Institute (INE) show that the unemployment rate has risen to 8.4 percent -- the highest level seen in the last nine years -- and is still climbing.

However, that same day, Minister of Labour and Social Solidarity José Antonio Vieira da Silva said that [..] recent figures [..] "show that the labour market is actually recovering."


On poverty and unparallelled inequality

Quote:
Another factor increasing public support for the general strike is the inequality that marks Portuguese society, CGTP leader Manuel Carvalho da Silva said in a television interview Tuesday.

According to studies by the non-governmental organisation Oikos, the 100 biggest fortunes in Portugal represent 17 percent of GDP, with the wealthiest one-fifth of the country's 10.2 million people holding around 46 percent of the national wealth, while the poorest one-fifth live in poverty.

The enormous wage gap is another common complaint among workers, who hear politicians continually harping on the need to keep wages down and urging them to "tighten their belts", while the administrators of public enterprises earn huge salaries -- as much as 2.5 times what their counterparts in Spain, France or Italy earn.

Portugal had the largest gap between the lowest and highest wages of the 25 countries comprising the EU up to Dec. 31, 2006 (Bulgaria and Romania joined the bloc in January). Among the 25, the highest wages are five times the lowest on average, compared to 7.4 times in Portugal.

In a recent seminar on poverty in Portugal, economist Manuela Silva, vice president of the Catholic Church's National Commission for Justice and Peace (CNJP), deplored the use of "false truths" with respect to curbing the budget deficit, which "should be an instrument rather than an objective of economic policy," she argued.

"It is simply unacceptable for a country that has already achieved certain income levels to continue to have such a high degree of poverty, lamented Silva, pointing out that 145,000 low-income elderly people in Portugal receive a "social pension" equivalent to just 75 dollars a month.

In addition, 120,000 retirees draw a monthly pension equivalent to 201 dollars a month, 272,000 retired farm workers draw a pension of 243 dollars a month and 708,000 retired workers in the industrial, commerce and services sectors earn pensions of 264 dollars a month.

The CGTP spent the past month raising awareness on the general strike, which is demanding a change of course in Sócrates' "neoliberal policies" in order to improve living and working conditions in Portugal.

Cruz Góis ended her interview with IPS saying the general strike was the result of "this sad history, in which there are no innocents, of the successive governments that have ruled Portugal since it joined the European Economic Community (now the EU) in 1986, and which -- unlike in Greece or Spain -- have not allowed the poor to stop being so poor."
0 Replies
 
realjohnboy
 
  1  
Sat 2 Jun, 2007 03:58 pm
Damn. What in the hell is going on in Germany today? 140 police injured in some sort of riot? Anarchists with a motiive or just street thugs?
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Sat 2 Jun, 2007 04:09 pm
realjohnboy wrote:
Damn. What in the hell is going on in Germany today? 140 police injured in some sort of riot? Anarchists with a motiive or just street thugs?

Whenever there's a G-8 meeting, there's riots..

I didnt seek out the news today yet, but by now there's something of a tradition of demonstrations and protests surrounding G-8 meetings, which get out of hand when a small minority of violent anti-globalists, "autonomists", anarchists like the Black Block, etc, take the opportunity to physically attack police + businesses.

And since Berlin, just a few hours drive from Rostock where the G-8 meeting is held, is one of the main European centres of squatters, anarchists etc...

But I'll read up.. (and wait for Walter)
0 Replies
 
HokieBird
 
  1  
Sat 2 Jun, 2007 05:41 pm
German brain drain at highest level since 1940s

By Tony Paterson in Berlin
Published: 01 June 2007

For a nation that invented the term "guest worker" for its immigrant labourers, Germany is facing the sobering fact that record numbers of its own often highly-qualified citizens are fleeing the country to work abroad in the biggest mass exodus for 60 years.

Figures released by Germany's Federal Statistics Office showed that the number of Germans emigrating rose to 155,290 last year - the highest number since the country's reunification in 1990 - which equalled levels last experienced in the 1940s during the chaotic aftermath of the Second World War.

The statistics, which also revealed that the number of immigrants had declined steadily since 2001, were a stark reminder of the extent of the German economy's decline from the heady 1960s when thousands of mainly Turkish workers flocked to find work in the country.

Leading economists and employers say the trend is alarming. They note that many among Germany's new breed of home-grown "guest workers" are highly-educated management consultants, doctors, dentists, scientists and lawyers.

OECD figures show that Germany is near the top of a league of industrial nations experiencing a brain drain which for the first time since the 1950s now exceeds the number of immigrants.

Stephanie Wahl, of the Institute for Economics, based in Bonn, said that those who are leaving Germany are mostly highly motivated and well educated. "Those coming in are mostly poor, untrained and hardly educated," she added.

Fed up with comparatively poor job prospects at home - where unemployment is as high as 17 per cent in some regions - as well as high taxes and bureaucracy, thousands of Germans have upped sticks for Austria and Switzerland, or emigrated to the United States.

Yesterday, the country'swoes were underscored by a report which disclosed that areas of unemployment-wracked eastern Germany were populated by a "male-dominated underclass susceptible to far right ideology" because of a dramatic 25 per cent exodus of young women aged 18 to 29.

More than 18,000 Germans moved to Switzerland last year. The US was the second most popular destination with 13,245, followed by Austria with 9,309.

Switzerland already has a resident German population of 170,000. Its presence has even provoked a xenophobic backlash in the country's tabloid press. Earlier this year, the Swiss newspaper Blick ran an anti-German campaign which spoke of a "German invasion" and quoted readers who claimed they found the German immigrants to be "arrogant and rude". Many immigrants, however, say the benefits of lower taxes and pay up to three times higher than at home far outweigh the occasional xenophobic outburst.

Claus Boche, a 32-year-old executive, left the west German city of Paderborn two-and-a-half years agoto take up a job with a Swiss management consulting firm. He now lives in Zurich. "Nearly everything is less bureaucratic and more go ahead than in Germany," he said. "I also pay about 40 per cent less tax. I have no plans to go back."

The current exodus hardly fits in with the official view of the German economy, which is said to be "booming". Although jobless figures for May were reported to be marginally up yesterday, Chancellor Angela Merkel's grand coalition government of conservatives and Social Democrats has taken credit for a steady 13-month decline in the country's unemployment to below four million.

However, the gradual economic upturn has so far failed to halt an exodus of the country's well-trained. Thomas Bauer, a labour economist from Essen, was scathing about Germany's employment conditions. "Germany is certainly not attractive when compared to other countries in Europe," he said. "The taxes are too high, the wages are too low and feelings of jealousy towards high-income earners is widespread. This is a special deterrent to the highly qualified.
Article
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
High taxes, low pay, hatred towards the well-off: sounds like an ideal Socialist state. Why on Earth would people be leaving it?
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Sat 2 Jun, 2007 09:05 pm
Hhmm.. some sloppinesses in this article. I think the author was on a tight deadline.

For example:

HokieBird wrote:
Fed up with comparatively poor job prospects at home - where unemployment is as high as 17 per cent in some regions - as well as high taxes and bureaucracy, thousands of Germans have upped sticks for Austria and Switzerland, or emigrated to the United States.

Yesterday, the country's woes were underscored by a report which disclosed that areas of unemployment-wracked eastern Germany were populated by a "male-dominated underclass susceptible to far right ideology" because of a dramatic 25 per cent exodus of young women aged 18 to 29.

More than 18,000 Germans moved to Switzerland last year. The US was the second most popular destination with 13,245, followed by Austria with 9,309.

Yes, I saw that report about Eastern Germany.. fascinating stuff.

It was all about how higher-educated young people, and especially higher-educated women (partly simply because the women in those regions are higher educated than the men), were leaving high-unemployment areas of the former Eastern Germany... to go live in the more dynamic cities of Western Germany.

Eg, despite the impression this part of the article very much seems to make, that report focused overwhelmingly on intra-German migration - not migration to other countries, but migration from small East-German towns with few prospects to prospering metropolitan areas of West Germany. Leaving behind, indeed, low-educated young men who in turn become more prone to far-right groups, and elderly people on low pensions.

The full report is here:

Not am Mann
"From Heroes of Labour to New Underclass? The life situations of young adults in economically deteriorating regions of the former GDR"
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

THE BRITISH THREAD II - Discussion by jespah
The United Kingdom's bye bye to Europe - Discussion by Walter Hinteler
Sinti and Roma: History repeating - Discussion by Walter Hinteler
[B]THE RED ROSE COUNTY[/B] - Discussion by Mathos
Leaving today for Europe - Discussion by cicerone imposter
So you think you know Europe? - Discussion by nimh
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.54 seconds on 11/15/2024 at 07:53:42