25
   

FOLLOWING THE EUROPEAN UNION

 
 
HofT
 
  1  
Fri 1 Jul, 2005 10:03 am
Sorry Cicerone - and a very happy 4th of July weekend to you and everybody else here Smile
0 Replies
 
HofT
 
  1  
Fri 1 Jul, 2005 10:12 am
Walter - of course I can't argue with you on German constitutional law, but in view of the 1982 precedent I think it a fair bet that both the president and the Karlsruhe sages will go along in a timely manner. Btw, my home in Bonn was in Friedrich-Ebert-Strasse - before the capital moved to Berlin and the border moved eastwards! - so I made an effort to understand the historical reasons for these parliamentary maneuvers.

Even so they look funny to anyone not familiar with the Weimar Republic Smile
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Fri 1 Jul, 2005 10:18 am
.)<The capital always has been Berlin, Bonn was the 'provisorische Haupstadt'>

Well, I'm really not sure about how Karlsruhe will decide - 1982 they said, this was wrong but since you did it, we tolerate it ... just this time. (My translation :wink: )
0 Replies
 
JustWonders
 
  1  
Fri 1 Jul, 2005 10:22 am
Quote:
Europe Panel Proposes Torture Trade Ban
Updated: Friday, Jul. 1, 2005 - 12:30 AM

BRUSSELS, Belgium (AP) - The European Commission proposed EU-wide legislation Thursday banning the trade of goods designed for torture and executions, including electric shock belts, electric chairs and guillotines.

The proposal, which needs the backing of all 25 European Union governments, would order countries to impose "strict controls" on those products and multipurpose goods that could be used "to inflict torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment," the EU executive said in a statement. Among the multiple-use goods were leg irons and electric shock weapons that have both a legitimate use but also could be used for torture.

http://www.wtopnews.com/index.php?nid=105&sid=537890



"...including electric shock belts, electric chairs and guillotines."

Wow. Europe still makes these things? Rather backwards and barbaric, dontcha think?

<Does this mean that guillotine I have on order is cancelled? LOL>
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Fri 1 Jul, 2005 10:35 am
JustWonders wrote:
Wow. Europe still makes these things? Rather backwards and barbaric, dontcha think?


Yeap, one of the main positions in the US trade deficite to the EU.
0 Replies
 
HofT
 
  1  
Fri 1 Jul, 2005 10:48 am
Walter Hinteler wrote:
.)<The capital always has been Berlin, Bonn was the 'provisorische Haupstadt'>

Well, I'm really not sure about how Karlsruhe will decide - 1982 they said, this was wrong but since you did it, we tolerate it ... just this time. (My translation :wink: )


Blah, blah, blah UND blah Walter! Just about every city of any size in Germany got to be Hauptstadt (sic, ahem!) at one point or another. As the poet said:

"Was heute nicht geschieht, ist morgen nicht getan,
Und keinen Tag soll man verpassen"
http://gutenberg.spiegel.de/goethe/faust1/faust003.htm

Smile
0 Replies
 
Steve 41oo
 
  1  
Fri 1 Jul, 2005 02:43 pm
well that was pretty devastating

no idea what it means

but could grasp the senitiment

now Walter you have to Respond

sorry for incorect spelling of sentiment
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Fri 1 Jul, 2005 02:45 pm
I better wait until .... mid-July it was, wasn't it? :wink:
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Fri 1 Jul, 2005 03:29 pm
The Turkish parliament has re-approved amendments to the country's new European Union oriented penal code, overriding an earlier veto by President Ahmet Necdet Sezer.
The new code includes the first major changes to Turkish law in 79 years and is intended to liberalize that law in order to help the nation's chances of joining the EU.
Sezer had objected to certain provisions of the code, arguing they violated the nation's secular principles by reducing punishments for running religious courses without government authorization.

The law also increases the rights of women and children, criminalizes marital rape and sexual harassment and toughens punishments for rape, pedophilia, human trafficking and torture. Sezer must now approve the law as it stands, but he can still send it to the Constitutional Court for cancellation.

Quote:

AFX News Limited
EU-sought Turkish penal code takes effect amidst criticism over press freedom

06.01.2005

ANKARA (AFX) - Turkey's new penal code, a key reform demanded by the European Union, took effect today after months of political wrangling and despite criticism that it severely restricts press freedoms.

Controversy has haunted the code ever since the government rushed it through parliament last September as part of reforms that helped Turkey win an EU green light for accession talks, scheduled to start this autumn.

The law has been welcomed for introducing a more liberal criminal justice system, in particular increasing penalties against human rights abuses and torture and significantly improving the rights of women and children.

However some parts, notably those concerning the media, triggered a widespread campaign against the law, forcing Ankara to put it on hold just days before it was due to take effect on April 1, to allow parliament time to amend several provisions.

Parliament passed the amendments last week, but President Ahmet Necdet Sezer, who has two weeks to study the articles, had not signed them into law by midnight Tuesday, which means the code has taken effect in its original form.

Foreign Minister Abdullah Gul played down the prospect of Sezer vetoing the amendments, insisting that the main reforms demanded by the EU are part of the code's original version.

'The issues of concern to the EU -- in other words, provisions related to the (EU) political criteria -- have already been amended,' Gul said.

Turkish newspapers have responed to the introduction of the new code with protests and scepticism.

'Freedom of the press is in danger,' declared the daily Aksam, while Milliyet headlined: 'Sour start to a new era.'

The Radikal newspaper also slammed the government for failing to address the complaints of press groups, which argue that under the new code, journalists may still end up behind bars, despite jail sentences having been purged from the press law in an earlier reform last year.

Experts say legal articles concerning the media contain terms vague enough to leave prosecutors and judges with room for arbitrary decisions that may threaten freedom of expression.

One article of particular concern foresees up to 15 years imprisonment for those who disseminate propaganda via the media against 'fundamental national interests' in return for material benefits from foreigners.

The article raised alarm when it emerged that explanatory notes in the draft said it targets those who may, for instance, advocate the withdrawal of Turkish troops from Cyprus or support claims that the massacre of Armenians under the Ottoman Empire was genocide.

Press groups also say provisions pertaining to the protection of privacy and the secrecy of judicial proceedings until suspects are formally charged are too restrictive and will deal a heavy blow to investigative journalism.
Source
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Fri 1 Jul, 2005 04:41 pm
nimh wrote:
Balkenende's drop in popularity antedates the Constitution referendum campaign by far as well ... its been low for ages.

His Christian-Democratic party, which got 44 seats in the January 2003 election, fell to 35 soon after, when protracted coalition negotiations with the Labour Party collapsed and the present government was formed instead. It hasn't recovered since, hovering between 30 and 35 seats almost continuously, only dipping clearly below that for a few weeks after Theo van Gogh's murder. There was no significant change in it during the referendum campaign either: initially Balkenende's party gained a few seats, then it lost them again as the campaign drew to a close.

The point here was that his actions at the EU summit, which could easily be interpreted as an attempt to ingratiate himself with the voters again, failed to have any impact either way as well.

Today in the Political Barometer, the Christian-Democrats lose another two seats ... means that in the average of the two weekly polls, they're dipping under 30 seats for the first time since the period just after Theo van Gogh's death ... Labour on the other hand wins four, the Green Left one ... I sooo wish there were elections right now ...
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Fri 1 Jul, 2005 05:59 pm
Since somebody already touched on the EU and US donations to Africa, I thought the following BBC article is pertinent. It was sent to me by a doctor in Tanzania.

Ghana 'robbed' of medics by UK
By Lucy Ash
BBC Five Live Report


Britain has a newly expanded health service but patients from the world's poorest continent are paying the price.






Korle Bu is Ghana's biggest hospital on the outskirts of the capital Accra.

As Nurse Sylvia Osei walks past the drab concrete walls of the children's emergency unit, she hears some unwelcome news.


It is new form of colonisation.
Sylvia Osei, Ghanaian nurse

Two six year old boys have just died - one had malaria, the other stopped breathing, it is not clear why.

"Those deaths were probably preventable," she says. "We could have saved them if only we had more staff."

Upstairs in the maternity department, mothers often have to queue for emergency caesareans.

One of the operating theatres here has been closed for two years because of a shortage of anaesthetists and nurses.

Korle Bu's neonatal intensive care unit has plenty of drugs and equipment - it was once the pride of West Africa - but it too is desperately short staffed.

Four exhausted looking nurses have to care for 86 seriously ill babies.

And many of the babies are only in incubators now because of the shortage of midwives around the country.

Thousands of mothers go into labour without any supervision and some of their babies then suffer from asphyxia.

Lack of oxygen during birth can lead to irreversible brain damage.

'Colonisation'

Ghana has lost a frightening 60% of its nurses.

Two thirds of young doctors have left the country within three years of graduation. Many have left for better paid jobs in the UK.

Until independence in 1957, Ghana was Britain's most prosperous African colony.

It used to send its mother country cocoa, gold, diamonds, and timber. Now it sends us its medical staff.


The G8 gives with one hand but it takes with the other
Sylvia Osei

"Its very unfair of Britain to poach our nurses", says Sylvia. "I think it is new form of colonisation.

"Tony Blair says Africa is a scar on the conscience of the world and that his government wants to help us but then why does the UK rob us of our medical staff?"

Sylvia is used to seeing her colleagues leave without even saying goodbye.

"When people leave suddenly, we say they've ruptured", she explains.

"And the next time you hear from them they're calling you from another country thousands of miles away."

Code 'makes no difference'

It is a vicious circle. The more of her colleagues leave Ghana, the worse it is for those left behind.

"Their workload falls on us and we suffer from the burn-out syndrome. It is so stressful a lot of us just have to pray to God for survival."


As long as we cynically under-produce in this country, the world's poorest countries will pay the price
James Johnson, British Medical Association chairman

When the British government was planning to expand its health system in the late 90s it urged hospitals not to plunder the developing world.

In 2001 it drew up a code of practice which discouraged active recruitment from the world's poorest countries.

But for many, Britain remains an attractive destination. Salaries are low in Ghana - about £45 a month for a junior nurse, £75 pounds for a sister.

The code of practice "hasn't made any difference" according to Ken Sagoe, the head of human resources at the Ghana Health Service.

Since it was introduced, he points out, the number of Ghanaian-trained doctors working in Britain has actually doubled.

Although staff are no longer recruited openly, they are snapped up by agencies who send them to work in private sector clinics and nursing homes before they enter the UK's NHS, through the back door.

Home training

The UK's Department for International Development has given £560m in aid to help support Africa's health care systems and train new medical staff in the last five years.

Tony Blair has set up an Africa Commission to try and lift the continent out of poverty.

But Africa is still subsidising the NHS.

If the doctors and nurses from Sub-Saharan Africa registered to work here over the last five years had actually been trained in the UK it would have cost £1.95 billion - almost four times as much as we've given in aid.

Some believe the code of practice is irrelevant because, whatever the rules, higher salaries and better conditions in the UK will always draw staff away from the developing world.

"The only answer is to train more of our own doctors and nurses", says James Johnson of the British Medical Association.

"We are training more now but it is late in the day and we started from a very low base.

"As long as we cynically under-produce in this country, the world's poorest countries will pay the price."

Sylvia agrees with this analysis. As the world's leading economies prepare to discuss aid to Africa in Edinburgh next week she says: "The G8 gives with one hand but it takes with the other - that how we see it."

Lucy Ash's report, Out of Africa: Into the NHS can be heard on Five Live on Sunday 3 July at 11.00 BST and 19.30BST and after that at the Five Live Report website .
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Fri 1 Jul, 2005 09:33 pm
Another interesting piece.

July 1, 2005
Follow the Leapin' Leprechaun
By THOMAS L. FRIEDMAN

Dublin

There is a huge debate roiling in Europe today over which economic model to follow: the Franco-German shorter-workweek-six-weeks'-vacation-never-fire-anyone-but-high-unemployment social model or the less protected but more innovative, high-employment Anglo-Saxon model preferred by Britain, Ireland and Eastern Europe. It is obvious to me that the Irish-British model is the way of the future, and the only question is when Germany and France will face reality: either they become Ireland or they become museums. That is their real choice over the next few years - it's either the leprechaun way or the Louvre.

Because I am convinced of that, I am also convinced that the German and French political systems will experience real shocks in the coming years as both nations are asked to work harder and embrace either more outsourcing or more young Muslim and Eastern European immigrants to remain competitive.

As an Irish public relations executive in Dublin remarked to me: "How would you like to be the French leader who tells the French people they have to follow Ireland?" Or even worse, Tony Blair!

Just how ugly things could get was demonstrated the other day when Mr. Blair told his E.U. colleagues at the European Parliament that they had to modernize or perish.

"Pro-Chirac French [parliamentarians] skulked at the back of the hall," The Times of London reported. But Jean Quatremer, the veteran Brussels correspondent for the French left-wing newspaper Libération, was quoted by The Times as saying: "For a long time we have been talking about the French social model, as opposed to the horrible Anglo-Saxon model, but we now see that it is our model that is a horror."

Given that Ireland received more foreign direct investment from the U.S. in 2003 than China received from the U.S., the Germans and French may want to take a few tips from the Celtic Tiger. One of the first reforms Ireland instituted was to make it easier to fire people, without having to pay years of severance. Sounds brutal, I know. But the easier it is to fire people, the more willing companies are to hire people.

Harry Kraemer Jr., the former C.E.O. of Baxter International, a medical equipment maker that has made several investments in Ireland, explained that "the energy level, the work ethic, the tax optimization and the flexibility of the labor supply" all made Ireland infinitely more attractive to invest in than France or Germany, where it was enormously costly to let go even one worker. The Irish, he added, had the self-confidence that if they kept their labor laws flexible some jobs would go, but new jobs would keep coming - and that is exactly what has happened.

Ireland is "playing offense," Mr. Kraemer said, while Germany and France are "playing defense," and the more they try to protect every old job, the fewer new ones they attract.

But Ireland has started to play offense in a lot of other ways as well. It initially focused on attracting investments from U.S. high-tech companies by offering them a flexible, educated work force and low corporate taxes. But now, explained Ireland's minister of education, Mary Hanafin, the country has started a campaign to double the number of Ph.D.'s it graduates in science and engineering by 2010, and it has set up various funds to get global companies, and just brainy people, to come to Ireland to do research. Ireland is now actively recruiting Chinese scientists in particular.

"It is good for our own quality students to be mixing with quality students from abroad," Ms. Hanafin said. "Industry will go where the major research goes."

The goal, added the minister for enterprise and trade, Micheal Martin, is to generate more homegrown Irish companies and not just work for others. His ministry recently set up an Enterprise Ireland fund to identify "high-potential Irish start-up companies and give them mentoring and support," and to also nurture mid-size Irish companies into multinationals.

And by the way, because of all the tax revenue and employment the global companies are generating in Ireland, Dublin has been able to increase spending on health care, schools and infrastructure. "You can only do this if you have the income to do it," Deputy Prime Minister Mary Harney said. "You can't have social inclusion without economic success. ... This is how you create the real social Europe."

Germany and France are trying to protect their welfare capitalism with defense. Ireland is generating its own sustainable model of social capitalism by playing offense. I'll bet on the offense.

* Copyright 2005 The New York Times Company
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Sat 2 Jul, 2005 01:08 am
Quote:
Blair kicks off EU presidency with new attack

Andrew Grice and Stephen Castle in Brussels
Published: 02 July 2005


Britain has opened a new front in the battle over the European Union's future by mounting a direct challenge to the social protection measures on the continent.

Tony Blair announced that Britain would use its six months in the EU's rotating presidency, which began yesterday, to review the European "social model" covering workers' rights, labour market flexibility, skills and welfare.

The move threatens further conflict with France and Germany, already at odds with Britain over the EU budget, who claim the British system leaves people to the mercy of the market. They offer a higher level of social protection than Britain, which believes the continental model stifles job-creation and growth. Mr Blair won the backing of the European Commission for the initiative when its members visited London for talks with ministers. The Commission is to produce a paper on the "sustainability of the European model" in the light of globalisation.

Jose Manuel Barroso, the Commission's president, said: "To have an ambitious social model, we need growth. Without growth ... we can't deliver on the expectations of social justice that our citizens have."

Mr Barroso said the EU was about "more than markets". He said it was a mistake to pitch the free market against the social market because "we need both". That was a nod in the direction of the "Nordic model" adopted by nations such as Sweden, which have used high taxes to fund huge investment in education, research and development, sparking healthy economic growth. While labour laws are more flexible, allowing employers to lay off workers more easily than in France or Germany, the jobless are supported through generous welfare payments and encouraged to retrain.

At a joint press conference with Mr Barroso, Mr Blair admitted he was "taking a risk" in raising the social model, but said: "I think it is sensible to do it. Everybody knows that is the debate going on in Europe, so let's have it."
The Prime Minister insisted: "Europe is not just about free trade and it is not just about the economy, but it is no use us trying to compete in the tough, changing world unless we are prepared to make the changes necessary, including not abandoning our social model, but updating it." Mr Blair announced that he is call an informal summit of European leaders this autumn to discuss its future direction following the "no" votes in the French and Dutch referendums on the proposed EU constitution.

He admitted that Britain was taking over the presidency at a "difficult moment" and played down hopes of a breakthrough on the budget crisis before another summit in December. "We will do our best to make progress, to reach agreement. Whether it's possible or not, I really don't know. There is no point in pretending there are not real issues and real difficulties."

Mr Barroso, who said it was a "rough period" for European politics, issued a coded warning to Britain. "No one is going to impose its own point of view on the others," he said. Calling for an urgent agreement on the budget to prevent "paralysis", he added: "Everyone has to move." He also appealed to EU leaders to embrace a "culture of compromise" and avoid "nationalist rhetoric". The message was reinforced by Peter Mandelson, the Trade commissioner and close Blair ally, who said Britain could act as an "honest broker" as long as it did not pursue its own interests rather than the EU's as a whole.

Catherine Colonna, the French European Affairs minister, said Britain had "the responsibility to ... work for the general European interest". She added that Britain's £3bn-a-year rebate remains a "problem".

Britain listed amongst its priorities reform of the Common Agricultural Policy and closer co-operation on counter-terrorism and illegal immigration.
Source
0 Replies
 
McTag
 
  1  
Sat 2 Jul, 2005 01:17 am
Cold winds blowing.
0 Replies
 
georgeob1
 
  1  
Sat 2 Jul, 2005 05:44 am
Not nearly as cold as will blow if Old Europe fails to reform.

I believe Blair was wise to raise these issues and shake up the complacent bureaucrats and "parliamentarians" of the EU. Time is on his side in this matter. The economic forces driving France and Germany (principally, but others too) to a crisis and, perhaps, awakening will not abate. The political opening in Germany appears to have already begun. I suspect that political support from the Eastern European nations for Blair's position will gradually grow. (These nations have understandably looked to France and Germany for their European future -- some time must pass for them to align themselves in this new political struggle with the new forces that better represent their own interests.) Meanwhile Italy and Spain will also have some interesting and difficult choices to make.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Sat 2 Jul, 2005 06:26 am
georgeob1 wrote:
(These nations have understandably looked to France and Germany for their European future -- some time must pass for them to align themselves in this new political struggle with the new forces that better represent their own interests.)


Not that someone gets confused: every country in the EU speaks for itself and respresents its interests itself as well.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Tue 5 Jul, 2005 05:09 am
Lithuanian European Commissioner blasts Blair

Financial Times:

Quote:
Britain's attempts to link a deal on the next European budget to reforms of Europe's farm subsidies were dismissed as "political rhetoric" by the EU budget commissioner.

Dalia Grybauskaite was scathing about British tactics over the seven-year EU budget, and said there was only "a slim chance" of a deal during the UK presidency of the union, which ends in December.


Reuters:

Quote:
EU commissioner doubts Blair's plan for EU

The European Union budget chief expressed doubts on Monday about Prime Minister Tony Blair's plan to launch fundamental economic reform of the bloc, saying it lacked substance so far and created divisions in the EU.

EU Budget Commissioner Dalia Grybauskaite, who met Blair last week, said she was pessimistic about Britain's ability to steer the EU towards a deal on its 2007-2013 budget during its six-month presidency which started on Friday.

She said Blair's liberal reform agenda, unveiled at the European Parliament last month, had so far produced only a theoretical debate, which could distract the EU's 25 members from reaching the budget deal this year.

"Today, I can see only the willingness to engage in a battle, to engage in the discussion about reforms, without really identifying the substance of reforms," Grybauskaite, a former finance minister of Lithuania, told reporters.

"Any European discussion on reforms is a long process ... If the goal is to restore the damaged image at home by fashionable discussion on reform, if we will see that by December, I can evaluate it as an example of irresponsible ... populism," she said, but declined to blame Blair directly. [..]

"It's mainly a war of words, maybe more political rhetoric which we hear at the media level. All sides do not yet engage in real discussions about reforms," said Grybauskaite.

Grybauskaite said the EU crisis would deepen if the bloc failed to agree on the budget by December, the end of Blair's presidency, and if Britain's reform drive did not bring results. [..]

[Blair has] pledged efforts to secure a budget deal, which is crucial for the EU's new member states from eastern Europe to receive billions of euros in the bloc's aid to modernise their economies damaged by decades of communist rule. [..]

[Grybauskaite] warned that new member states such as Poland and the Baltic republics would lose billions of euros in EU aid unless the budget agreement is reached by December.

If it is not, Austria would seek to clinch a deal at the end of its presidency in June.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Tue 5 Jul, 2005 05:13 am
nimh wrote:
And then there was this ...
Quote:
Berlusconi rubs salt in Finnish wound at food body

PARMA, Italy (Reuters) - Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi repeated one of his most famous diplomatic gaffes on Tuesday by insulting the cuisine of Finland which Italy beat to host the new European Food Safety Authority.

"I've been to Finland and I had to endure the Finnish diet so I am in a position to make a comparison," Berlusconi told local dignitaries ahead of the inauguration of the EFSA in the northern Italian town of Parma.


Well, it seems like Berlusconi is creating a trend ... this time, it was Chirac's turn:

Quote:
Chirac serves up next dish in war of words

Jacques Chirac, French president, has opened a new front in his war of words with Britain, claiming that the UK's main contribution to European agriculture was "mad cow disease".

In another example of the flourishing entente cordiale, Mr Chirac is also said to have poured Gallic scorn on British cuisine during a meeting with Gerhard Schröder, German chancellor, and Vladimir Putin, Russian president. "You can't trust people who cook as badly as that," he said. "After Finland, it's the country with the worst food."

The exchange on the margins of a meeting in Kaliningrad, Russia, was reported in Monday's Libération, and was not denied by Mr Chirac's spokesman.

The comments come after Tony Blair launched his campaign to reform Europe's farm subsidy regime, of which French farmers are the biggest beneficiaries.

Mr Chirac's culinary jibe adds further spice to this week's confrontation with Mr Blair in Singapore, where Paris and London are battling to stage the 2012 Olympic Games. British cuisine is a regular target of French jokes in spite of the rising reputation of British restaurants and the popularity in France of British television chefs like Jamie Oliver.
0 Replies
 
Steve 41oo
 
  1  
Tue 5 Jul, 2005 05:23 am
thoroughly agree with Chirac

Finland has the worst food in Europe.

In fact they eat nothing but hydrogenated vegetable fat and blubber.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Tue 5 Jul, 2005 02:19 pm
Interior ministers for Britain, France, Italy, Spain and Germany meeting prior to the G8 summit Tuesday announced a plan to put together joint flights to deport illegal immigrants from the European Union.

The plan calls for planes to stop in each of the five nations to pick up illegal immigrants of the same nationality before returning them to their home country. The five countries - dubbed the Group of Five - hope that the combined effort will streamline Europe's attempt to eradicate illegal immigration.

Another aspect of the proposed agreement are joint naval operations that would be carried out in the Mediterranean to block human trafficking from countries in Africa. French Interior Minister Nicolas Sarcozy said that the deportation flights could begin in a matter of days.

BBC: Europeans join forces on migrants
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

THE BRITISH THREAD II - Discussion by jespah
The United Kingdom's bye bye to Europe - Discussion by Walter Hinteler
Sinti and Roma: History repeating - Discussion by Walter Hinteler
[B]THE RED ROSE COUNTY[/B] - Discussion by Mathos
Leaving today for Europe - Discussion by cicerone imposter
So you think you know Europe? - Discussion by nimh
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 05/14/2024 at 08:27:35