Frank Apisa wrote:BTW -- I think we all have to recognize that sometimes the substance of what you have to say is such that people to whom you are saying it are going to be offended -- whether the remark is meant to offend -- or merely to share information.
I discuss religion a lot.
There are times where I am sharing my opinion of the god described in the Bible. (It is not a very favorable opinion!)
How do I share what I truly feel without offending?
Should sharing what one truly feels be considered a lack of respect?
No need to pull punches at all.
If you want to say God is a stupid insipid intellectually bankrupt construct many would be offended. But that is decidedly within the TOS.
Now if you append "and you are dumbass for believeing in it" then you would have breached the TOS.
It may seem like a silly way to define things but try to differentiate ad hominems from simply passionate debate and you'll see why it's a useful criteria.
It's indeed very possible to be quite an ass without breaking the TOS. But there are certain things that have little in way of "grey area" like obvious flaming that involves vulgar insults.
With sarcasm and such it's possible to be quite mean. But quantifying that is simply not easy. It's very easy to say don't call each otehr assholes and those types of things are more likely to draw attention.
A simple rule for those who want to debate passionately (here's my secret to being an ass):
Focus on the arguments. Attack them and stomp them into the ground. But avoid directing your passion at your opponent.
"That is the stupidest argument on earth"
IS different from
"You are the stupidest person on earth"
Both are treated VERY differently by the moderating team.